Trends in Distal Radius Fixation Reimbursement, Charge, and Utilization in the Medicare Population

Abstract

Background Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the second most common fragility fracture experienced by the elderly, and surgical management constitutes an appreciable sum of Medicare expenditure for upper extremity surgery. Using Medicare data from 2012 to 2017, our primary aim was to describe temporal changes in surgical treatment, physician payment, and patient charges for DRF fixation.

Methods We examined surgical volumes and retrospective patient charge (services billed by surgeon) and surgeon payment (professional fee) data from 2012 to 2017 for four DRF surgeries: closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of extra-articular fractures, ORIF of intra-articular (IA) (2-fragment) fractures, and ORIF of IA (> 3 fragments) fractures. The reimbursement ratio was defined and calculated as the ratio of charges to payment. Rates were adjusted for inflation using the annual consumer-price index.

Results For these four surgeries from 2012 to 2017, total patient charges grew by 64% from $117 to 193 million, while surgeon payment grew by 42% from $30 to 42 million. CRPP cases fell by 47%, while ORIF increased by 17, 14, and 45% for extra-articular, IA (2-fragment), and IA (> 3 fragments) surgeries, respectively. After adjusting for inflation, payment to physicians increased by more than or equal to 16% for all procedures except for CRPP, which fell by 2%. Charges during this same period increased from 13 to 38%. Reimbursement ratios declined from −9.2% to −13% for each procedure.

Conclusion From 2012 to 2017, while charges have outpaced surgeon payment, payment has outpaced inflation for all forms of distal radius ORIF, aside from CRPP. There has been a continued sharp decline of CRPP. Level of Evidence is III, economic.

Keywords

distal radius fracture - surgeon payment - patient charges - volar plates - closed reduction percutaneous fixation

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Our institution operates under multiple Federal-Wide Assurances:

FWA00005752 and FWA00006087; IRB and ethic committee reference numbers: IRB00033905 / CR00020681

Publication History

Article published online:
01 June 2022

• References

• 1 Eltorai AEM, Durand WM, Haglin JM, Rubin LE, Weiss AC, Daniels AH. Trends in Medicare reimbursement for orthopedic procedures: 2000 to 2016. Orthopedics 2018; 41 (02) 95-102
• 2 Malik AT, Kopechek KJ, Bishop JY, Cvetanovich GL, Khan SN, Neviaser AS. Declining trends in Medicare physician reimbursements for shoulder surgery from 2002 to 2018. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29 (12) e451-e461
• 3 Nayar SK, Wollstein A, Sullivan BT. et al. Are we working harder for less pay? A survey of Medicare reimbursement for hand and upper extremity surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022
• 4 Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (08) 1868-1873
• 5 Rupp M, Cambon-Binder A, Alt V, Feron JM. Is percutaneous pinning an outdated technique for distal radius fractures?. Injury 2019; 50 (Suppl. 01) S30-S35
• 6 Chaudhry H, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Mundi R, Ristevski B, Goslings JC, Bhandari M. Are volar locking plates superior to percutaneous K-wires for distal radius fractures? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (09) 3017-3027
• 7 Chung KC, Kim HM, Malay S, Shauver MJ. WRIST Group. Comparison of 24-month outcomes after treatment for distal radius fracture: the WRIST randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (06) e2112710 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12710.
• 8 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. “Physician and other Supplier data CY 2012-2017.” CMS. www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Physician-and-Other-Supplier2012-2017 Accessed March 23, 2022
• 9 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “CPI inflation calculator.” U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics. www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm Accessed March 23, 2022
• 10 Marrache M, Harris AB, Puvanesarajah V. et al. Hospital payments increase as payments to surgeons decrease for common inpatient orthopaedic procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2020; 4 (04) e20
• 11 Nandyala SV, Giladi AM, Parker AM, Rozental TD. Comparison of direct perioperative costs in treatment of unstable distal radial fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (09) 786-792
• 12 Rozental TD, Blazar PE, Franko OI, Chacko AT, Earp BE, Day CS. Functional outcomes for unstable distal radial fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation or closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (08) 1837-1846
• 13 Rajan PV, Qudsi RA, Dyer GSM, Losina E. The cost-effectiveness of surgical fixation of distal radial fractures: a computer model-based evaluation of three operative modalities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (03) e13 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00181.
• 14 Bhat SB, Liss FE, Beredjiklian PK. Economic analysis of the cost of implants used for treatment of distal radius fractures. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2018; 6 (05) 371-375
• 15 Wasterlain AS, Melamed E, Bello R, Karia R, Capo JT. Science of Variation Group. The effect of price on surgeons' choice of implants: a randomized controlled survey. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (08) 593-601.e6
• 16 Agarwal R, Liao JM, Gupta A, Navathe AS. The impact of bundled payment on health care spending, utilization, and quality: a systematic review. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39 (01) 50-57
• 17 Siddiqi A, White PB, Mistry JB. et al. Effect of bundled payments and health care reform as alternative payment models in total joint arthroplasty: a clinical review. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (08) 2590-2597
• 18 Barnett ML, Wilcock A, McWilliams JM. et al. Two-year evaluation of mandatory bundled payments for joint replacement. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (03) 252-262
• 19 Odum SM, Hamid N, Van Doren BA, Spector LR. Is there value in retrospective 90-day bundle payment models for shoulder arthroplasty procedures?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27 (05) e149-e154
• 20 Walters JD, Walsh RN, Smith RA, Brolin TJ, Azar FM, Throckmorton TW. Bundled payment plans are associated with notable cost savings for ambulatory outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28 (19) 795-801
• 21 Huetteman HE, Zhong L, Chung KC. Cost of surgical treatment for distal radius fractures and the implications of episode-based bundled payments. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (08) 720-730
• 22 Clemens J, Gottlieb JD. In the shadow of a giant: Medicare's influence on private physician payments. J Polit Econ 2017; 125 (01) 1-39
• 23 Greenwald AS, Bassano A, Wiggins S, Froimson MI. Alternative reimbursement models: bundled payment and beyond: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (11) e45 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01174.