Is Preoperative Facial Palsy a Deterrent to Facial Nerve Preservation after Gross-Total Removal of Giant Vestibular Schwannomas?

Abstract

Background Although rare in small vestibular schwannomas, preoperative facial nerve paresis is often present in giant schwannomas. Preserving facial nerve function in these cases remains a herculean task. This study evaluates the facial functions after complete tumor removal and whether preoperative facial nerve involvement affects postoperative functional status.

Methods This retrospective study from January 2014 to August 2021 excluded nongiant tumors (< 4 cm), neurofibromatosis type 2 cases, incomplete removals, redo surgeries, deaths, and cases done without nerve monitoring. These were grouped into preoperative facial palsy present (PFP) and no preoperative facial palsy (NFP). Facial nerve functions were assessed on first postoperative day, at the time of discharge, and at last follow-up and dichotomized into two groups: nondisfiguring (House–Brackmann [HB] grades I–III) and disfiguring (HB grades IV–VI). The cohort outcomes of patients with nondisfiguring PFP (HB grades I–III) were also analyzed.

Results There were 88 cases (PFP, n = 57; NFP, n = 31). Facial nerve was preserved anatomically in 62 (70.45%) patients (PFP, n = 38; NFP, n = 24) without any statistical difference (p = 0.29). Statistically significant disfiguring facial outcomes (HB IV, V, VI) were seen in patients with preoperative facial palsy (p = 0.01); however, a comparison of facial functions in patients with only nondisfiguring PFP with those in NFP group did not show the statistical difference (p = 0.12).

Conclusion Facial nerve palsy present before surgery does not seem to be a deterrent to intraoperative preservation of facial nerve during complete removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. Patients with nondisfiguring facial palsies have postoperative facial functions comparable to those without facial palsy.

