CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ann Natl Acad Med Sci 2023; 59(01): 049-054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758225
Case Report

Challenges with Adjuvant Radiation for Intracranial Chondrosarcoma in Pregnancy

Arun Yadav
1   Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Shikha Goyal
1   Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Renu Madan
1   Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Ranjit Singh
1   Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Aarti Chitkara
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Divya Khosla
1   Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Managing a brain tumor during pregnancy is a highly confusing and challenging situation, complicated by several technical, medical, ethical, and sociocultural concerns. The interests of the mother and child are often pitted against each other, for which legal opinion may occasionally be needed.

Case Report We present the report of a young lady with intracranial well-differentiated chondrosarcoma who was determined to be pregnant in the immediate postoperative period. We discuss the management of challenges and dilemmas in devising optimum therapy, and the modifications and care required at each step to help safeguard maternal and fetal health. Risks with therapeutic radiation and measures to assess and pre-empt fetal doses that may assist decision-making are also discussed.

Conclusion Radiation therapy during pregnancy is challenging and requires multidisciplinary involvement and psychosocial support for the patient and family.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


Author Contributions

A.K.Y. contributed to concept, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation, and manuscript review. S.G. and R.M. were involved in concept, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. R.S., A.C., and D.K. helped in definition of intellectual content, data acquisition, and manuscript review.




Publication History

Article published online:
06 February 2023

© 2023. National Academy of Medical Sciences (India). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cancer Stat Facts: Brain and Other Nervous System Cancer. Accessed October 13, 2022 at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html
  • 2 Simon RH. Brain tumors in pregnancy. Semin Neurol 1988; 8 (03) 214-221
  • 3 Yu C, Luxton G. TLD dose measurement: a simplified accurate technique for the dose range from 0.5 cGy to 1000 cGy. Med Phys 1999; 26 (06) 1010-1016
  • 4 Singh R, Oinam AS, Trivedi G. et al. A comparative study for surface dose evaluation in conventional treatment of carcinoma breast patients irradiated with Co-60 and 6 MV radiation beam. J Cancer Res Ther 2019; 15 (05) 1035-1041
  • 5 Singh R, Kainth HS. Effect of heating rate on thermoluminescence output of LiF: Mg, Ti (TLD-100) in dosimetric applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2018; 426: 22-29
  • 6 Bloch OG, Jian BJ, Yang I. et al. Cranial chondrosarcoma and recurrence. Skull Base 2010; 20 (03) 149-156
  • 7 van Westrhenen A, Senders JT, Martin E, DiRisio AC, Broekman MLD. Clinical challenges of glioma and pregnancy: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139 (01) 1-11
  • 8 Donnelly EH, Smith JM, Farfán EB, Ozcan I. Prenatal radiation exposure: background material for counseling pregnant patients following exposure to radiation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2011; 5 (01) 62-68
  • 9 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann ICRP 2000; 30 (01) 1-43
  • 10 NCRP. NCRP Report. Preconception and Prenatal Radiation Exposure: Health Effects and Protective Guidance. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2013
  • 11 Labby ZE, Barraclough B, Bayliss RA, Besemer AE, Dunkerley DAP, Howard SP. Radiation treatment planning and delivery strategies for a pregnant brain tumor patient. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19 (05) 368-374
  • 12 Stovall M, Blackwell CR, Cundiff J. et al. Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36. Med Phys 1995; 22 (01) 63-82
  • 13 Magné N, Marcié S, Pignol JP, Casagrande F, Lagrange JL. Radiotherapy for a solitary brain metastasis during pregnancy: a method for reducing fetal dose. Br J Radiol 2001; 74 (883) 638-641
  • 14 Goyal S, Yadav A, Madan R. et al. Managing brain tumors in pregnancy: The oncologist's struggle with maternal-fetal conflict. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18 (01) 5-18
  • 15 Maggen C, van Gerwen M, Van Calsteren K, Vandenbroucke T, Amant F. Management of cancer during pregnancy and current evidence of obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcome: a review article. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000061.