Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2023; 07(01): 015-019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742729
Original Article

Value of Office-Based Labs to an Interventional Radiology Practice

Shimwoo Lee 
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Ravi N. Srinivasa
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Prital Patel
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Scott Genshaft
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Dieter R. Enzmann
2   Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding This paper received no financial sources of support, including grants, funding, or other assistance, public or private.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Office-based laboratories (OBLs), or outpatient interventional suites, are rapidly gaining traction with both patients and interventionalists. Compared with hospitals, OBLs can provide greater convenience for patients, allow physicians greater autonomy, and potentially generate more revenue under a lower cost structure. The aim of this article is to discuss logistics and finances of running an OBL using the authors' institution as a guide for interventional radiologists seeking to establish their own OBL.

Materials and Methods Interventional radiology (IR) procedures performed at an OBL from the authors' academic institution were reviewed from January 2017 to December 2020. Yearly revenues and expenses related to IR procedures were recorded.

Results The number and complexity of IR procedures performed in the OBL increased over time with nearly 10-fold growth of revenue from 2017 to 2020.

Conclusion Most IR procedures performed in the hospital are feasible in the OBL setting, and by increasing patient volume and variety over time, an individual OBL can develop into a robust patient care center capable of generating revenue.

Keywords

office-based - laboratory - interventional - radiology


Publication History

Article published online:
25 February 2022

© 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 OEIS. Outpatient Endovascular and Interventional Society. Accessed January 24, 2022 from: https://oeisociety.com
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kho H. Financial considerations for office-based intervention labs. Endovasc Today. 2014; (Jan): 55-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jain KM, Munn J, Rummel M, Vaddineni S, Longton C. Future of vascular surgery is in the office. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (02) 509-513 , discussion 513–514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bundy JJ, Hage AN, Srinivasa RN. et al. Burnout among interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (04) 607-613.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hickey RM, Maslowski JM, Aaltonen ET. et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization in the office-based lab. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (09) 1442-1448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bagla S, Piechowiak R. Prostate artery embolization in an outpatient based lab (OBL): safety and radiation exposure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28: S110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, Meo P, Ahn J, Dolen EG. Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11 (03) 305-311 [Internet]
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 McKeown LA. Endovascular office-based labs: balancing upsides against potential for abuse. TCTMD 2019; (Nov): 1-3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jain K, Munn J, Rummel MC, Johnston D, Longton C. Office-based endovascular suite is safe for most procedures. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59 (01) 186-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar