CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · International Journal of Practical Otolaryngology 2022; 05(01): e45-e50
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759820
Original Article

Using Virtual Reality to Teach Sinus Anatomy

Kei Hosoya
1   Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organ Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
,
Taro Komachi
1   Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organ Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
,
Maki Sugimoto
3   Innovation Lab, Teikyo University Okinaga Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
,
Ayaho Yoshino
1   Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organ Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
,
Junko Kuya
1   Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organ Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
,
Kimihiro Okubo
1   Department of Head and Neck and Sensory Organ Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Anatomy education is a crucial part of the curriculum for medical students, and it is essential for surgeons to perform safe surgery. The anatomy of the sinus cavity is complicated and cannot be easily understood through cadaver dissection practice and reading of surgical anatomy textbooks. Therefore, the development of methods to effectively teach the anatomy of such complex structures is essential for performing safe medical procedures. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of virtual reality (VR) in an educational course on paranasal sinus anatomy could contribute to the understanding and learning efficiency of dissection of the complex sinus anatomy. We devised a system to observe the paranasal sinuses in the VR space by polygonizing the shape of the sinus cavity using computed tomography images of the sinuses. Medical students moved around the VR space and viewed the sinuses from different angles using the VR system; notably, this is impossible in a conventional anatomy laboratory. A questionnaire was administered to 27 medical students (15 men and 12 women; mean age, 24.9 years) to evaluate their understanding of the sinus anatomy and the number of times they had experienced VR and used VR systems. We found that more than 70% of the students had never used VR before, but they could easily use it even if they were unfamiliar with the operation of the VR system, and the learning process was enjoyable and efficient. Thus, the VR application could be a useful tool for educating medical students.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.




Publication History

Received: 26 April 2022

Accepted: 14 September 2022

Article published online:
20 December 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Lockwood AM, Roberts AM. The anatomy demonstrator of the future: an examination of the role of the medically-qualified anatomy demonstrator in the context of tomorrow's doctors and modernizing medical careers. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (04) 455-459
  • 2 Moxham BJ, Plaisant O. Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (05) 560-564
  • 3 Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29 (02) 173-180
  • 4 Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat 2016; 208: 151-157
  • 5 Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Viewpoint: exploring the human interior: the roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Acad Med 2005; 80 (08) 745-749
  • 6 Pabst R. Anatomy curriculum for medical students: what can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries?. Ann Anat 2009; 191 (06) 541-546
  • 7 Zuckerman JD, Wise SK, Rogers GA, Senior BA, Schlosser RJ, DelGaudio JM. The utility of cadaver dissection in endoscopic sinus surgery training courses. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (02) 218-224
  • 8 Al-Abri R, Bhargava D, Al-Bassam W, Al-Badaai Y, Sawhney S. Clinically significant anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses. Oman Med J 2014; 29 (02) 110-113
  • 9 Ujike H, Watanabe H. Visually induced motion sickness in virtual reality environments and corresponding countermeasures. Neuro-Ophthalmol Jpn 2019; 36: 22-29
  • 10 Narita W. Introduction of XR (VR, AR, MR) in spine surgery. Orthop Surg Traumatol 2021; 64: 1371-1379
  • 11 Trelease RB. Anatomical informatics: millennial perspectives on a newer frontier. Anat Rec 2002; 269 (05) 224-235
  • 12 Sugimoto M. The spatial off-the-job surgical training using 3D organ model, stereoscopic imaging, and online virtual/augmented/mixed reality. Clin Surg 2020; 75: 442-449
  • 13 Holoeyes Inc. Accessed December 6, 2022 at: https://holoeyes.jp/
  • 14 Reeves RE, Aschenbrenner JE, Wordinger RJ, Roque RS, Sheedlo HJ. Improved dissection efficiency in the human gross anatomy laboratory by the integration of computers and modern technology. Clin Anat 2004; 17 (04) 337-344
  • 15 Aouam D, Zenati-Henda N, Benbelkacem S, Hamitouche C. An interactive VR system for anatomy training. In: Mixed Reality and Three-Dimensional Computer Graphics. IntechOpen; 2020
  • 16 Falah J, Khan S, Alfalah T. et al. Virtual reality medical training system for anatomy education. In: 2014 Science and Information Conference. IEEE; 2014: 752-758
  • 17 McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: a six-year study. Anat Sci Educ 2009; 2 (01) 2-8
  • 18 Nicholson DT, Chalk C, Funnell WRJ, Daniel SJ. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ 2006; 40 (11) 1081-1087
  • 19 Hegarty M. Spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. Spat Cogn Comput 2014; 14: 142-167
  • 20 Kumalasari L, Yusuf Hilmi A, Priyandoko D. The application of multiple intelligence approach to the learning of human circulatory system. J Phys Conf Ser 2017; 909: 012066
  • 21 Lucardie D. The impact of fun and enjoyment on adult's learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2014; 142: 439-446
  • 22 Light R. The social nature of games: Australian preservice primary Teachers' first experiences of teaching games for understanding. Eur Phys Educ Rev 2002; 8: 286-304
  • 23 Maresky HS, Oikonomou A, Ali I, Ditkofsky N, Pakkal M, Ballyk B. Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education. Clin Anat 2019; 32 (02) 238-243
  • 24 Neville AJ. Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. A review of its effects on knowledge and clinical performance. Med Princ Pract 2009; 18 (01) 1-9
  • 25 Hara N, Orikasa S. Influence of virtual reality (VR) environment on attitude-control and binocular vision function: 3D-related vision fatigue and disorder. J Eye 2019; 36: 867-876
  • 26 Bando T. Biomedical influences possibly caused by experiences in virtual reality in relation to the visual and autonomic nervous functions. Neuro-Ophthalmol Jpn 2019; 36: 5-11