Habilitation and Management of Auditory Processing Disorders: Overview of Selected Procedures

Abstract

This article describes three management approaches that can be used with children with auditory processing difficulties and learning disabilities. These approaches were selected because they can be applied in a variety of settings by a variety of professionals, as well as interested parents. The vocabulary building procedure is one that potentially can increase the ability to learn new words but also can provide training on contextual derivation of information, which is key to auditory closure processes. This procedure also helps increase language base, which can also enhance closure abilities. Auditory memory enhancement is a simple technique that involves many complex brain processes. This procedure reduces detailed information to a more gestalt representation and also integrates the motor and spatial processes of the brain. This, in turn, more fully uses working memory and helps in formulization and recall of important concepts of the sensory input. Finally, several informal auditory training techniques are discussed that can be readily employed in the school or home setting. These auditory training techniques are those that are most relevant to the kinds of deficits most often observed in our clinic.

Abbreviations: ΑΜΕ = auditory memory enhancement, AT = auditory training, CAPD = central auditory processing disorder, CV = consonant-vowel, CVC = consonant-vowel-consonant

Key Words

Auditory rehabilitation - auditory training - central auditory processing disorder

Publication History

Article published online:
29 April 2022

• REFERENCES

• Ashcraft ΜΗ. (1989). Human Memory and Cognition. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
• Bornstein SP, Musiek FE. (1984). Implications of temporal processing for children with learning and language problems. In Beasley D, ed. Contemporary Issues in Audition. San Diego: College-Hill Press, 25–65.
• Bower GH. (1972). A selective review of organizational factors in memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W, eds. Organization of Memory. New York: Academic Press.
• Chermak GD, Musiek FE. (1992). Managing central auditory processing in children and youth. Am J Audiol 1:61–65.
• Chermak GD, Musiek FE. (1997). Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular.
• Cole R, Jakimik J. (1980). Amodel of speech perception. In: Cole R, ed. Perception and Production of Fluent Speech. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum, 133–160.
• Handel S. (1989). Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Hergenhahn BR, Olson MH. (1993). An Introduction to Theories of Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Hetu R, Gagnon-Ttuchon C, Bilideau S. (1990). Problems of noise in school settings: a review of literature and the results of an exploratory study. J Speech Pathol Audiol 14:31–39.
• Kinsbourne M, Caplan PJ. (1979). Children's Learning and Attention Problems. Boston: Little, Brown.
• Maclnnis D, Price L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: review and extensions. J Consumer Res 13:473–491.
• Massaro DW. (1987). Speech Perception by Ear and Eye. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL, Tallal P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 271:77–80.
• Miller A. (1987). Cognitive styles: an integrated model. Educ Psychol 7:251–268.
• Miller GA. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity to for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81—97.
• Miller GA, Gildea PM. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American 257:94–99.
• Musiek FE, Berge B. (1998). A neuroscience view of auditory training/stimulation and central auditory processing disorders. In: Masters M, Stecker Ν, Katz J, eds. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Mostly Management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 15–32.
• Musiek FE, Chermak GD. (1995). Three commonly asked questions about central auditory processing disorders: management. Am J Audiol 4:15–18.
• Musiek FE, Schochat E. (1998). Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders: a case study. Semin Hear 19:357–366.
• Perfetti CA. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Pinheiro M, Musiek F. (1985). Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
• Posner M, Hanson V. (1980). Analyzing spoken and written language. In: Cole R, ed. Perception and Production of Fluent Speech. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum, 210–214.
• Price C. (1997). Functional anatomy of reading. In: Frackowiak R, Fristen C, Frith C, Dolan R, Maziotta J, eds. Human Brain Function. New York: Academic Press, 301–328.
• Sanders DA. (1971). Aural Rehabilitation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Schacter DL, Tulving E. (1994). Memory Systems Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Schow R, Nerbonne M. (1996). Introduction toAudiologic Rehabilitation. 3rd Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Sloan C. (1986). Treating Auditory Processing Difficulties in Children. San Diego: College-Hill.
• Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, WangX, Nagarajan SS. Schriener C, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 271:81–84.
• Thompson M, Abel S. (1992). Indices of hearing in patients with central auditory pathology. II: choice response time. ScandAudiol 21:17–22.
• Tulving E, Donaldson W. (1972). Organization of Memory. New York: Academic.
• Valett RE. (1983). Developing linguistic auditory memory patterns. J Learn Disabil 16:462–466.
• Wittrock MC. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educ Psychol 11:87–95.
• Wittrock MC. (1977). The Human Brain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.