Hearing Aid Outcome Measures for Children

Abstract

The provision of appropriate amplification for a young hearing-impaired child is critical as the aided speech signal will be used for the development of speech and language. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the complex issues surrounding the documentation of hearing aid outcomes in the pediatric population. In the first two sections of the paper, the unique characteristics and needs of the pediatric population and factors complicating the measurement of outcome are described in detail. The third section provides a review of literature on existing outcome measures for children and the fourth section is devoted to a discussion of alternative approaches. The final section is an overview of clinical and research needs in the area of hearing aid outcome measures for children.

Abbreviations: AAI = Aided Audibility Index; ABR = auditory brainstem response; Al = Articulation Index; APHAB = Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit; CL = compression limiting; COSI = Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement; DSL = Desired Sensation Level; HPIC = Hearing Performance Inventory for Children; LDL = loudness discomfort level; LIFE = Listening Instrument for Education; PC = peak clipping; SIFTER = Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk; WDRC = wide dynamic range compression

Key Words

Children - hearing aid - hearing loss - outcome

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. April 2022

• REFERENCES

• American National Standards Institute. (1969). Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index. (ANSI S3.5–1969.) New York: Acoustical Society of America.
• Anderson K. (1989). Screening Instrument for Targeting Education Risk (SIFTER). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
• Anderson K, Matkin N. (1996). Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk in Preschool Children (Age 3–Kindergarten) (Preschool S.I.F.T.E.R.). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association.
• Berger KW, Hagberg EN. (1982). Hearing aid users attitudes and hearing aid usage. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology 3.
• Boothroyd A. (1991). Speech perception measures and their role in the evaluation of hearing aid performance. In: Feigin J, Stelmachowicz P, eds. Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference of Pediatric Amplification. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, 1991, 77–91.
• Boothroyd A, Eran O, Hanin L. (1996). Speech perception and production in children with hearing impairment. In: Bess FH, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM, eds. Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 55–74.
• Byrne D, Ching T. (1997). Optimising amplification for hearing-impaired children: I. Issues and procedures. Aust J Educ Deaf 3:21–28.
• Byrne D, Dillon H. (1986). The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 7:257–265.
• Ching T, Newall P, Wigney D. (1994). Audio-visual and auditory paired comparison judgments by severely and profoundly hearing impaired children: reliability and frequency response preferences. Aust J Audiol 16:99–106.
• Ching T, Newall P, Wigney D. (1996). Frequency response and gain requirements of severely and profoundly hearing impaired children. Aust J Audiol 18:99–101.
• Christensen LA, Thomas TE. (1997). The Use of Multiple-Memory Hearing-Aid Technology in Children. Presented at the 2nd Biennial Hearing Aid Research and Development Conference, September 1997, Bethesda, MD.
• Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. (1995). The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 97:1854–1864.
• Cox RM. (1981). Using LDLs to establish hearing aid limiting levels. Hear Instr 32:16–20.
• Cox RM, Alexander GC. (1995). The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear 16:176–186.
• Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 8:27–43.
• Dillon H, Koritschoner E, Battaglia J, Lovegrove R, Ginis J, Mavrias G, Carnie L, Ray P, Forsythe L, Towers E, Goulias H, Macaskil F. (1991). Rehabilitation effectiveness I: assessing the needs of clients of a national hearing rehabilitation program. Aust J Audiol 13:55–65.
• Eisenberg LS, Levitt Η. (1991). Paired comparison judgments for hearing aid selection in children. Ear Hear 12:417–430.
• Feigin JA, Kopun JG, Stelmachowicz PG, Gorga MP. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear Hear 10:254–258.
• Gatehouse S. (1992). The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 92:1258–1268.
• Gatehouse S. (1993). Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 4:296–306.
• Gravel J, Fausel N, Liskow C, Chobot J. (in press). Children's speech recognition in noise using dual microphone hearing aid technology. Ear Hear.
• Haggard MP, Foster JR, Iredale FE. (1981). Use and benefit of postaural aids in sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 10:45–52.
• Hawkins DB, Walden BE, Montgomery A, Prosek RA. (1987). Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear 8:162–169.
• Hawkins DB, Yacullo WS. (1984). Signal-to-noise advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 49:278–286.
• Hou Ζ, Thornton AR. (1994). A model to evaluate and maximize hearing aid performance by integrating the articulation index across listening conditions. Ear Hear 15:105–112.
• Humes LE. (1991). Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. J Am Acad Audiol 2:59–69.
• Humes LE, Dirks DD, Bell TS, Kincaid GE. (1987). Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. J Acoust Soc Am 81:765–773.
• Jordt J, Ching T, Byrne D, Birtles G, Dillon H, Flora RD, Hill M, Battaglia J, Kirievsky L. (1997). Optimising amplification for hearing impaired children: II. Aided speech audiogram. Aust J Educ Deaf 3:29–33.
• Katz DR, Elliott LL. (1978). Development of a New Children's Speech Discrimination Test. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, November 1978, Chicago, IL.
• Kawell M, Kopun J, Stelmachowicz PG. (1988). Loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear 9:133–136.
• Kessler AR, Giolas TG, Maxon AB. (1990). The Hearing Performance Inventory for Children (HPIC): Reliability and Validity. Poster presented at American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, November 1990, Seattle, WA.
• Kopun JG, Stelmachowicz PG. (in press). The perceived communication difficulties of children with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol.
• Kruger B. (1987). An update on the external ear resonance in infants and young children. Ear Hear 8:333–336.
• Kruger B, Ruben AJ. (1987). The acoustic properties of the infant ear. A preliminary report. Acta Otolaryngol 103:578–585.
• Kuhl PK (1983). The perception of speech in early infancy: four phenomena. In: Gerger S, Mencher G, eds. The Development of Auditory Behavior. New York: Grune and Stratton, 187–218.
• Macpherson BJ, Elfenbein JL, Schum RL, Bentler RA. (1991). Thresholds of discomfort in young children. Ear Hear 12:184–190.
• Macrae J. (1982). The validity of aided thresholds. Aust J Audiol 4:48–54.
• Macrae J, Frazier G. (1980). An investigation of variables affecting aided thresholds. Aust J Audiol 2:56–62.
• Moeller MP. (1993). Auditory Learning: Efficacy and Evaluation. Presented at Developments in Pediatric Audiology: Assessment and Amplification, September 1993, Omaha, NE.
• Moeller MP. (1998). Early intervention of hearing loss in children. In: Bess FH, ed. Fourth International Symposium on Childhood Deafness. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 305–310.
• Moodie KS, Seewald RC, Sinclair ST. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. Am J Audiol 3:23–31.
• Morrongiello BA, Robson RC, Best CT, Clifton RK. (1984). Trading relations in the perception of speech by 5–year-old children. J Exp Child Psychol 37:231–250.
• Mueller HG, Killion MC. (1990). An easy method for calculating the articulation index. Hear J 43:14–17.
• Nelson Barlow NL, Auslander MC, Rines D, Stelmacho-wicz PG. (1988). Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults. Ear Hear 9:243–247.
• Nittrouer S. (1992). Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions with syllables and across syllable boundaries. J Phon 20:1–32.
• Nittrouer S, Boothroyd A. (1990). Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2705–2715.
• Nittrouer S, Studdert-Kennedy M. (1987). The role of coarticulatory effects on the perception of fricatives by children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 30:319–329.
• Nozza RJ, Rossman RNF, Bond LC. (1991). Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Audiology 30:102–112.
• Oja GL, Schow RL. (1984). Hearing aid evaluation based on measures of benefit, use, and satisfaction. Ear Hear 5:77–86.
• Pavlovic CV. (1984). Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 75:1253–1258.
• Pediatric Working Group. (1996). Amplification for infants and children with hearing loss. Am J Audiol 5:53–68.
• Robbins AM, Renshaw J, Berry S. (1991). Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 12 (Suppl): 144–150.
• Ross M, Lerman J. (1970). A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 13:44–53.
• Ross M, Levitt H. (1997). Consumer satisfaction is not enough: hearing aids are still about hearing. Semin Hear 18:7–11.
• Seewald RC. (1992). The Desired Sensation Level method for fitting children: version 3.0. Hear J 45:36–41.
• Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Jenstad L, Moodie S, Shantz J, Pumford J. (1997). Rationale for WDRC Applications in Pediatric Fittings. Presented at Developments in Pediatric Audiology: Current Issues in Assessment and Management, October 1997, Omaha, NE.
• Seewald RC, Moodie KS, Sinclair ST, Cornelisse LE. (1996). Traditional and theoretical approaches to selecting amplification for infants and young children. In: Bess FH, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM, eds. Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 161–191.
• Smaldino J, Anderson Κ (1997). Development of the Listening Inventory for Education. Presented at the Second Biennial Hearing Aid Research and Development Conference, September 1997, Bethesda, MD.
• Snik AF, Hombergen GC. (1993). Hearing aid fitting of preschool and primary school children. An evaluation using the insertion gain measurement. Scand Audiol 22:245–250.
• Snik AF, Stollman ΜΗ. (1995). Measured and calculated insertion gains in young children. Br J Audiol 29:7–11.
• Snik AF, van den Borne S, Brokx JP, Hoekstra C. (1995). Hearing aid fitting in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Comparison of prescription rules. Scand Audiol 24:225–230.
• Stapells DR, Gravel JS, Martin BA. (1995). Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 16:361–371.
• Stelmachowicz PG. (1991). Current issues in pediatric amplification. In: Feigin J, Stelmachowicz PG, eds. Pediatric Amplification: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference. Omaha, NE: Boys Town National Research Hospital, 1–17.
• Stelmachowicz PG, Kalberer A, Lewis DE. (1996). Situational hearing aid response profile (SHARP). In: Bess FH, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM, eds. Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 193–213.
• Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE. (1988). Some theoretical considerations concerning the relation between functional gain and insertion gain. J Speech Hear Res 31:491–496.
• Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE, Hoover B, Keefe D. (in press). Objective and subjective effects of peak clipping vs. compression limiting in normal and hearing-impaired children. J Acoust Soc Am.
• Stelmachowicz PG, Mace AL, Kopun JG, Carney E. (1993). Long-term and short-term characteristics of speech: implications for hearing aid selection for young children. J Speech Hear Res 36:609–620.
• Stuart A, Durieux-Smith A, Stenstrom R. (1991). Probe tube microphone measures of loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear 12:140–143.
• Teghtsoonian M. (1980). Children's scales of length and loudness: a developmental application of cross-modal matching. J Exp Child Psychol 30:290–307.
• Valente Μ, Fabry DA, Potts LG. (1995). Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 6:440–449.
• Weinstein BE. (1997). Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process. Trends in Amplification 2:117–137.
• Yoshinago-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. (in press). The impact of newborn hearing screening on language development. Pediatrics.
• Zurek PM, Delhorne LA. (1987). Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. J AcoustAm 82:1548–1559.