Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743288
Early Results of Type I Tympanoplasty in Underprivileged Nepalese Children and Factors Influencing the Surgical Outcomes

Abstract
Introduction Type I Tympanoplasty is a common ear surgery performed in Nepalese children, but no studies have been published about the success rate of the procedure and the factors affecting surgical outcomes.
Objectives To find out the surgical outcome of type I tympanoplasty and to evaluate the factors affecting the success of the surgery in Nepalese children.
Methods This is a retrospective study conducted by analyzing the medical records of a five-year period. Children aged 8–16 years who underwent type I tympanoplasty were included in the study. Surgical pro-forma and records of pre and post-operative pure tone audiometry were documented. Outcome of the surgery was considered a success in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement six months after surgery.
Results Out of 629 children who underwent type I tympanoplasty, anatomical success was observed in 93.32% (n = 587) and functional success in 76% (n = 478). Factors such as age, site and size of the perforation, status of the middle ear and contralateral ear, surgical approach, and the graft used were not the predictors of the surgical outcome.
Conclusions The surgical outcome of type I tympanoplasty in Nepalese children was good. Although surgical outcome was better with older children, post-aural approach, temporalis fascia, inferiorly positioned perforations, and in children with dry middle ear mucosa, none of the parameters considered in this study were found to be a significant predictive factor of the surgical outcome.
Keywords
Pediatric tympanoplasty - Myringoplasty - Predictive factors - Tympanic membrane perforationPublication History
Received: 29 April 2021
Accepted: 22 August 2021
Article published online:
01 August 2022
© 2023. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Reference
- 1 Little P, Bridges A, Guragain R, Friedman D, Prasad R, Weir N. Hearing impairment and ear pathology in Nepal. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107 (05) 395-400
- 2 Berman S. Otitis media in developing countries. Pediatrics 1995; 96 (1 Pt 1): 126-131 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7596700/
- 3 Browning GG, Merchant SN, Kelly G, Swan IR, Carter R, Mc Kerro WS. Chronic otitis Media. In: Gleeson M. ed. Scott-Brown's Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 7 th ed.. London: Edward Arnold; 2008: 3345-3349
- 4 Sismanis A. Tympanoplasty. In: Glasscock–Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear, 5th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2003: 463-485
- 5 Manolidis S. Closure of tympanic membrane perforations. In: Glasscock-Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear, 5th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2003: 400-419
- 6 Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ. Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (05) 530-534
- 7 Kumar S, Acharya A, Hadjihannas E, Panagamuwa C, McDermott AL. Pediatric myringoplasty: definition of “success” and factors affecting outcome. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (09) 1417-1420 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21113985/
- 8 Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M. et al. Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 118 (05) 709-713
- 9 Denoyelle F, Roger G, Chauvin P, Garabedian EN. Myringoplasty in children: predictive factors of outcome. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (01) 47-51
- 10 Al-Khtoum N, Hiari MA. Myringoplasty in children: retrospective analysis of 35 cases. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2009; 75 (03) 371-374
- 11 Ribeiro JC, Rui C, Natercia S, Jose R, Antonio P. Tympanoplasty in children: A review of 91 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 2011; 38 (01) 21-25
- 12 Shrestha S, Sinha BK. Hearing results after myringoplasty. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2006; 4 (04) 455-459 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18603953/
- 13 Joshi RR, Jha AK, Rijal AS, Dhungana A, Shrestha KK. Hearing evaluation after myringoplasty at Nepal medical college and teaching hospital. Journal of Nobel Medical College. 2013; 2 (01) 36-42
- 14 Dangol K, Shrivastav RP. Study of various prognostic factors affecting successful myringoplasty in a tertiary care centre. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 21 (03) 250-254
- 15 Black JH, Hickey SA, Wormald PJ. An analysis of the results of myringoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 31 (01) 95-100
- 16 MacDonald III RR, Lusk RP, Muntz HR. Fasciaform myringoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120 (02) 138-143
- 17 Sckolnick JS, Mantle B, Li J, Chi DH. Pediatric myringoplasty: factors that affect success-a retrospective study. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (04) 723-729
- 18 Uyar Y, Keleş B, Koç S, Oztürk K, Arbağ H. Tympanoplasty in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70 (10) 1805-1809
- 19 Boronat-Echeverría NE, Reyes-García E, Sevilla-Delgado Y, Aguirre-Mariscal H, Mejía-Aranguré JM. Prognostic factors of successful tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2012; 12: 67
- 20 Ryan MA, Kaylie DM. What is the optimal age to repair tympanic membrane perforations in pediatric patients?. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (10) 2201-2202
- 21 Pignataro L, Grillo Della Berta L, Capaccio P, Zaghis A. Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115 (05) 369-373
- 22 Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M, Juantegui M. Myringoplasty: long-term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 1995; 16 (04) 532-535 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8588656/
- 23 Kessler A, Potsic WP, Marsh RR. Type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120 (05) 487-490
- 24 Umapathy N, Dekker PJ. Myringoplasty: is it worth performing in children?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (10) 1053-1055
- 25 Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N. Tympanoplasty type I in children–an evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69 (08) 1071-1076
- 26 Lau T, Tos M. Tympanoplasty in children. An analysis of late results. Am J Otol 1986; 7 (01) 55-59 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3946584/
- 27 Ophir D, Porat M, Marshak G. Myringoplasty in the pediatric population. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113 (12) 1288-1290
- 28 Baklaci D, Guler I, Kuzucu I, Kum RO, Ozcan M. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: a review of 102 cases. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18 (01) 345
- 29 Knapik M, Saliba I. Pediatric myringoplasty: a study of factors affecting outcome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75 (06) 818-823
- 30 Kotecha B, Fowler S, Topham J. Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999; 24 (02) 126-129
- 31 Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP. Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27 (05) 331-334
- 32 Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H. A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 2005; 30 (02) 115-120
- 33 Mak D, MacKendrick A, Bulsara M. et al. Outcomes of myringoplasty in Australian Aboriginal children and factors associated with success: a prospective case series. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004; 29 (06) 606-611
- 34 Bajaj Y, Bais AS, Mukherjee B. Tympanoplasty in children–a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112 (12) 1147-1149
- 35 Tripathi P, Guragain RP, Bhusal CL, Karna SL, Borgstein J. A comparison of two myringoplasty techniques in Nepalese children: a prospective randomized trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79 (09) 1556-1560