Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750115
Patient Prosthesis Mismatch

Abstract
Concept of patient prosthesis mismatch came into existence from 1978 onward when Rahimtoola first defined it as “mismatch can be considered to be present when the effective prosthetic valve area, after insertion into the patient, is less than that of a normal human valve.” Patient prosthesis mismatch produces higher than expected pressure gradient through normally functioning valve. Since insertion of first ball caged mechanical valve in descending aorta by Dr. Charles Hufnagel in 1952, prosthetic valve had undergone tremendous improvement in terms of valve design, hemodynamics, durability, and thrombogenicity. Despite these marked changes in valve design, prosthetic valves are still subjected to inherent complications.
Publication History
Article published online:
01 June 2022
© 2022. Official Publication of The Simulation Society (TSS), accredited by International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound (ISCU). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 2006; 92 (08) 1022-1029
- 2 Edmunds Jr LH. Evolution of prosthetic heart valves. Am Heart J 2001; 141 (05) 849-855
- 3 Yacoub MH, Takkenberg JJ. Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world?. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2 (02) 60-61
- 4 Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI. et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33 (04) 523-528
- 5 Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N. et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53 (01) 39-47
- 6 Coisne A, Ninni S, Edmé JL. et al. Obesity paradox in the clinical significance of effective prosthetic orifice area after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12 (01) 208-210
- 7 Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch, 1978 to 2011: from original concept to compelling evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60 (13) 1136-1139
- 8 Kohsaka S, Mohan S, Virani S. et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135 (05) 1076-1080
- 9 Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM. et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106 (01) 14-22
- 10 Dayan V, Vignolo G, Soca G, Paganini JJ, Brusich D, Pibarot P. Predictors and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9 (08) 924-933
- 11 Nombela-Franco L, Ruel M, Radhakrishnan S. et al. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN aortic valves inserted by catheter for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111 (07) 1026-1033
- 12 Abdel-Wahab M, Mehilli J, Frerker C. et al; CHOICE investigators. Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the CHOICE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311 (15) 1503-1514
- 13 Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 11 (04, Suppl 1): 114-120
- 14 Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M. et al. Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (04) 1107-1113
- 15 Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Métras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7 (02) 211-218
- 16 Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG. et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127 (01) 149-159
- 17 Vincentelli A, Susen S, Le Tourneau T. et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (04) 343-349
- 18 Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000; 102 (19, Suppl 3): III5-III9
- 19 Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR. et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (06) 1822-1829 , discussion 1829