Keywords

giant vestibular schwannomas - facial palsy - facial nerve preservation

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Dezember 2022

• References

• 1 Moffat DA, Ballagh RH. Rare tumours of the cerebellopontine angle. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1995; 7 (01) 28-41
• 2 Bonneville F, Sarrazin JL, Marsot-Dupuch K. et al. Unusual lesions of the cerebellopontine angle: a segmental approach. Radiographics 2001; 21 (02) 419-438
• 3 Lalwani AK. Meningiomas, epidermoids, and other nonacoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992; 25 (03) 707-728
• 4 Grey PL, Moffat DA, Hardy DG. Surgical results in unusual cerebellopontine angle tumours. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996; 21 (03) 237-243
• 5 Brunori A, Scarano P, Chiappetta F. Non-acoustic neuroma tumor (NANT) of the cerebello-pontine angle: a 15-year experience. J Neurosurg Sci 1997; 41 (02) 159-168
• 6 Khrais T, Romano G, Sanna M. Nerve origin of vestibular schwannoma: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (02) 128-131
• 7 Rinaldi V, Casale M, Bressi F. et al. Facial nerve outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: our experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (01) 21-27
• 8 Schmitt WR, Daube JR, Carlson ML. et al. Use of supramaximal stimulation to predict facial nerve outcomes following vestibular schwannoma microsurgery: results from a decade of experience. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (01) 206-212
• 9 Falcioni M, Fois P, Taibah A, Sanna M. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (04) 820-826
• 10 Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (04) 527-535
• 11 Matthies C, Samii M. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): clinical presentation. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (01) 1-9 , discussion 9–10
• 12 Neely JG, Neblett CR. Differential facial nerve function in tumors of the internal auditory meatus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92 (1 Pt 1): 39-41
• 13 Bloch O, Sughrue ME, Kaur R. et al. Factors associated with preservation of facial nerve function after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol 2011; 102 (02) 281-286
• 14 Mooney MA, Hendricks B, Sarris CE, Spetzler RF, Almefty KK, Porter RW. Long-term facial nerve outcomes after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas in patients with preoperative facial nerve palsy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (03) 309-313
• 15 Propp JM, McCarthy BJ, Davis FG, Preston-Martin S. Descriptive epidemiology of vestibular schwannomas. Neuro-oncol 2006; 8 (01) 1-11
• 16 Borkar SA, Garg A, Mankotia DS. et al. Prediction of facial nerve position in large vestibular schwannomas using diffusion tensor imaging tractography and its intraoperative correlation. Neurol India 2016; 64 (05) 965-970
• 17 Gupta S, Mends F, Hagiwara M, Fatterpekar G, Roehm PC. Imaging the facial nerve: a contemporary review. Radiol Res Pract 2013; 2013: 248039
• 18 Turel MK, Babu KS, Singh G, Chacko AG. The utility of facial nerve amplitude and latency ratios in predicting postoperative facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurol India 2014; 62 (02) 178-182
• 19 Turel MK, D'Souza WP, Chacko AG, Rajshekhar V. Giant vestibular schwannomas: surgical nuances influencing outcome in 179 patients. Neurol India 2016; 64 (03) 478-484
• 20 Babin R, Roffman G, Ryu J. The effect of systolic blood pressure on calibrated pressure-induced neuropraxia of the feline facial nerve. In: Graham M, House W. eds. Disorders of the Facial Nerve: Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Management. New York: Raven Press; 1982: 7-16
• 21 Roosli C, Linthicum Jr FH, Cureoglu S, Merchant SN. What is the site of origin of cochleovestibular schwannomas?. Audiol Neurotol 2012; 17 (02) 121-125
• 22 Jain VK, Mehrotra N, Sahu RN, Behari S, Banerji D, Chhabra DK. Surgery of vestibular schwannomas: an institutional experience. Neurol India 2005; 53 (01) 41-45 , discussion 45
• 23 Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A. Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (04) 860-867
• 24 Huang X, Xu J, Xu M. et al. Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital. BMC Neurol 2017; 17 (01) 18
• 25 Zhang X, Fei Z, Chen YJ. et al. Facial nerve function after excision of large acoustic neuromas via the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. J Clin Neurosci 2005; 12 (04) 405-408
• 26 Yang X, Zhang Y, Liu X, Ren Y. [Microsurgical treatment and facial nerve preservation in 400 cases of giant acoustic neuromas]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014; 28 (01) 79-84
• 27 Silva J, Cerejo A, Duarte F, Silveira F, Vaz R. Surgical removal of giant acoustic neuromas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (5-6): 731-735
• 28 Hong W, Cheng H, Wang X, Feng C. Influencing factors analysis of facial nerve function after the microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2017; 60 (02) 165-173
• 29 Gupta SK, Gupta D, Savardekar A. Extra-arachnoidal dissection and limited meatal drilling for excision of giant vestibular schwannomas: improved facial nerve preservation. Neurol India 2022; 70 (01) 115-121
• 30 Kohno M, Sato H, Sora S, Miwa H, Yokoyama M. Is an acoustic neuroma an epiarachnoid or subarachnoid tumor?. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (04) 1006-1016 , discussion 1016–1017
• 31 Jääskeläinen J, Paetau A, Pyykkö I, Blomstedt G, Palva T, Troupp H. Interface between the facial nerve and large acoustic neurinomas. Immunohistochemical study of the cleavage plane in NF2 and non-NF2 cases. J Neurosurg 1994; 80 (03) 541-547
• 32 Sun MZ, Oh MC, Safaee M, Kaur G, Parsa AT. Neuroanatomical correlation of the House-Brackmann grading system in the microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E7
• 33 Scheller C, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R, Romstöck J. Delayed facial nerve paresis following acoustic neuroma resection and postoperative vasoactive treatment. Zentralbl Neurochir 2004; 65 (03) 103-107
• 34 Yildiz S, Bademkiran F, Yildiz N, Aydogdu I, Uludag B, Ertekin C. Facial motor cortex plasticity in patients with unilateral peripheral facial paralysis. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22 (02) 133-140
• 35 Gordin E, Lee TS, Ducic Y, Arnaoutakis D. Facial nerve trauma: evaluation and considerations in management. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2015; 8 (01) 1-13
• 36 Kumar S, Sahana D, Nair A. et al. Hearing rehabilitation after treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Neurol India 2022; 70 (03) 849-856