CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer 2022; 11(03): 249-255
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750187
Original Article
Lung Cancer

Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

Shivani Sharma*
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Sourav K. Mishra*
2   Department of Medical Oncology, SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
,
Mohit Bhardwaj*
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Shilpy Jha
3   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
,
Matthew Geller
4   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Washington County Pathologists, PC Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
,
Aditi Dewan
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Ekta Jain
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Mallika Dixit
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Deepika Jain
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Gauri Munjal
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Shivmurti Kumar
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, CORE Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
3   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Advanced Medical Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Zoom Image
Sambit K. Mohanty

Objective Repressor of Silencing (ROS1) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe.

Statistical Analysis The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated.

Results A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120–270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71–99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79–89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18–5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01–0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86–90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74–98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively.

ConclusionROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas.

Disclosure of Funding/Support

None.


Note

This study has been presented as a poster in the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer World Conference on Lung Cancer in Barcelona, Spain, September 7–10, 2019.


Authors' Contributions

S. K. Mohanty, S. Sharma, and S. K. Mishra contributed to conceptualization and designing. S. K. Mohanty, S. K. Mishra, S. Sharma, and M. Bhardwaj were involved in the development of methodology. S. K. Mohanty, S. Sharma, M. Bhardwaj, E. Jain, A. Kumar, M. Dixit, D. Jain, and S. Jha acquired the data. S. K. Mohanty, S. Sharma, S. Kumar, S. Jha, and S. K. Mishra analyzed the data. S. Sharma, M. Geller, M. Bhardwaj, S. K. Mohanty, and S. K. Mishra interpreted the data. S. Sharma, M. Geller, M. Bhardwaj, S. K. Mohanty, S. Jha, and S. K. Mishra were involved in writing and review/revision of the manuscript. S. Kumar and M. Bhardwaj provided technical support. S. K. Mohanty and M. Geller supervised the study.


* SS, SKM, and MB share the first authorship.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. Juni 2022

© 2022. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 GLOBOCAN. 2020 . Accessed May 13, 2022. from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf
  • 2 Davies KD, Le AT, Theodoro MF. et al. Identifying and targeting ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18 (17) 4570-4579
  • 3 Rikova K, Guo A, Zeng Q. et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 2007; 131 (06) 1190-1203
  • 4 Matsuura S, Shinmura K, Kamo T. et al. CD74-ROS1 fusion transcripts in resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2013; 30 (04) 1675-1680
  • 5 Rimkunas VM, Crosby KE, Li D. et al. Analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase ROS1-positive tumors in non-small cell lung cancer: identification of a FIG-ROS1 fusion. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18 (16) 4449-4457
  • 6 Bubendorf L, Büttner R, Al-Dayel F. et al. Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations. Virchows Arch 2016; 469 (05) 489-503
  • 7 Uguen A, De Braekeleer M. ROS1 fusions in cancer: a review. Future Oncol 2016; 12 (16) 1911-1928
  • 8 Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Ou SH. et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (08) 863-870
  • 9 Lin JJ, Ritterhouse LL, Ali SM. et al. ROS1 fusions rarely overlap with other oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12 (05) 872-877
  • 10 Varella-Garcia M, Yoshida A. ROS1 testing with fish. In: Tsao MS, Hirsch FR, Yatabe Y. eds. IASLC Atlas of ALK and ROS1 Testing in Lung Cancer. 2nd ed. Aurora, CO: IASLC Editorial Rx Press; 2016: 53-62
  • 11 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines), Non small cell lung cancer, Version 2.2021- December 15, 2020. Accessed May 13, 2022 at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nsclc.pdf
  • 12 Scholl L, Yoshida A, Nicholson A. et al. ROS1 testing with IHC. In: Tsao MS, Hirsch FR, Yatabe Y, eds. IASLC Atlas of ALK and ROS1 Testing in Lung Cancer. 2nd ed. Aurora, CO: IASLC Editorial Rx Press; 2016: 35-40
  • 13 Huang RSP, Smith D, Le CH. et al. Correlation of ROS1 immunohistochemistry with ROS1 fusion status determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144 (06) 735-741
  • 14 Shan L, Lian F, Guo L. et al. Detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison of IHC, FISH and real-time RT-PCR. PLoS One 2015; 10 (03) e0120422
  • 15 Cao B, Wei P, Liu Z. et al. Detection of lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 rearrangement by IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR and analysis of its clinicopathologic features. OncoTargets Ther 2015; 9: 131-138
  • 16 Sholl LM, Sun H, Butaney M. et al. ROS1 immunohistochemistry for detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37 (09) 1441-1449
  • 17 Cha YJ, Lee JS, Kim HR. et al. Screening of ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry and comparison with ALK rearrangements. PLoS One 2014; 9 (07) e103333
  • 18 Mescam-Mancini L, Lantuéjoul S, Moro-Sibilot D. et al. On the relevance of a testing algorithm for the detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 2014; 83 (02) 168-173
  • 19 Wu J, Lin Y, He X. et al. Comparison of detection methods and follow-up study on the tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with ROS1 fusion rearrangement. BMC Cancer 2016; 16: 599
  • 20 Selinger CI, Li BT, Pavlakis N. et al. Screening for ROS1 gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancers using immunohistochemistry with FISH confirmation is an effective method to identify this rare target. Histopathology 2017; 70 (03) 402-411
  • 21 Viola P, Maurya M, Croud J. et al. A validation study for the use of ROS1 immunohistochemical staining in screening for ROS1 translocations in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11 (07) 1029-1039
  • 22 Shaw AT, Ou SH, Bang YJ. et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (21) 1963-1971
  • 23 Jang JS, Wang X, Vedell PT. et al. Custom gene capture and next-generation sequencing to resolve discordant ALK status by FISH and IHC in lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11 (11) 1891-1900
  • 24 Boyle TA, Masago K, Ellison KE, Yatabe Y, Hirsch FR. ROS1 immunohistochemistry among major genotypes of non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2015; 16 (02) 106-111