Download PDF
The Journal of Hip Surgery 2022; 06(03): 130-135
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756276
Original Article

Work Relative Value Units for Total Hip Replacement Performed for Osteoarthritis Compared to Fracture

Theodore Quan
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, George Washington Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Matthew J. Best
2   Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland
,
Suresh K. Nayar
2   Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland
,
R. Timothy Kreulen
2   Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland
,
Joseph E. Manzi
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
,
Uma Srikumaran 
2   Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland
,
Savyasachi C. Thakkar
2   Adult Reconstruction Division, Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed in the setting of fracture is associated with greater case complexity, worse outcomes, and increased costs when compared with THA performed for osteoarthritis. Despite the increased complexity, the work relative value units (wRVUs) assigned to THA may not adequately compensate for this difference in surgical effort and time. The purpose of this study was to determine the wRVU per minute rates and reimbursement in dollars per minute for THA performed for fracture compared with THA performed for osteoarthritis. Data were collected through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2018 to identify all patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis or for fractures. Total wRVU, operation time, wRVU per minute, and dollars per minute were assessed between the osteoarthritis and fracture cohorts. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were utilized for the study. The mean operation times for primary THA for osteoarthritis and for fractures were 91.96 and 99.43 minutes, respectively (p < 0.001), resulting in 0.26 versus 0.25 wRVU/min (p < 0.001). THA for osteoarthritis was also valued higher at $9.22/min versus $8.83/min for fracture (p < 0.001). This study shows that wRVU rates and reimbursement in dollars per minute for THA performed in the setting of fracture were lower than THA performed for osteoarthritis. Although patient care remains the number one priority, these findings have important implications in establishing adequate compensation for more complex cases. Level of evidence is III.

Keywords

primary THA - osteoarthritis - fracture - relative value units - operation time


Publication History

Received: 23 October 2021

Accepted: 13 July 2022

Article published online:
07 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Sodhi N, Piuzzi NS, Khlopas A. et al. Are we appropriately compensated by relative value units for primary vs revision total hip arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 340-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Peterson J, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. et al. A comparison of relative value units in primary versus revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (7S(: S39-S42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Quan T, Best MJ, Gu A, Stake S, Golladay GJ, Thakkar SC. Septic revision total hip arthroplasty is not adequately compensated by work relative value units. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (Suppl. 05) 1496-1501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kester BS, Williams J, Bosco JA, Slover JD, Iorio R, Schwarzkopf R. The association between hospital length of stay and 90-day readmission risk for femoral neck fracture patients: within a total joint arthroplasty bundled payment initiative. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (12) 2741-2745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Best MJ, McFarland EG, Anderson GF, Srikumaran U. The likely economic impact of fewer elective surgical procedures on US hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgery 2020; 168 (05) 962-967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Best MJ, Aziz KT, McFarland EG, Anderson GF, Srikumaran U. Economic implications of decreased elective orthopaedic and musculoskeletal surgery volume during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Int Orthop 2020; 44 (11) 2221-2228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schairer WW, Lane JM, Halsey DA, Iorio R, Padgett DE, McLawhorn AS. The Frank Stinchfield Award : total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture is not a typical DRG 470: a propensity-matched cohort study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (02) 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sassoon A, D'Apuzzo M, Sems S, Cass J, Mabry T. Total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: comparing in-hospital mortality, complications, and disposition to an elective patient population. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (09) 1659-1662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Malik AT, Khan SN, Ly TV, Phieffer L, Quatman CE. The “hip fracture” bundle-experiences, challenges, and opportunities. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2020; 11: 2151459320910846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Charette RS, Sloan M, Lee GC. Not all hip arthroplasties are created equal: increased complications and re-admissions after total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures compared with osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (6_Supple_B): 84-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tornero E, García-Oltra E, García-Ramiro S. et al. Prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int J Artif Organs 2012; 35 (10) 884-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Trickey AW, Wright JM, Donovan J. et al. Interrater reliability of hospital readmission evaluations for surgical patients. Am J Med Qual 2017; 32 (02) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bohl DD, Ondeck NT, Darrith B, Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Della Valle CJ. Impact of operative time on adverse events following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (07) 2256-2262.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Surace P, Sultan AA, George J. et al. The association between operative time and short-term complications in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 89,802 surgeries. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (03) 426-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 American Medical Association. Summary: 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Quality Payment Program final rule. Accessed June 20, 2021, at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2018-11/pfs-qpp-final-rule-sum11-8.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sodhi N, Dalton SE, Garbarino LJ. et al. Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7 (04) 74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Abboud JA, Patel RV, Booth Jr RE, Nazarian DG. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty are similar for patients with displaced femoral neck fractures and osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (421) 151-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Le Manach Y, Collins G, Bhandari M. et al. Outcomes after hip fracture surgery compared with elective total hip replacement. JAMA 2015; 314 (11) 1159-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lombardi B, Paci M, Nannetti L, Moretti S, Maritato M, Benelli G. Total hip arthroplasty after hip fracture or osteoarthritis: are there differences in characteristics and outcomes in the early rehabilitative stage?. Orthop Nurs 2014; 33 (01) 43-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Samuel LT, Grits D, Acuña AJ, Piuzzi NS, Higuera-Rueda CA, Kamath AF. Work relative value units do not adequately support the burden of infection management in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (03) 230-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar