RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757161
Effect of Battery Discharge on the Output from Budget Light-Curing Units
Autoren
Abstract
Objectives The manufacturers of budget light-curing units (LCUs) often claim to provide high-quality units that are equivalent to LCUs from major manufacturers. This study investigated the effects of battery discharge on the light output from different budget LCUs compared to a major manufacturer.
Materials and Methods Two brands of budget LCUs (LY-A180 and LED-CL) were compared to a control LCU from a major manufacturer (3M). The LCUs were fully charged, and their light outputs were measured over one battery discharge cycle using repeated 10-second exposures at a 0-mm distance.
Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post-hoc test.
Results The budget LCUs delivered fluctuating light output values. In their first exposure, the budget LCUs delivered between 205 and 444 mW power, an irradiance between 533 and 1154 mW/cm2, and a radiant exposure between 5.3 and 11.5 J/cm2. As the number of exposures increased, their light output decreased between 24 and 81%, while the control LCU showed only a 4.9% decrease in power and irradiance. The light outputs from the budget LCUs were significantly less than the control LCU, and they were significantly from each other.
Conclusion The budget LCUs tested could not maintain their power, irradiance, and radiant exposure output values as the battery discharged. This supports the recommendation that clinicians should be very cautious when using budget LCUs in their clinical practice.
Keywords
budget light-curing units - light-curing units - battery discharge - power - irradiance - radiant exposurePublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. November 2022
© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Price RB, Ferracane JL, Shortall AC. Light-curing units: a review of what we need to know. J Dent Res 2015; 94 (09) 1179-1186
- 2 Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M, Arrais CAG, Price RBT. Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31 (suppl 1): e61
- 3 Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA, Sullivan B, Kostylev I, Fahey J. Correlation between the beam profile from a curing light and the microhardness of four resins. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (12) 1345-1357
- 4 Haenel T, Hausnerová B, Steinhaus J, Price RB, Sullivan B, Moeginger B. Effect of the irradiance distribution from light curing units on the local micro-hardness of the surface of dental resins. Dent Mater 2015; 31 (02) 93-104
- 5 Shimokawa CAK, Turbino ML, Giannini M, Braga RR, Price RB. Effect of light curing units on the polymerization of bulk fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (08) 1211-1221
- 6 André CB, Nima G, Sebold M, Giannini M, Price RB. Stability of the light output, oral cavity tip accessibility in posterior region and emission spectrum of light-curing units. Oper Dent 2018; 43 (04) 398-407
- 7 Al-Zain AO, Eckert GJ, Lukic H, Megremis S, Platt JA. Polymerization pattern characterization within a resin-based composite cured using different curing units at two distances. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (11) 3995-4010
- 8 Al-Zain AO, Platt JA. Effect of light-curing distance and curing time on composite microflexural strength. Dent Mater J 2021; 40 (01) 202-208
- 9 Al-Zain AO, Marghalani HY. Influence of light-curing distances on Microflexural strength of two resin-based composites. Oper Dent 2022; 45 (03) 297-305
- 10 Ahmadi ED, Hafeji S, Khurshid Z. et al. Biophotonics in dentistry. Appl Sci (Basel) 2022; 6: 89-97
- 11 Price RB. Light-curing units. Dent Advisor 2015; 32: 2-7
- 12 Price RB, Ferracane JL, Darvell BW, Roulet JF. Caveat emptor when purchasing dental products online. J Am Dent Assoc 2022; 153 (03) 196-199
- 13 Shortall AC, Price RB, MacKenzie L, Burke FJ. Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units - Part II. Br Dent J 2016; 221 (09) 551-554
- 14 AlShaafi MM, Harlow JE, Price HL. et al. Emission characteristics and effect of battery drain in “Budget” curing lights. Oper Dent 2016; 41 (04) 397-408
- 15 Osseiran A, Price RB, Dunn D. et al. Buyer beware: curing lights. Dent Econ 2022; 2: 18-23
- 16 Al-Zain AO, Al-Ghamdi ZA, Basahal MM, Al-Bukhary RA, Münchow EA. Performance of multiple light-curing units used by dental students. Open Dent J 2020; 14: 671-680
- 17 Tongtaksin A, Leevailoj C. Battery charge affects the stability of light intensity from light-emitting diode light-curing units. Oper Dent 2017; 42 (05) 497-504
- 18 Shimokawa CA, Turbino ML, Harlow JE, Price HL, Price RB. Light output from six battery operated dental curing lights. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 69: 1036-1042
- 19 Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis Jr JW. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994; 19 (01) 26-32
- 20 ISO10650: Dentistry—Powered polymerization activators. 2018
- 21 Price RBT. Light curing in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2017; 61 (04) 751-778
- 22 Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent 2001; 26 (05) 460-466
- 23 Calheiros FC, Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR. Degree of conversion and mechanical properties of a BisGMA:TEGDMA composite as a function of the applied radiant exposure. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84 (02) 503-509
- 24 Anusavice KJ. PRW. Phillip's Science of Dental Materials. St. Louis, MO: Saunders; 2013
- 25 Malhotra N, Mala K. Light-curing considerations for resin-based composite materials: a review. Part I. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010; 31 (07) 498-505 , quiz 506, 508
