CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2023; 11(01): 001-009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757947
Original Research Article

Managing the Root in Acute Type A Aortic Dissections: Are We Ready for a Standardized Approach?

1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Benjamin Adams
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Kulvinder Lall
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
John Yap
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Carmelo Di Salvo
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Rakesh Uppal
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
,
Aung Oo
1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objectives Surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) requires exclusion of the primary entry tear and reestablishment of flow into the distal true lumen. Provided that the majority of tears occur within the ascending aorta (AA), replacing only that segment seems a safe option; however, this strategy leaves the root susceptible to dilatation and need for reintervention. We aimed to review the outcomes of the two strategies: aortic root replacement (ARR) and isolated ascending aortic replacement.

Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all consecutive patients who underwent repair of acute TAAD at our institution from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) ARR and (2) isolated AA replacement as index operation for TAAD repair. Primary outcomes were mortality and need for reintervention during the follow-up.

Results A total of 194 patients were included in the study; 68 (35%) in the ARR group and 126 (65%) in the AA group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications or in-hospital mortality (23%; p = 0.51) between groups. Seven patients (4.7%) died during follow-up and eight patients underwent aortic reinterventions, including proximal aortic segments (two patients) and distal procedures (six patients).

Conclusion Both aortic root and AA replacement are acceptable and safe techniques. The growth of an untouched root is slow, and reintervention in this aortic segment is infrequent compared with distal aortic segments, hence preserving the root could be an option for older patients provided that there is no primary tear within the root.



Publication History

Received: 09 September 2021

Accepted: 11 July 2022

Article published online:
27 February 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Tsai TT, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation 2005; 112 (24) 3802-3813
  • 2 Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA. et al; 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 2010; 121 (13) e266-e369
  • 3 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C. et al; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines; The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. Eur Heart J 2014; 35 (41) 2873-2926
  • 4 Di Eusanio M, Trimarchi S, Peterson MD. et al. Root replacement surgery versus more conservative management during type A acute aortic dissection repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98 (06) 2078-2084
  • 5 Hysi I, Juthier F, Fabre O. et al. Aortic root surgery improves long-term survival after acute type A aortic dissection. Int J Cardiol 2015; 184: 285-290
  • 6 Leshnower BG, Chen EP. When and how to replace the aortic root in type A aortic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5 (04) 377-382
  • 7 Urbanski PP, Lenos A, Irimie V, Bougioukakis P, Zacher M, Diegeler A. Acute aortic dissection involving the root: operative and long-term outcome after curative proximal repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22 (05) 620-626
  • 8 Ikeno Y, Yokawa K, Yamanaka K. et al. The fate of aortic root and aortic regurgitation after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement for acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161 (02) 483-493 .e1
  • 9 Castrovinci S, Pacini D, Di Marco L. et al. Surgical management of aortic root in type A acute aortic dissection: a propensity-score analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50 (02) 223-229
  • 10 Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S. et al; EACTS/ESVS scientific document group. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55 (01) 133-162
  • 11 Kazui T, Washiyama N, Bashar AHM. et al. Role of biologic glue repair of proximal aortic dissection in the development of early and midterm redissection of the aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (02) 509-514
  • 12 Peterss S, Dumfarth J, Rizzo JA. et al. Sparing the aortic root in acute aortic dissection type A: risk reduction and restored integrity of the untouched root. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50 (02) 232-239
  • 13 Rylski B, Beyersdorf F, Blanke P. et al. Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: what happens to the aortic root in the long run?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146 (02) 285-290
  • 14 Lai DT, Miller DC, Mitchell RS. et al. Acute type A aortic dissection complicated by aortic regurgitation: composite valve graft versus separate valve graft versus conservative valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126 (06) 1978-1986
  • 15 Yang B, Norton EL, Hobbs R. et al. Short- and long-term outcomes or aortic root repair and replacement in patient undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair: twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 215-236
  • 16 Nishida H, Tabata M, Fukui T, Takanashi S. Surgical strategy and outcome for aortic root in patients undergoing repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101 (04) 1464-1469
  • 17 Geirsson A, Bavaria JE, Swarr D. et al. Fate of the residual distal and proximal aorta after acute type a dissection repair using a contemporary surgical reconstruction algorithm. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84 (06) 1955-1964 , discussion 1955–1964
  • 18 Estrera AL, Miller III CC, Villa MA. et al. Proximal reoperations after repaired acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83 (05) 1603-1608 , discussion 1608–1609
  • 19 Concistrè G, Casali G, Santaniello E. et al. Reoperation after surgical correction of acute type A aortic dissection: risk factor analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93 (02) 450-455
  • 20 Ellauzi H, Zafar MA, Wu J. et al. Fate of preserved aortic root following acute type A aortic dissection repair. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 2022; 34 (02) 419-427