Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35(04): 306-315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748887
Review Article

Mesentery in Transanal TME

Joep Knol
1   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ZOL Hospital, Genk, Belgium
,
Sami A. Chadi
2   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Oncological adequacy in rectal cancer surgery mandates not only a clear distal and circumferential resection margin but also resection of the entire ontogenetic mesorectal package. Incomplete removal of the mesentery is one of the commonest causes of local recurrences. The completeness of the resection is not only determined by tumor and patient related factors but also by the patient-tailored treatment selected by the multidisciplinary team. This is performed in the context of the technical ability and experience of the surgeon to ensure an optimal total mesorectal excision (TME). In TME, popularized by Professor Heald in the early 1980s as a sharp dissection through the avascular embryologic plane, the midline pedicle of tumor and mesorectum is separated from the surrounding, mostly paired structures of the retroperitoneum. Although TME significantly improved the oncological and functional results of rectal cancer surgery, the difficulty of the procedure is still mainly dependent on and determined by the dissection of the most distal part of the rectum and mesorectum. To overcome some of the limitations of working in the narrowest part of the pelvis, robotic and transanal surgery have been shown to improve the access and quality of resection in minimally invasive techniques. Whatever technique is chosen to perform a TME, embryologically derived planes and anatomical points of reference should be identified to guide the surgery. Standardization of the chosen technique, widespread education, and training of surgeons, as well as caseloads per surgeon, are important factors to optimize outcomes. In this article, we discuss the introduction of transanal TME, with emphasis on the mesentery, relevant anatomy, standard procedural steps, and importance of a training pathway.

Keywords

rectal cancer - mesentery - total mesorectal excision - transanal total mesorectal excision


Publication History

Article published online:
10 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Höckel M. Cancer permeates locally within ontogenetic compartments: clinical evidence and implications for cancer surgery. Future Oncol 2012; 8 (01) 29-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Höckel M, Horn LC, Manthey N. et al. Resection of the embryologically defined uterovaginal (Müllerian) compartment and pelvic control in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10 (07) 683-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rodríguez-Luna MR, Guarneros-Zárate JE, Tueme-Izaguirre J. Total mesorectal excision, an erroneous anatomical term for the gold standard in rectal cancer treatment. Int J Surg 2015; 23 (Pt A): 97-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dattani M, Santiago I, Mahadevan V, Heald RJ. The mesorectum and mesocolon - Making sense of words. Int J Surg 2016; 36 ( Pt A): 390-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Heald RJ. The ‘holy plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 1988; 81 (09) 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ. Cooperative investigators of the Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Group. Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (09) 1142-1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Martling A, Holm T, Rutqvist LE. et al. Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm. Br J Surg 2005; 92 (02) 225-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J. et al; Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (07) 857-866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brown G, Kirkham A, Williams GT. et al. High-resolution MRI of the anatomy important in total mesorectal excision of the rectum. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (02) 431-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Taylor FGM, Quirke P, Heald RJ. et al; Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer European Equivalence Study Group. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32 (01) 34-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Syk E, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B. Local recurrence in rectal cancer: anatomic localization and effect on radiation target. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72 (03) 658-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Monson JRT, Weiser MR, Buie WD. et al; Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (05) 535-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH. Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20 (07) 1729-1734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J. et al; MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators, NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2009; 373 (9666): 821-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bondeven P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Laurberg S, Pedersen BG. Extent and completeness of mesorectal excision evaluated by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2013; 100 (10) 1357-1367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ. et al. Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (01) 94-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lichliter WE. Techniques in total mesorectal excision surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2015; 28 (01) 21-27
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Knol JJ, Wexner SD, Vangertruyden G. Laparoscopic mobilization of the splenic flexure: the use of color-grading as a unique teaching tool. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (03) 734-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Garcia-Granero A, Primo Romaguera V, Millan M. et al. A video guide of five access methods to the splenic flexure: the concept of the splenic flexure box. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (06) 2763-2772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Araujo SEA, Seid VE, Kim NJ, Bertoncini AB, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Assessing the extent of colon lengthening due to splenic flexure mobilization techniques: a cadaver study. Arq Gastroenterol 2012; 49 (03) 219-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thum-umnuaysuk S, Boonyapibal A, Geng YY, Pattana-Arun J. Lengthening of the colon for low rectal anastomosis in a cadaveric study: how much can we gain?. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17 (04) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lindsey I, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Denonvilliers' fascia lies anterior to the fascia propria and rectal dissection plane in total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA. et al; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (14) 1324-1332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M. et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 2009; 146 (03) 483-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Knol J, Keller DS. Total mesorectal excision technique – past, present, and future. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33 (03) 134-143
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (05) 560-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Brannigan AE, De Buck S, Suetens P, Penninckx F, D'Hoore A. Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: overcoming a challenge. Surg Endosc 2006; 20 (06) 952-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (09) 2200-2205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (05) 1205-1210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Masoni L, Masoni L. The reality of radical sphincter preservation surgery for cancer of the distal 3 cm of rectum following high-dose radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27 (04) 779-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Knol JJ, D'Hondt M, Souverijns G, Heald B, Vangertruyden G. Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below–a preliminary report. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (04) 221-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Knol J, Chadi SA. Transanal total mesorectal excision: technical aspects of approaching the mesorectal plane from below. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016; 25 (05) 257-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Koedam TWA, Veltcamp Helbach M, Penna M. et al. Short-term outcomes of transanal completion total mesorectal excision (cTaTME) for rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (01) 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sylla P, Knol JJ, D'Andrea AP. et al; International taTME Urethral Injury Collaborative. International taTME Urethral Injury Collaborative. Urethral injury and other urologic injuries during transanal total mesorectal excision: an international collaborative study. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (02) e115-e125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jenner DC, de Boer WB, Clarke G, Levitt MD. Rectal washout eliminates exfoliated malignant cells. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (11) 1432-1434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bernardi MP, Bloemendaal AL, Albert M, Whiteford M, Stevenson AR, Hompes R. Transanal total mesorectal excision: dissection tips using ‘O's and ’triangles'. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (11) 775-778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Penna M, Knol JJ, Tuynman JB, Tekkis PP, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R. Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (03) 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Koedam TWA, Veltcamp Helbach M, van de Ven PM. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (04) 279-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Larsen SG, Pfeffer F, Kørner H. Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group. Norwegian moratorium on transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2019; 106 (09) 1120-1121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Deijen CL, Tsai A, Koedam TWA. et al. Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (12) 811-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Roodbeen SX, Spinelli A, Bemelman WA. et al. Local recurrence after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (02) 359-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Caycedo-Marulanda A, Brown CJ, Chadi SA. et al. Canadian taTME expert collaboration (CaTaCO) position statement. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (09) 3748-3753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar