Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2022; 13(03): 152-169
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755304
Systematic Review

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

Partha Pal
1   Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Mohan Ramchandani
1   Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Pradev Inavolu
1   Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
1   Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Manu Tandan
1   Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.

Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.

Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.

Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.

Authors' Contribution

M.R. and P.P. did the conceptualization, literature review, and wrote the original draft. P.I. and M.R. worked on illustrations and images. M.T., M.R., P.P., D.N.R., and P.I. did the proof reading and critical review. M.R., P.P., P.I., D.N.R., and M.T. approved the final manuscript.


Funding

None.




Publication History

Article published online:
13 September 2022

© 2022. Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India