CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2022; 12(04): 441-447
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743550
Original Article

Experience Delivering Tele-practice Services among Upcoming and Working Professionals of Speech Language Pathology

Biraj Bhattarai
1   All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
,
1   All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
,
Abhishek Buddiguppe Panchakshari
2   Department of Speech Language Science, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India
3   Nitte Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Finding None.

Abstract

Introduction Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic, tele-practice has become the new normal in the field of Speech-Language Pathology. Students and professionals throughout the country are embracing this new normal. Both groups confront problems; documentation of the problems may provide insight into how to improve tele-practice services.

Aim The purpose of this study was to compare the problems that undergraduate students, postgraduate students, and working professionals in the field of Speech-Language Pathology experience in daily practice.

Methods A descriptive cross-sectional survey study using a web-based questionnaire was conducted to examine the obstacles experienced by students and working professionals in the field of speech-language pathology, as well as their perspectives about tele-practice. There was a total of 20 questions. Divided into four sections, closed questions and Likert scale questions were used for demographic details, practice aspects, experience during telerehabilitation, and evaluation and treatment.

Results The study had 118 participants (47% postgraduate students, 29% undergraduate students, and 24% professionals). Only 16% of clinicians were properly trained to provide services via tele-mode. All participants reported providing service to the pediatric population to be challenging, with autism spectrum disorder, fluency disorders, and hearing impairment to be difficult to handle cases. In tele-mode, undergraduate students reported a decrease in the number of cases and difficulties selecting therapy materials when compared with the other two groups. All three groups reported a lack of evidence-based teletherapy resources available. There was no difference in perceived difficulty between the three groups while conducting assessment and achieving treatment goals via tele-mode.

Conclusion Tele-practice is generally recognized and employed, according to data availability. In terms of resource selection, evaluation, and treatment sessions, the difficulties faced by students and experts are disturbing. In the realm of speech-language pathology, strategies to address these issues could pave the way for tele-practice. As a result, better policies are strongly advised to address these difficulties to improve future tele-mode service quality.

Ethical Standards

The manuscript adheres to the ethical standards according to the Declaration of Helsinki.


Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical guidelines of bio-behavioral research involving human subjects of the All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore.


Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient to participate in the study.




Publication History

Article published online:
24 March 2022

© 2022. Nitte (Deemed to be University). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 WHO. Mental Health and Psychosocial Considerations during COVID-19 Outbreak. World Health Organization; 2020
  • 2 Bhatarai P, Bhattarai B, Karna SL. Audiology and speech-language pathology services in pediatric population during COVID pandemic in Nepal. Nepal Med J 2020; 3 (02) 398-401
  • 3 ASHA. Telepractice Services and Coronavirus/COVID-19. American Speech-Language and Hearing Association.. Published 2020. Accessed July 26, 2021 at: https://www.asha.org/practice/telepractice-services-and-coronavirus/
  • 4 Yashaswini R. Telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology: prospects and challenges. J Indian Speech Lang Hear Assoc 2018; 32 (02) 67
  • 5 Chaudhary T, Kanodia A, Verma H, Singh CA, Mishra AK, Sikka K. A pilot study comparing teletherapy with the conventional face-to-face therapy for speech-language disorders. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 73 (03) 366-370
  • 6 Grillo EU. Results of a survey offering clinical insights into speech-language pathology telepractice methods. Int J Telerehabilitation 2017; 9 (02) 25-30
  • 7 Macoir J, Sauvageau VM, Boissy P, Tousignant M, Tousignant M. In-home synchronous telespeech therapy to improve functional communication in chronic poststroke aphasia: results from a quasi-experimental study. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23 (08) 630-639
  • 8 Mohan HS, Anjum A, Rao PKS. A survey of telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology in India. Int J Telerehabil 2017; 9 (02) 69-80
  • 9 Vrinda R, Reni PS. Telerehabilitation in the field of speech-language pathology during pandemic COVID19 outbreak-an analysis in Kerala. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 2020;13(04):
  • 10 Tohidast SA, Mansuri B, Bagheri R, Azimi H. Provision of speech-language pathology services for the treatment of speech and language disorders in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Problems, concerns, and solutions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 138: 110262
  • 11 Yashaswini R. Tele speech-language pathology and audiology in India—a short report. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth 2018; 6: e19
  • 12 Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Gibson K. et al. Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9 (01) 201
  • 13 Kumar SG, Roy G, Kar SS. Disability and rehabilitation services in India: issues and challenges. J Family Med Prim Care 2012; 1 (01) 69-73
  • 14 ISHA. . Welcome to ISHA. 2017
  • 15 Aggarwal K, Patel R, Ravi R. Uptake of telepractice among speech-language therapists following COVID-19 pandemic in India. Speech Lang Hear 2021; 24 (04) 228-234
  • 16 Grogan-Johnson S, Meehan R, Mccormick K, Miller N. Results of a National Survey of Preservice Telepractice Training in Graduate Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Programs. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 2015; 42: 122-137
  • 17 Telerehabilitation in the field of speech-language pathology during pandemic covid19 outbreak-an analysis in Kerala. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 2020; 13 (04) 2281-2288
  • 18 Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29 (05) 489-497
  • 19 Yoo J, Yoon MS, Lee CK, Hong GH, Choi SJ. An exploratory survey of priorities in establishing telepractice system for SLPs and caregivers in Korea. Commun Disord Q 2020
  • 20 (PDF) PREVALENCE OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS IN A RURAL POPULATION OF INDIA. . Accessed July 21, 2021 at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340454580_PREVALENCE_OF_COMMUNICATION_DISORDERS_IN_A_RURAL_POPULATION_OF_INDIA
  • 21 van Daal J, Verhoeven L, van Balkom H. Behaviour problems in children with language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48 (11) 1139-1147
  • 22 Overby MS. Stakeholders' qualitative perspectives of effective telepractice pedagogy in speech-language pathology. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2018; 53 (01) 101-112
  • 23 Lincoln M, Hines M, Fairweather C, Ramsden R, Martinovich J. Multiple stakeholder perspectives on teletherapy delivery of speech pathology services in rural schools: a preliminary, qualitative investigation. Int J Telerehabil 2014; 6 (02) 65-74