CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35(05): 305-313
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748860
Original Research

Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature in Small Breed Dogs with and without Atlantoaxial Instability Using Computed Tomography

Annina Müller
1   Tierarztpraxis Emmevet AG, Hasle-Rüegsau, Switzerland
2   Division of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
2   Division of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
Beatriz Vidondo
3   Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Liebefeld, Switzerland
,
4   Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
Ángel Hernández-Guerra
5   Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain
,
Ioannis N. Plessas
6   Davies Veterinary Specialists Limited, Manor Farm Business Park, Higham Gobion, Herts, United Kingdom
,
Martin J. Schmidt
7   Clinic for Small Animals, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
,
Christina Precht
8   Division of Clinical Radiology, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in paraspinal musculature between dogs with and without atlantoaxial instability (AAI) using computed tomography scans.

Study Design Retrospective multicentre study evaluating transverse reconstructed computed tomography scans of 83 small breed dogs (34 with and 49 without AAI) for the cross-sectional paraspinal musculature area at three levels (Occiput/C1, mid-C1, mid-C2). Ratio of moments, dorsal-to-ventral muscle-area ratios (d-v-ratio) and ratios of the dorsal and ventral musculature to C2 height (d-C2-ratio and v-C2-ratio) were evaluated for differences between groups using multivariate analysis of variance (p < 0.05) taking the head-neck position into account.

Results Dogs with AAI showed a significantly lower d-v-ratio at levels 2 and 3, d-C2-ratio at level 2 and ratio of moments at all levels. When head-neck positions were analysed separately, ratio of moments was significantly lower in affected dogs at level 1 and 2. Also lower was d-C2-ratio at level 2, but only in flexed positioning. The head-neck position had a significant influence on ratio of moments and d-v-ratio at all three levels and on d-C2-ratio at level 1.

Conclusion Significant changes in muscle area were observed only for the hypaxial muscles at the C1 level, indicating a limited role of muscular adaption in AAI patients. Our results confirm an altered ratio of moments in dogs with AAI. The head-neck position has a significant impact and should be taken into account when evaluating spinal musculature.

Authors' Contributions

A.M., C.P., and F.F. contributed to the conception of the study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation. B.V. contributed to the study analysis and interpretation. M.H.S. contributed to the conception of the study and the evaluation of data. A.M.H., I.N.P., and M.J.S. contributed to the acquisition of data. All authors revised and approved the manuscript before submitting.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 27 May 2021

Accepted: 04 April 2022

Article published online:
07 June 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Denny HR, Gibbs C, Waterman A. Atlanto-axial subluxation in the dog: a review of thirty cases and an evaluation of treatment by lag screw fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29 (01) 37-47
  • 2 Fossum TW. Small Animal Surgery. Elsevier Health Sciences 2018. Accessed April 17, 2022 at: https://books.google.ch/books?id=klBUDwAAQBAJ
  • 3 Geary JC, Oliver JE, Hoerlein BF. Atlanto axial subluxation in the canine. J Small Anim Pract 1967; 8 (10) 577-582
  • 4 Havig ME, Cornell KK, Hawthorne JC, McDonnell JJ, Selcer BA. Evaluation of nonsurgical treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: 19 cases (1992-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227 (02) 257-262
  • 5 Slanina MC. Atlantoaxial instability. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2016; 46 (02) 265-275
  • 6 Waschk MA, Vidondo B, Carrera I. et al. Craniovertebral junction anomalies in small breed dogs with atlantoaxial instability: a multicentre case-control study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32 (01) 33-40
  • 7 Salomon FV, Geyer H, Gille U. Anatomie für die Tiermedizin. 3., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Enke Verlag. 2015
  • 8 Planchamp B, Bluteau J, Stoffel MH, Precht C, Schmidli F, Forterre F. Morphometric and functional study of the canine atlantoaxial joint. Res Vet Sci 2020; 128: 76-85
  • 9 Reber K, Bürki A, Vizcaino Reves N. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the stabilizing function of the atlantoaxial ligaments under shear loading: a canine cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (08) 918-923
  • 10 Parry AT, Upjohn MM, Schlegl K, Kneissl S, Lamb CR. Computed tomography variations in morphology of the canine atlas in dogs with and without atlantoaxial subluxation. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51 (06) 596-600
  • 11 Terena SML, Fernandes KPS, Bussadori SK, Deana AM, Mesquita-Ferrari RA. Systematic review of the synergist muscle ablation model for compensatory hypertrophy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2017; 63 (02) 164-172
  • 12 Boström AF, Lappalainen AK, Danneels L, Jokinen TS, Laitinen-Vapaavuori O, Hielm-Björkman AK. Cross-sectional area and fat content in dachshund epaxial muscles: an MRI and CT reliability study. Vet Rec Open 2018; 5 (01) e000256
  • 13 Brumitt J, Cuddeford T. Current concepts of muscle and tendon adaption to strength and conditioning. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015; 10 (06) 748-759
  • 14 Cain B, Jones JC, Holásková I, Freeman L, Pierce B. Feasibility for measuring transverse area ratios and asymmetry of lumbosacral region paraspinal muscles in working dogs using computed tomography. Front Vet Sci 2016; 3: 34
  • 15 Upchurch JJ, McGonnell IM, Driver CJ, Butler L, Volk HA. Influence of head positioning on the assessment of Chiari-like malformation in Cavalier King Charles spaniels. Vet Rec 2011; 169 (11) 277-277
  • 16 Hartmann K, Düver P, Kaiser S, Fischer C, Forterre F. CT-scan based evaluation of dorsal-to-ventral ratios of paraspinal musculature in chondrodystrophic and non-chondrodystrophic dogs. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 577394
  • 17 Ohtori S, Miyagi M, Inoue G. Sensory nerve ingrowth, cytokines, and instability of discogenic low back pain: a review. Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 2 (01) 11-17
  • 18 Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in structure and function of the back muscles in low back pain: different time points, observations, and mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49 (06) 464-476
  • 19 Park MS, Moon SH, Kim TH. et al. Paraspinal muscles of patients with lumbar diseases. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79 (04) 323-329
  • 20 Hodges P, Holm AK, Hansson T, Holm S. Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury. Spine 2006; 31 (25) 2926-2933
  • 21 Forterre F, Precht C, Riedinger B, Bürki A. Biomechanical properties of the atlantoaxial joint with naturally-occurring instability in a toy breed dog. A comparative descriptive cadaveric study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (05) 355-358
  • 22 Planchamp B, Forterre F, Vidondo B, Beugger A, Müller A, Precht C. Influence of the head neck position on imaging measurements used to assess the craniovertebral junction in small breed dogs: a Cadaveric study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34 (04) 268-278
  • 23 Beaver DP, Ellison GW, Lewis DD, Goring RL, Kubilis PS, Barchard C. Risk factors affecting the outcome of surgery for atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: 46 cases (1978-1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216 (07) 1104-1109
  • 24 Stalin C, Gutierrez-Quintana R, Faller K, Guevar J, Yeamans C, Penderis J. A review of canine atlantoaxial joint subluxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (01) 1-8
  • 25 Sutherland-Smith J, Hutchinson D, Freeman LM. Comparison of computed tomographic attenuation values for epaxial muscles in old and young dogs. Am J Vet Res 2019; 80 (02) 174-177
  • 26 Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Lyons W, Gallagher D, Ross R. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1998; 85 (01) 115-122
  • 27 Lerer A, Nykamp SG, Harriss AB, Gibson TWG, Koch TG, Brown SHM. MRI-based relationships between spine pathology, intervertebral disc degeneration, and muscle fatty infiltration in chondrodystrophic and non-chondrodystrophic dogs. Spine J 2015; 15 (11) 2433-2439