Planta Med 2022; 88(15): 1456
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759052
Poster Session I

Identification and quantification of pesticides residues in health and herbal products purchased from Saudi markets

F Albugami
Saudi Food and Drug Authority (sfda), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
A Refaei
Saudi Food and Drug Authority (sfda), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
N Al Rashed
Saudi Food and Drug Authority (sfda), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
› Institutsangaben
 

Background: Herbal products are consumed by approximately 80% of the world population owing to its beneficial effects to humanʼs health.

Importantly, these products are from natural sources or have “Natural” in their labeling and so there are general presumptions of their safety and quality. However, there are literature data showing that herbal products could potentially be contaminated through many ways.

Objective: The study aimed to determine the pesticides residues in herbal products purchased from Saudi markets.

Materials and Methods: 41 products were extracted using QuEChERS, and then analysed using LC-MS/MS to determine 232 pesticide residues. Observed pesticides were compared to regulations of USP and SFDA.

Results: Results showed that pesticides residues were detected in 26.8% of the examined samples in concentrations ranging from 25.3 to 493.2 µg/kg.

Moreover, 6 different pesticides residues were identified in the tested products as illustrated in [Table 1].

Table 1 Pesticide residues detected in herbal products analyzed in SFDA Laboratory.

Most repetitive compounds

Frequency (%)

Frequency (n)

Concentration Range (µg/kg)

LOQ (µg/kg)

LOD (µg/kg)

Carbendazim

23.1

3

25.290

161.210

25.000

8.000

Imidacloprid

30.8

4

44.980

251.730

Propoxur

15.4

2

60.140

389.780

Isoprocarb

15.4

2

106.280

244.260

Metolcarb

7.7

1

72.160

Cymoxanil

7.7

1

493.21

Total

100.0

13

Imidacloprid occurred most frequently in 4 samples, there are 2 samples has more than one pesticide residues while sample code 31 has the highest concentration of pesticide (493.2 µg/kg).

Finally, our findings revealed that all detected analytes were not in the “Herbal and Health Products” regulation in the SFDA and the (USP) which only determined 70 pesticides.

Conclusion: it is necessary to expand the SFDAʼs regulatory program for herbal products to cover as many possible pesticides as possible and to carry out frequent safety examinations of these herbal products, and demanding companies to conduct pesticide detection testing for finished herbal products.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Dezember 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany