PDF herunterladen
The Journal of Hip Surgery 2022; 06(02): 049-057
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749440
Invited Review

An Australian Algorithm to Guide the Surgical Management of Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Multi-Disciplinary Team Approach

Melinda Jiang 
1   College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
,
James Sires
1   College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
Santhosh Daniel
1   College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
3   Department of Infectious Diseases, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
Matthew B. Roberts
3   Department of Infectious Diseases, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
,
Christopher Wilson
1   College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a leading cause of failure for total joint arthroplasty. Historically, two-stage revision arthroplasty has been considered the gold standard approach to chronic PJI, however, emerging evidence suggests that one-stage revision arthroplasty may be underutilized. To our knowledge, there have been no previously published guidelines for the surgical management of chronic PJI in Australia, resulting in significant heterogeneity in management within and across centers. We aim to review contemporary concepts in the surgical management of PJI and develop an evidence-based algorithm to optimize the management of chronic hip and knee PJI, incorporating a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. A review was conducted to identify existing articles discussing surgical management of chronic PJI, specifically contraindications to one-stage revision arthroplasty. Absolute contraindications for one-stage revision include difficulty in treating organisms, significant soft tissue compromise, and concurrent sepsis. Relative contraindications include lack of preoperative identification of organism, presence of a sinus tract, fungal infections, significant bone loss, and immunocompromise. In determining the management of patients with a relative contraindication, MDT discussion with the consideration of patient's overall local, host, and microbiological profile is necessary. Using gathered evidence, absolute and relative contraindications for one-stage revision arthroplasty were developed into an algorithm. The algorithm is designed to assist our PJI MDT in making optimized decisions when choosing between a one-stage versus two-stage approach. Ongoing follow-up is underway to determine the effect of implementing this algorithm on patient outcomes, eradication rates, and revision rates within our center.

Keywords

prosthetic joint infection - periprosthetic joint infection - protocol - algorithm


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. September 2021

Angenommen: 04. April 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Juni 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dale H, Fenstad AM, Hallan G. et al. Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (05) 449-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Ad Hoc Report No.:2807, procedures from 1 Sept 1999–31 December 2018. Adelaide: AOANJRR Database; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Wilson CJ, Georgiou KR, Oburu E, Theodoulou A, Deakin AH, Krishnan J. Surgical site infection in overweight and obese total knee arthroplasty patients. J Orthop 2018; 15 (02) 328-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jämsen E, Nevalainen P, Eskelinen A, Huotari K, Kalliovalkama J, Moilanen T. Obesity, diabetes, and preoperative hyperglycemia as predictors of periprosthetic joint infection: a single-center analysis of 7181 primary hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (14) e101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dowsey MM, Choong PFM. Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (06) 1577-1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, Lodenkämper H, Röttger J, Siegel A. Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981; 63-B (03) 342-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lange J, Troelsen A, Thomsen RW, Søballe K. Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 57-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jackson WO, Schmalzried TP. Limited role of direct exchange arthroplasty in the treatment of infected total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (381) 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yaghmour KM, Chisari E, Khan WS. Single-stage revision surgery in infected total knee arthroplasty: a PRISMA systematic review. J Clin Med 2019; 8 (02) 174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van den Kieboom J, Tirumala V, Box H, Oganesyan R, Klemt C, Kwon YM. One-stage revision is as effective as two-stage revision for chronic culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (03) 515-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lum ZC, Holland CT, Meehan JP. Systematic review of single stage revision for prosthetic joint infection. World J Orthop 2020; 11 (12) 559-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zimmerli W. Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection. J Intern Med 2014; 276 (02) 111-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4 (07) 482-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Manning L, Metcalf S, Clark B. et al. Clinical characteristics, etiology, and initial management strategy of newly diagnosed periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of 783 patients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 7 (05) a068
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Parkinson RW, Kay PR, Rawal A. A case for one-stage revision in infected total knee arthroplasty?. Knee 2011; 18 (01) 1-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Merollini KM, Crawford RW, Graves N. Surgical treatment approaches and reimbursement costs of surgical site infections post hip arthroplasty in Australia: a retrospective analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 (01) 91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S. Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 8-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Awad F, Searle D, Walmsley K. et al. The Exeter Knee Infection Multi Disciplinary Team approach to managing prosthetic knee infections: a qualitative analysis. J Orthop 2019; 18: 86-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Moore AJ, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Gooberman-Hill R. Managing uncertainty—a qualitative study of surgeons' decision-making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ntalos D, Berger-Groch J, Rohde H. et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference affects the treatment plan in prosthetic joint infections of the hip: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (04) 467-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Visvanathan A, Wilson C, Jackman E, Wong G, Krishnan J. Design, construction, and early results of a formal local revision knee arthroplasty registry. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (12) 1284-1295
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Giulieri SG, Graber P, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W. Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm. Infection 2004; 32 (04) 222-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Betsch BY, Eggli S, Siebenrock KA, Täuber MG, Mühlemann K. Treatment of joint prosthesis infection in accordance with current recommendations improves outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46 (08) 1221-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sukeik M, Haddad FS. Periprosthetic joint infections after total hip replacement: an algorithmic approach. SICOT J 2019; 5: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Diagnosis and Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections Clinical Practice Guideline. Published March 11, 2019 at: https://www.aaos.org/pjiguideline
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Bragan Turner E, Liew S. et al. Variation in prosthetic joint infection and treatment strategies during 4.5 years of follow-up after primary joint arthroplasty using administrative data of 41397 patients across Australian, European and United States hospitals. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR. et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56 (01) e1-e25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lichstein P, Gehrke T, Lombardi A. et al. One-stage versus two-stage exchange. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (Suppl. 01) S141-S146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gehrke T, Zahar A, Kendoff D. One-stage exchange: it all began here. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11, suppl A): 77-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Thakrar RR, Horriat S, Kayani B, Haddad FS. Indications for a single-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (1_supple_A): 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rowan FE, Donaldson MJ, Pietrzak JR, Haddad FS. The role of one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2018; 11 (03) 370-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Villa JM, Pannu TS, Piuzzi N, Riesgo AM, Higuera CA. Evolution of diagnostic definitions for periprosthetic joint infection in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (3S): S9-S13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Malizos KN, Varitimidis SE. Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Elsevier: 2017: 133-156
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Yang JJ, Maloney NJ, Nguyen KA, Worswick S, Smogorzewski J, Bach DQ. Sweet syndrome as an adverse reaction to tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2021; 34 (01) e14461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bernard L, Arvieux C, Brunschweiler B. et al. Antibiotic therapy for 6 or 12 weeks for prosthetic joint infection. N Engl J Med 2021; 384 (21) 1991-2001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Haddad FS, Masri BA, Campbell D, McGraw RW, Beauchamp CP, Duncan CP. The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (06) 807-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Minassian AM, Osmon DR, Berendt AR. Clinical guidelines in the management of prosthetic joint infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69 (Suppl. 01) i29-i35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Société de Pathologie Infectieuse de Langue Française (SPILF), Collège des Universitaires de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales (CMIT), Groupe de Pathologie Infectieuse Pédiatrique (GPIP), Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR), Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique (SOFCOT), Société Française d'Hygiène Hospitalière (SFHH), Société Française de Médecine Nucléaire (SFMN), Société Française de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation (SOFMER), Société Française de Microbiologie (SFM), Société Française de Radiologie (SFR-Rad), Société Française de Rhumatologie (SFR-Rhu). Recommendations for bone and joint prosthetic device infections in clinical practice (prosthesis, implants, osteosynthesis). Med Mal Infect 2010; 40 (04) 185-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Esposito S, Leone S, Bassetti M. et al; Bone Joint Infections Committee for the Italian Society of Infectious Tropical Diseases (SIMIT). Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and infectious disease management of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections in adults. Infection 2009; 37 (06) 478-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (16) 1645-1654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315 (08) 801-810
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Leone S, Borrè S, Monforte Ad. et al; GISIG (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Infezioni Gravi) Working Group on Prosthetic Joint Infections. Consensus document on controversial issues in the diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic joint infections. Int J Infect Dis 2010; 14 (Suppl. 04) S67-S77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bozhkova S, Tikhilov R, Labutin D. et al. Failure of the first step of two-stage revision due to polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection of the hip. J Orthop Traumatol 2016; 17 (04) 369-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Jenny JY, Lengert R, Diesinger Y, Gaudias J, Boeri C, Kempf JF. Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (12) 2477-2481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Lange J, Troelsen A, Solgaard S, Otte KS, Jensen NK, Søballe K. CORIHA Research Group. Cementless one-stage revision in chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection. Ninety-one percent infection free survival in 56 patients at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (04) 1160-1165.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rudelli S, Uip D, Honda E, Lima AL. One-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty with bone graft. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (08) 1165-1177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Raut VV, Siney PD, Wroblewski BM. One-stage revision of infected total hip replacements with discharging sinuses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76 (05) 721-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Białecki J, Kogut M, Chaberek S. et al. Two-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic hip infections with severe bone loss: results from 182 cases. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2020; 12 (02) 8545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pattyn C, De Geest T, Ackerman P, Audenaert E. Preformed gentamicin spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: functional results and complications. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (10) 1471-1476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Faschingbauer M, Reichel H, Bieger R, Kappe T. Mechanical complications with one hundred and thirty eight (antibiotic-laden) cement spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (05) 989-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Fink B, Schlumberger M, Oremek D. Single-stage acetabular revision during two-stage THA revision for infection is effective in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (08) 2063-2070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M. Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (403) 8-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Wolf M, Clar H, Friesenbichler J. et al. Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (07) 1363-1368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bori G, Muñoz-Mahamud E, Cuñé J, Gallart X, Fuster D, Soriano A. One-stage revision arthroplasty using cementless stem for infected hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 1076-1081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Ochsner PE. et al. One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: outcome of 39 consecutive hips. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (05) 913-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Greenfield B, Jones HW, Siney P, Kay P, Purbach B, Board TN. Is pre-operative identification of the infecting organism essential before single stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic infection?. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (02) 705-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Brooks DH, Pupparo F. Successful salvage of a primary total knee arthroplasty infected with Candida parapsilosis. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (06) 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Simonian PT, Brause BD, Wickiewicz TL. Candida infection after total knee arthroplasty. Management without resection or amphotericin B. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (07) 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Langer P, Kassim RA, Macari GS, Saleh KJ. Aspergillus infection after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2003; 32 (08) 402-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Jakobs O, Schoof B, Klatte TO. et al. Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2015; 7 (01) 5623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Belden K, Cao L, Chen J. et al. Hip and knee section, fungal periprosthetic joint infection, diagnosis and treatment: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (2S): S387-S391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Gebauer M, Frommelt L, Achan P. et al. Management of fungal or atypical periprosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (Suppl. 01) S147-S151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Srivastava K, Bozic KJ, Silverton C, Nelson AJ, Makhni EC, Davis JJ. Reconsidering strategies for managing chronic periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: using decision analytics to find the optimal strategy between one-stage and two-stage total knee revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (01) 14-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Knebel C, Menzemer J, Pohlig F. et al. Peri-prosthetic joint infection of the knee causes high levels of psychosocial distress: a prospective cohort study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020; 21 (10) 877-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Winkler H. Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft. Int J Med Sci 2009; 6 (05) 247-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Diaz-Ledezma C, Higuera CA, Parvizi J. Success after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a Delphi-based international multidisciplinary consensus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (07) 2374-2382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Kildow BJ, Della-Valle CJ, Springer BD. Single vs 2-stage revision for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35 (3S): S24-S30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27 (02) 302-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar