Download PDF
J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11(04): 181-189
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748044
Original Article

Performance of Dual-Microphone In-the-Ear Hearing Aids

Michael Valente
Division of Adult Audiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Gerald Schuchman
Audiology and Speech Pathology, VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
,
Lisa G. Potts
Division of Adult Audiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Lucille B. Beck
Audiology and Speech Pathology, VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Fifty subjects with mild to moderate-severe sensorineural hearing loss and prior experience with binaural amplification were evaluated at two sites (25 subjects at each site). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) after each subject wore binaural in-the-ear hearing aids programmed for omnidirectional and dual-microphone performance, for 4 weeks. Both microphone conditions were evaluated under "ideal" (signal at 0°; noise at 180°) and "diffuse" (signal at 0°; correlated noise at 45°, 135°, 225°, and 315°) listening conditions. Results revealed statistically significant mean improvements in SNRs between 3.7 and 3.5 dB at Site I and 3.2 and 2.7 dB at Site II for the ideal and diffuse listening conditions, respectively, for the dual-microphones in comparison to the performance provided by the omnidirectional microphone.

Abbreviations: Dl = directivity index, HINT = Hearing in Noise Test, NAL-R = National Acoustic Laboratory-Revised, REIG = real-ear insertion gain, SAV = select-a-vent, SC+aRT = super compression with adaptive release time

Key Words

Diffuse - dual-microphone - HINT thresholds - ideal - omnidirectional - signal-to-noise ratio - super compression with adaptive release time


Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2022

© 2000. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • Agnew J. (1996). Directionality in hearing. . .revisited. Hear Rev 3(8):20, 22, 24–25.
  • Agnew J, Block M. (1997). HINT thresholds for a dual-microphone BTE. Hear Rev 4(9):26, 29–30.
  • American National Standards Institute. (1989). American National Standard for Specification of Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1989). New York: ANSI.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1978). Manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 4:297–301.
  • Beck LB. (1991). Where do we go from here? In: Studebaker GA, Bess FH, Beck LB, eds. The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II. Parkton, MD: York Press, 1–12.
  • Byrne D, Dillon H. (1986). The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAD new procedure for selecting gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 7:257–265.
  • Gravel JS, Fausel N, Liskow C, Chobot J. (1999). Children's speech recognition in noise using omnidirectional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Ear Hear 20:1–11.
  • Hawkins DB, Yacullo WS. (1984). Signal-to-noise advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord 49:278–286.
  • Kirk RE. (1982). Experimental Design. 2nd Ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Kirkwood D. (1997). After record 1996 sales, industry leaders see more growth ahead. Hear J 50(l):21-30.
  • Kochkin S. (1996). Customer satisfaction and subjective benefit with high performance hearing aids. Hear Rev 3(12):16-26.
  • Lentz WE. (1972). Speech discrimination in the presence of background noise using a hearing aid with a direc-tionally sensitive microphone. Maico Audiol Lib Series 10(9).
  • Lurquin P, Rafhay S. (1996). Intelligibility of noise using multi-microphone hearing aids. Acia Otorhinolaryngol Belg 50:103-109.
  • Madison TK, Hawkins DB. (1983). The signal-to-noise ratio advantage of directional microphones. Hear lustrum 34(2):18,49.
  • Mueller G, Wesselkamp M. (1999). Ten commonly asked questions about directional microphone fittings. Hear Rev 3(l):26-30.
  • Preves DA, Sammeth SA, Wynne MK. (1999). Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. J Am Acad Audiol 10:273-284.
  • Pumford JM, Seewald RC, Scollie S, Jenstad LM. (2000). Speech recognition in diffuse noise using in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. J Am Acad Audiol 11:23-35.
  • Ricketts T, Dhar S. (1999). Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 10:180-189.
  • Roberts M, Schulein R. (1997). Measurement and Intelligibility Optimization of Directional Microphones for Use in Hearing Aid Devices. Paper presented at the 103rd meeting of Audio Engineering Society; New York, NY.
  • Soli SD, Nilsson MJ. (1994). Assessment of communication handicap with the HINT. Hear Instr 45(2):12-16.
  • Studebaker GA, Cox RM, Formby C. (1980). The effect of environment on the directional performance of head worn hearing aids. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I, eds. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Baltimore: University Park Press, 81-105.
  • Sung SG, Sung RJ, Angelli A. (1975). Directional microphone in hearing aids: effects on speech discrimination in noise. Arch Otolaryngol 101:316—319.
  • Turner CW, Humes LE, Bentier RA, Cox RM. (1996). A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time. Ear Hear 17:14S-28S.
  • Valente Μ, Fabry DA, Potts LG. (1995). Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol 6:440-449.
  • Wolf R. (1999). Directional microphone hearing instruments: how and why they work. Hear Rev 3(1):14–25.