PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(03): 677-680
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750356
Letter to the Editor

An Electronic Communication Workflow Optimization for Inpatient Specialist Consultation at an Academic Health Care System

Maiah Zarrabi
1   Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Leesa Li-Fossum
1   Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Betty Tseng
2   Information Services and Solutions, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Kelly Lockett
2   Information Services and Solutions, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Arash Shamsian
2   Information Services and Solutions, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Myung Shin Sim
3   Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Daniel M. Kozman
3   Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Mindy K. Ross
1   Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding This research was supported by NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI Grant Number UL1TR001881.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Background and Significance

Specialist team consultation is a mainstay of modern medical practice due to the increased complexity of inpatient medicine. Timely consultation can be crucial to patient assessment and treatment plans[1]; however, delayed consultation can occur due to communication barriers.[2] Communication for specialist consultation in the inpatient setting is often dependent upon the use of hospital phone operators, pager devices, and web-based systems that are separate from the electronic health record (EHR).[3] Given the growing amount of multidisciplinary care, limited human resources, and time constraints, it is advantageous to eliminate inefficiencies in communication wherever possible.

The adoption of inpatient technology-based EHR solutions for inpatient communication has been explored to address these inefficiencies.[4] Weigert et al demonstrated that a web-paging system standardized with required fields improved user satisfaction.[5] Other efforts have demonstrated potential for decreased errors, including permanent team pager numbers, care team identification, and messaging platforms.[6] [7] [8] [9] One system to contact consultants directly improved team communication,[10] though there is still need for further research to determine the most effective method for consulting specialists, and what the impact would be on time to consult by directly reaching consultants through the EHR.

* Co-first authors.


** Co-senior authors.


Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, and was reviewed by UCLA Institutional Review Board.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 31. Januar 2022

Angenommen: 05. Mai 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Juli 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Stevens JP, Nyweide D, Maresh S. et al. Variation in inpatient consultation among older adults in the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (07) 992-999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Silva SA, Valácio RA, Botelho FC, Amaral CF. Reasons for discharge delays in teaching hospitals. Rev Saude Publica 2014; 48 (02) 314-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shieh L, Chi J, Kulik C. et al. Assigning a team-based pager for on-call physicians reduces paging errors in a large academic hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2014; 40 (02) 77-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Silow-Carroll S, Edwards JN, Rodin D. Using electronic health records to improve quality and efficiency: the experiences of leading hospitals. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2012; 17: 1-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Weigert RM, Schmitz AH, Soung PJ, Porada K, Weisgerber MC. Improving standardization of paging communication using quality improvement methodology. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (04) e20181362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chandiramani A, Gervasio J, Johnson M, Kolek J, Zibrat S, Edelson D. ‘Who's covering this patient?’ Developing a first-contact provider (FCP) designation in an electronic health record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018; 44 (02) 107-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Saleem JJ, Frankel RM, Doebbeling BN, Patterson ES. Patterns in patient safety with computerized consult management and clinical documentation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care 2014:134–141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dalal AK, Schnipper JL. Care team identification in the electronic health record: a critical first step for patient-centered communication. J Hosp Med 2016; 11 (05) 381-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dalal AK, Schnipper J, Massaro A. et al. A web-based and mobile patient-centered “microblog” messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (e1): e178-e184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Theparee T, Shanes E, Maurer D. et al. A new era in pathology consultation: the mypathologist electronic consultation tool. Acad Pathol 2018; 5: 2374289518798820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stevens JP, Johansson AC, Schonberg MA, Howell MD. Elements of a high-quality inpatient consultation in the intensive care unit. A qualitative study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10 (03) 220-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rahman AS, Shi S, Meza PK, Jia JL, Svec D, Shieh L. Waiting it out: consultation delays prolong in-patient length of stay. Postgrad Med J 2019; 95 (1119): 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Eschenroeder HC, Manzione LC, Adler-Milstein J. et al. Associations of physician burnout with organizational electronic health record support and after-hours charting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 960-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Guo U, Chen L, Mehta PH. Electronic health record innovations: helping physicians - one less click at a time. Health Inf Manag 2017; 46 (03) 140-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Williams MS. Misdiagnosis: burnout, moral injury, and implications for the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 1047-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Saag HS, Shah K, Jones SA, Testa PA, Horwitz LI. Pajama time: working after work in the electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (09) 1695-1696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar