Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2022; 14(02): e147-e152
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750021
Research Article

Predictive Factors of Research Productivity among Ophthalmology Residents: A Benchmark Analysis

Abraham Hang 
1   Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Tejus Pradeep
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Hassan Jessani
1   Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Gagan Kalra
3   Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
,
Evan L. Waxman
4   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
Matthew Zhang
5   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
,
Roxana Fu
4   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Positive and negative associations between prior publications and future research productivity is described in other fields, but no such analysis exists for ophthalmology. We conducted a study to determine characteristics of residents exhibiting research productivity during residency.

Methods Using San Francisco Match and Program Web sites, a roster of ophthalmology residents in 2019 to 2020 was compiled, and publication data was collected via PubMed and Google Scholar on a random sample of 100 third-year residents.

Results The median number of publications generated by ophthalmology residents before residency is 2 (range 0–13). Thirty-seven, 23, and 40 residents had zero, one, and two or more papers published during residency, respectively, with a median of 1 (range 0–14). On univariate analysis, compared with residents who published zero or one paper, those who published ≥ 2 were more likely to have more preresidency publications (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; p = 0.005), attend a top-25 ranked residency program by multiple metrics including Doximity reputation (OR 4.92; p < 0.001), and have attended a top-25 ranked medical school program by U.S. News and World Report (OR 3.24; p = 0.03). However, on adjusted analyses, the only factor that remained significant for predicting publications in residency was whether the residency program attended was top 25 ranked (OR 3.54; p = 0.009).

Discussion/Conclusion With the advent of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 pass/fail system, greater emphasis will be placed on other metrics, including research. This is the first benchmark analysis examining factors predictive of publication productivity in ophthalmology residents. Our study suggests that the residency program attended, not the medical school attended or prior publication history, plays an influential role in the number of publications produced during residency, highlighting the importance of factors to support research on the institutional level, such as mentorship and funding, rather than historical factors in research productivity by the resident.

Keywords

medical school - residency - research productivity - publications


Publication History

Received: 31 August 2021

Accepted: 16 March 2022

Article published online:
27 July 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Report ORMS. . SF Match Residency and Fellowship Matching Services; 2020
    PubMed
  • 2 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138 (05) 460-466
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Federation of State Medical Boards. USMLE Program Announces Upcoming Policy Changes. Published 2020. Accessed October 16, 2020 at: https://www.fsmb.org/advocacy/news-releases/usmle-program-announces-upcoming-policy-changes/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chaudhry HJ, Katsufrakis PJ, Tallia AF. The USMLE Step 1 decision: an opportunity for medical education and training. JAMA 2020; 323 (20) 2017-2018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (04) 865-870
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Driver TH, Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in ophthalmology residency for international medical graduates. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (04) 974-975.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Siatkowski RM, Mian SI, Culican SM. et al; Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. Probability of success in the ophthalmology residency match: three-year outcomes analysis of San Francisco Matching Program Data. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e150-e157
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Quillen DA, Siatkowski RM, Feldon S. of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. COVID-19 and the ophthalmology match. Ophthalmology 2021; 128 (02) 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hirsch JE. Does the H index have predictive power?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104 (49) 19193-19198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Campbell ST, Gupta R, Avedian RS. The effect of applicant publication volume on the orthopaedic residency match. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (03) 490-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (05) 1041-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gilmore JL, To D-L. Evaluating academic productivity and quality. New Dir Institutional Res 1992; 1992 (75) 35-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW. et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18 (09) 711-716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco Jr J, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA 1997; 278 (09) 723-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dixon AK. Publishing and academic promotion. Singapore Med J 2009; 50 (09) 847-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Todisco A, Souza RF, Gores GJ. Trains, tracks, and promotion in an academic medical center. Gastroenterology 2011; 141 (05) 1545-1548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yousuf SJ, Kwagyan J, Jones LS. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Thompson RH, Lohse CM, Husmann DA, Leibovich BC, Gettman MT. Predictors of scholarly productivity, pursuit of fellowship, and academic practice among urology residents using medical student application materials. Urology 2018; 120: 49-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Grewal NS, Spoon DB, Kawamoto HK. et al. Predictive factors in identifying subspecialty fellowship applicants who will have academic practices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (04) 1264-1271 , discussion 1272–1263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 John AM, Gupta AB, John ES, Lopez SA, Lee B, Lambert WC. The impact of fellowship training on scholarly productivity in academic dermatology. Cutis 2016; 97 (05) 353-358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wiggins MN. Misrepresentation by ophthalmology residency applicants. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128 (07) 906-910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Way SF, Morgan AC, Larremore DB, Clauset A. Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116 (22) 10729-10733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar