CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2022; 12(04): 361-368
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743530
Review Article

Is Non-Restorative Cavity Treatment a Practical Choice in Primary Teeth?

Amarshree A. Shetty
1   Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Aditi Acharya
1   Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Manju R.
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

For years, “extension for prevention” was considered as the standard protocol for the restoration of caries. With advances in the field of cariology regarding the biofilm and improvement in materials, this perspective is being challenged. This is being challenged by more biological and less-invasive approaches, where the emphasis is on biofilm alteration to arrest carious lesions. This minimally invasive intervention is based on the concept that biofilm overlying the carious lesion is a driving force for the carious process and not the bacteria present in the infected dentin. Hence, daily removal or disruption of this biofilm will slow down the carious process or bring it to halt.

One such approach is non-restorative cavity treatment, where no caries is removed but lesions are made self-cleansable that allows it to be brushed by the parent or the child. This wholesome approach targets the disease at a causal level.

This review of literature describes the various advantages and limitations of this technique and the practicability of its use in pediatric patients during the pandemic COVID-19.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 March 2022

© 2022. Nitte (Deemed to be University). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • Reference

  • 1 Black GV. A Work on Operative Dentistry. Chicago: Medico-Dental Publishing; 1908
  • 2 Schwendicke F, Meyer-Lueckel H, Dörfer C, Paris S. Failure of incompletely excavated teeth--a systematic review. J Dent 2013; 41 (07) 569-580
  • 3 Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (03) CD003808
  • 4 van Strijp G, van Loveren C. No removal and inactivation of carious tissue: non-restorative cavity control. Monogr Oral Sci 2018; 27: 124-136
  • 5 Ricketts DNJ, Pitts NB. Traditional operative treatment options. Monogr Oral Sci 2009; 21: 164-173
  • 6 Kandiah T, Johnson J, Fayle SA. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010; 20 (Suppl. 01) 5
  • 7 Black GV. The Pathology of Hard Tissues of the Teeth. Part III. Treatment of Caries in Operative Dentistry.. Vol 1. London: Medico-Dental Publishing; 1936
  • 8 Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 2006; 6 (1, Suppl 1) S14
  • 9 Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn WG, Gooch BF, Caufield PW. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 (03) 271-278 , quiz 357–358. Doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156
  • 10 Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J 2002; 193 (02) 99-103
  • 11 Schwendicke F. Removing carious tissue: why and how?. Monogr Oral Sci 2018; 27: 56-67
  • 12 Kher MSRA. Contemporary Treatment Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry.. Springer; Cham: 2019.
  • 13 Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L. et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Adv Dent Res 2016; 28 (02) 49-57
  • 14 Gruythuysen RJ. Niet-Restauratieve Caviteitsbehandeling. Cariësactiviteit beteugelen in plaats van maskeren. [Non-Restorative Cavity Treatment. Managing rather than masking caries activity] Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2010; 117 (03) 173-180
  • 15 Gruythuysen RJM. Non-restorative cavity treatment: should this be the treatment of choice? reflections of a teacher in paediatric dentistry. Dent Update 2019; 46 (03) 220-228
  • 16 Fejerskov O, Nyvad B. Root surface caries-rationale behind good diagnostic practice. Monogr Oral Sci 2017; 26: 43-54
  • 17 Stel G, Veerkamp JSJ, van Amerongen WE, Martens LC, van Gemert-Schriks MCM. Treatment of (deep) caries lesions in primary teeth. In: Kindertandheelkunde Part 2. Houten:Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2013: Chapter 32.
  • 18 Santamaría RM, Innes NPT, Machiulskiene V, Schmoeckel J, Alkilzy M, Splieth CH. Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-year outcomes of a randomised clinical trial. Caries Res 2017; 51 (06) 605-614
  • 19 Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB. et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: a report from the American Dental Association. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149 (10) 837-849.e19
  • 20 Anderson BG. Clinical study of arresting dental caries. J Dent Res 1938; 17 (06) 443-452
  • 21 Lo EC, Schwarz E, Wong MC. Arresting dentine caries in Chinese preschool children. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998; 8 (04) 253-260
  • 22 Schwarz E, Lo EC, Wong MC. Prevention of early childhood caries--results of a fluoride toothpaste demonstration trial on Chinese preschool children after three years. J Public Health Dent 1998; 58 (01) 12-18
  • 23 Peretz B, Gluck G. Early childhood caries (ECC): a preventive-conservative treatment mode during a 12-month period. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2006; 30 (03) 191-194
  • 24 Mijan M, de Amorim RG, Leal SC. et al. The 3.5-year survival rates of primary molars treated according to three treatment protocols: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18 (04) 1061-1069
  • 25 Mijan M, de Amorim RG, Leal SC. et al. Correction to: The 3.5-year survival rates of primary molars treated according to three treatment protocols: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (01) 545
  • 26 Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, Evans DJ, Splieth CH. Caries management strategies for primary molars: 1-yr randomized control trial results. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (11) 1062-1069
  • 27 Criteria Manual: International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II). International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Coordinating Committee. Baltimore, Maryland: 12th-14th March; 2005
  • 28 Llodra JC, Rodriguez A, Ferrer B, Menardia V, Ramos T, Morato M. Efficacy of silver diamine fluoride for caries reduction in primary teeth and first permanent molars of schoolchildren: 36-month clinical trial. J Dent Res 2005; 84 (08) 721-724
  • 29 Fung MHT, Duangthip D, Wong MCM, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Randomized clinical trial of 12% and 38% silver diamine fluoride treatment. J Dent Res 2018; 97 (02) 171-178
  • 30 Mei ML, Lo EC, Chu CH. Clinical use of silver diamine fluoride in dental treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016; 37 (02) 93-98 , z100
  • 31 Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, Lo EC, Chu CH. Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2016; 16: 12
  • 32 Mejàre I, Stenlund H, Julihn A, Larsson I, Permert L. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age. Caries Res 2001; 35 (03) 178-185
  • 33 Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Mattos MC, Lauris JR, Ericson D, Navarro MF. Comparison of two minimally invasive methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: short-term results of a pilot study. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16 (02) 155-160
  • 34 Peng JJ, Botelho MG, Matinlinna JP. Silver compounds used in dentistry for caries management: a review. J Dent 2012; 40 (07) 531-541
  • 35 Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani, Zilm PS, Gully NJ. An in vitro model to measure the effect of a silver fluoride and potassium iodide treatment on the permeability of demineralized dentine to Streptococcus mutans. Aust Dent J 2005; 50 (04) 242-245
  • 36 Eden E, Frencken J, Gao S, Horst JA, Innes N. Managing dental caries against the backdrop of COVID-19: approaches to reduce aerosol generation. Br Dent J 2020; 229 (07) 411-416
  • 37 Snyder MR, Ravi SJ. 1818, 1918, 2018: two centuries of pandemics. Health Secur 2018; 16 (06) 410-415
  • 38 Su L, Ma X, Yu H. et al. The different clinical characteristics of corona virus disease cases between children and their families in China-the character of children with COVID-19. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9 (01) 707-713
  • 39 Shen Q, Guo W, Guo T. et al. Novel coronavirus infection in children outside of Wuhan, China. Pediatr Pulmonol 2020; 55 (06) 1424-1429
  • 40 Cruz AT, Zeichner SL. COVID-19 in children: initial characterization of the pediatric disease. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (06) e20200834
  • 41 Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Coronavirus infections in children including COVID-19: an overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2020; 39 (05) 355-368
  • 42 Royal college of surgeons England. 2020 Recommendations for paediatric dentistry during COVID-19 pandemic. Accessed February 10, 2022 at: https://www.rcsen g.ac.uk/-/media/fles/rcs/fds/guidelines/paediatric-dentistry-covid19.pdf
  • 43 ADA Interim Guidance for Minimizing Risk of COVID-19 Transmission. Visit ADA.org/InterimGuidance to View the Three Flowcharts Detailing Processes to Minimize COVID-19 Transmission When Treating Dental Emergencies. Accessed February 10, 2022 at: https://snlg.iss.it/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/ADA_COVID_Int_Guidance_Treat_Pts.pdf
  • 44 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 . Interim guidance for businesses and employers to plan and respond to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  • 45 SDCEP COVID-19 guidance update. BDJ Team 2020; 7 (04) 4
  • 46 Australian Dental Association. ADA dental service restriction in COVID-19. 2020
  • 47 New Zealand Ministry of Health. 2020 . Guidelines for oral health services at COVID-19 Alert Level 4. New Zealand dental association. Accessed February 10, 2022 at: https://www.nzda.org.nz/covid-19/protecting-your-health
  • 48 Al-Halabi M, Salami A, Alnuaimi E, Kowash M, Hussein I. Assessment of paediatric dental guidelines and caries management alternatives in the post COVID-19 period. A critical review and clinical recommendations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2020; 21 (05) 543-556
  • 49 RCSENG. 2018 Number of children aged 5 to 9 admitted to hospital due to tooth decay rises again. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Accessed February 10, 2022 at: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news-and-events/media-centre/press-releases/hospital-admission-tooth-decay/
  • 50 Toumba KJ, Twetman S, Splieth C, Parnell C, van Loveren C, Lygidakis NA. Guidelines on the use of fluoride for caries prevention in children: an updated EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2019; 20 (06) 507-516
  • 51 Kühnisch J, Ekstrand KR, Pretty I. et al. Best clinical practice guidance for management of early caries lesions in children and young adults: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2016; 17 (01) 3-12
  • 52 Bezerra DS, Stipp RN, Neves BG, Guedes SF, Nascimento MM, Rodrigues LK. Insights into the virulence traits of Streptococcus mutans in dentine carious lesions of children with early childhood caries. Caries Res 2016; 50 (03) 279-287
  • 53 Gruythuysen RJ, van Loveren C, Wiggelendam JM, van Boven JA, Burgersdijk RC. Neglect of oral care in children: a matter of integral approach (Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015; 159: A8071