Semin Reprod Med 2022; 40(05/06): 235-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758114
Review Article

Improving Access to and Quality of Postpartum Contraception Provision

Michelle Cooper 
1   Department of Gynaecologist, Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
,
Sharon Cameron
1   Department of Gynaecologist, Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Sexual activity and fertility can resume shortly after childbirth, but there are barriers to contraceptive access in the postpartum period. Unintended pregnancy and short interpregnancy intervals (of less than one year) can increase the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications. The antenatal period presents an opportunity to discuss contraceptive options, many of which can be safely initiated immediately after childbirth. Successful delivery of a postpartum contraception program requires an adequate number of maternity staff trained to provide the full range of methods.

Keywords

contraception - postpartum contraception - long-acting reversible contraception - health service delivery


Publication History

Article published online:
10 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Jackson E, Glasier A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (03) 657-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McDonald EA, Brown SJ. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth?. BJOG 2013; 120 (07) 823-830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heller R, Cameron S, Briggs R, Forson N, Glasier A. Postpartum contraception: a missed opportunity to prevent unintended pregnancy and short inter-pregnancy intervals. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2016; 42 (02) 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thwaites A, Tran AB, Mann S. Women's and healthcare professionals' views on immediate postnatal contraception provision: a literature review. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019; 45 (02) 88-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327 (7410): 313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Taylor RAM, Yang JM, Cheney K, Black K. Short interpregnancy interval: circumstance or choice?. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022; 48 (02) 110-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 World Health Organization. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing. Geneva: 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Brunner Huber LR, Smith K, Sha W, Zhao L, Vick T. Factors associated with pregnancy intention among women who have experienced a short birth interval: findings from the 2009 to 2011 Mississippi and 2009 Tennessee Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Ann Epidemiol 2018; 28 (06) 372-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yang JM, Cheney K, Taylor R, Black K. Interpregnancy intervals and women's knowledge of the ideal timing between birth and conception. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019; 45 (04) 249-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 McCance K, Cameron S. Midwives' experiences and views of giving postpartum contraceptive advice and providing long-acting reversible contraception: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2014; 40 (03) 177-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Botfield JR, Tulloch M, Contziu H. et al. Contraception provision in the postpartum period: knowledge, views and practices of midwives. Women Birth 2021; 34 (01) e1-e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lunniss H, Cameron S, Chen ZE. Views of general practitioners on providing contraceptive advice and long-acting reversible contraception at the 6-week postnatal visit: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2016; 42 (02) 99-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Glasier AF, Logan J, McGlew TJ. Who gives advice about postpartum contraception?. Contraception 1996; 53 (04) 217-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Theurich MA, Davanzo R, Busck-Rasmussen M. et al. Breastfeeding rates and programs in Europe: a survey of 11 national breastfeeding committees and representatives. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68 (03) 400-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Public Health Scotland. Infant feeding statistics Scotland 2020/21. Accessed October 10, 2022 at: https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/9971/2021-11-02-infant-feeding-statistics-report.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thwaites A, Logan L, Nardone A, Mann S. Women's and healthcare professionals' views on immediate postnatal contraception provision: a literature review. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019; 45 (02) 88-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. Contraception after Pregnancy. FSRH; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. UK Medical Eligibility for Contraceptive Use. FSRH; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Medical Eligibility for Contraceptive Use. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Cameron ST, Craig A, Sim J. et al. Feasibility and acceptability of introducing routine antenatal contraceptive counselling and provision of contraception after delivery: the APPLES pilot evaluation. BJOG 2017; 124 (13) 2009-2015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Croan L, Craig A, Scott L, Cameron ST, Lakha F. Increasing access to contraceptive implants in the postnatal period via a home insertion service by community midwives. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018; 44 (01) 61-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Heller R, Johnstone A, Cameron ST. Routine provision of intrauterine contraception at elective cesarean section in a national public health service: a service evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96 (09) 1144-1151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Heck M, Cooper M, McCabe K, Johnstone A, Cameron ST. Postpartum insertion of intrauterine contraception at time of cesarean section: a 5-year follow up (poster abstract). 16th European Society of Contraception Congress, Ghent, Belgium. Accessed May 2022 at: https://escrh.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/abstract-book-LV.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cooper M, McGeechan K, Glasier A. et al. Provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraception after vaginal birth within a public maternity setting: Health services research evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99 (05) 598-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M. et al. FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: Complication rates across six countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (Suppl. 01) 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, Nayeri UA, Caughey AB, Werner EF. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (01) 131-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Boydell N, Cooper M, Cameron ST. et al. Women's experiences of accessing postpartum intrauterine contraception in a public maternity setting: a qualitative service evaluation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2020; 25 (06) 465-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cooper M, Cameron S. Successful implementation of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraception services in Edinburgh and framework for wider dissemination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (Suppl. 01) 56-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rankin KM, Kroelinger CD, DeSisto CL. et al. Application of implementation science methodology to immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception policy roll-out across states. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (1, Suppl 1): 173-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Okoroh EM, Kane DJ, Gee RE. et al. Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (06) 590.e1-590.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dev R, Woods NF, Unger JA. et al. Acceptability, feasibility and utility of a mobile health family planning decision aid for postpartum women in Kenya. Reprod Health 2019; 16 (01) 97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Cooper M, Boydell N, Heller R, Cameron S. Community sexual health providers' views on immediate postpartum provision of intrauterine contraception. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2018; 44 (02) 97-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar