Consuming Health Information and Vulnerable Populations: Factors of Engagement and Ongoing Usage

Summary

Objectives: To summarise the state of the art during the year 2021 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on “Inclusive Digital Health: Addressing Equity, Literacy, and Bias for Resilient Health Systems”.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries. In order to build queries, we have used a common understanding of digital inclusion. Leaving no one behind in the digital age requires not only reaching the most vulnerable populations, but also those people and population groups that are not digitally literate. It implies appropriate access, digital skills, and usability and navigability aspects in the development of technological solutions. Thus, we identified 126 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 13 were selected for consideration of best paper candidates, which were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. The top five papers were discussed in a consensus meeting. Four papers received the highest score from the expert panel, and these papers were selected to be representative papers on consumer informatics for exploring inclusive digital health in the year 2021.

Results: Bibliometrics analysis conducted on words found in abstracts of the candidate papers revealed five clusters of articles, where the clustering outcomes explained 93.58% of the dispersion. The first cluster analysed the use of mobile apps to improve quality of communications between racial subgroups (e.g., Black patients and their family members) and healthcare professionals, and reduce racial disparities in core palliative care outcomes. The second cluster revealed studies reporting health literacy and experience of patients with specific diseases or impairments (e.g., type 2 diabetes, asthma and deaf people). The third focused assessing the effectiveness of interactive social media interventions on changing health behaviors, health outcomes and health equity in the adult population. The fourth targeted people with limited health literacy, as well as potentially disadvantaged or marginalized groups (people with cerebrovascular or cancer problems, students with mental problems, African American Young adults), and explored how social media may help reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes. The last explored health literacy levels among groups who experience difficulties with health service engagement and retention (patients with cancer or lay consumers of online disease information).

Conclusions: Although the query was built to address consumer inclusiveness and digital health, without specifying any health status or disease, COVID-19 was the topic in a lot of retrieved papers. Beyond the classic health issues targeted by social media (e.g., influencing health behaviors, from smoking and diet adherence to preventative screening and exercise habits), the pandemic has exposed many situations of vulnerability and health inequality. There is universal agreement on the necessity of a healthcare policy that addresses issues of gender, age, sexual orientation, and different cultures to ensure health equity for all, regardless of age or resources available. The place of digital health is studied both as a solution and a possible factor of accentuating healthcare disparities, inequalities, and exclusions. Healthcare providers should implement a digital health literacy plan to make sure health information technology is an option for everyone. Public health policies and health promotion strategies must focus on strengthening and adapting the digital health literacy in known vulnerable subgroups (ethnic and racial minorities, sexual and gender minorities, children and adolescents, elderly people, students population, impaired people, patients with cancer and chronic diseases) increasing citizen technology engagement and guaranteeing equity in access to information and in the skills to manage, discriminate, and apply information to health.

Keywords

Consumer health informatics - health literacy - healthcare disparities - minority groups

Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Consumer Health Informatics

Publication History

Article published online:
04 December 2022

• References

• 1 Shaw J, Chandra S, Gordon D, Bickford J, Fujioka J, Yang R, et al. Digital Health Technologies for More Equitable Health Systems: A Discussion Paper. oronto (ON): University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Women’s College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, 2020. Available from: http:// https://www.wchwihv.ca/assets/uploads/Digital_Health_and_Equity_Report__September_2020FINAL.pdf [cited 2022 June 7]
• 2 Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017;11(4):959-75.
• 3 Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics 1991;22(1):155-205.
• 4 Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 2016; 5(1):1-10.
• 5 Cox CE, Riley IL, Ashana DC, Haines K, Olsen MK, Gu J, et al. Improving racial disparities in unmet palliative care needs among intensive care unit family members with a needs-targeted app intervention: The ICUconnect randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2021 Apr;103:106319.
• 6 Panko TL, Contreras J, Postl D, Mussallem A, Champlin S, Paasche-Orlow MK, et al. The Deaf Community’s Experiences Navigating COVID-19 Pandemic Information. Health Lit Res Pract 2021 Apr;5(2):e162-e170.
• 7 Sjöström A, Hajdarevic S, Hörnsten Å, öberg U, Isaksson U. Experiences of Online COVID-19 Information Acquisition among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes and Varying eHealth Literacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 Dec 15;18(24):13240.
• 8 Salim H, Lee PY, Sharif-Ghazali S, Cheong AT, Wong J, Young I, et al; RESPIRE Collaboration. Developing an Asthma Self-management Intervention Through a Web-Based Design Workshop for People With Limited Health Literacy: User-Centered Design Approach. J Med Internet Res 2021 Sep 9;23(9):e26434.
• 9 Petkovic J, Duench S, Trawin J, Dewidar O, Pardo Pardo J, Simeon R, et al. Behavioural interventions delivered through interactive social media for health behaviour change, health outcomes, and health equity in the adult population. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021 May 31;5(5):CD012932.
• 10 Williamson A, Barbarin A, Campbell B, Campbell T, Franzen S, Reischl TM, et al. Uptake of and Engagement With an Online Sexual Health Intervention (HOPE eIntervention) Among African American Young Adults: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Jul 16;23(7):e22203.
• 11 Noser EA, Zhang J, Rahbar MH, Sharrief AZ, Barreto AD, Shaw S, Grotet al. Leveraging Multimedia Patient Engagement to Address Minority Cerebrovascular Health Needs: Prospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Aug 13;23(8):e28748.
• 12 Valera P, Acuna N, Alzate-Duque L, Liang LE, Cupertino P, Merulla J. The Development and Prototype Feedback of Digital Cancer 101 Videos to Enhance Cancer Education for Marginalized Communities With Limited Health Literacy. Cancer Control 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211006055.
• 13 Withers M, Jahangir T, Kubasova K, Ran MS. Reducing stigma associated with mental health problems among university students in the Asia-Pacific: A video content analysis of student-driven proposals. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2022 Jun;68(4):827-35.
• 14 Moon Z, Zuchowski M, Moss-Morris R, Hunter MS, Norton S, Hughes LD. Disparities in access to mobile devices and e-health literacy among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2022 Jan;30(1):117-26.
• 15 Abdulai AF, Tiffere AH, Adam F, Kabanunye MM. COVID-19 information-related digital literacy among online health consumers in a low-income country. Int J Med Inform 2021 Jan;145:104322.