CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2022; 31(01): 303-306
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742541
Research & Education

Informatics as Science[*]

Edward H. Shortliffe
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
› Institutsangaben


The evolution of the informatics field, now with a well-accepted and crucial role in modern biomedicine and health care delivery, is the result of creative research over seven decades. The success is due in part to recognition that, throughout the process, investigators have documented not only what they have done but what they have learned, stimulating and guiding the next generation of projects. Such iterative experimentation, learning, sharing, and progressing is typical of all scientific disciplines. Yet progress depends on identifying key lessons, insights, and methods so that others can use them. This paper addresses the nature of scientific progress in informatics, recognizing that while the field is motivated by applications that can improve biomedicine and health, the scientific underpinnings must be identified and shared with others if the field is to progress optimally.

* This paper is adapted from a presentation given by the author at the International Medical Informatics Association’s François Grémy Award of Excellence ceremony during Medinfo2021, October 2, 2021 (held virtually).


Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Dezember 2022

© 2022. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Heilbron JL, editor. The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science. 1st edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
  • 2 Lindberg DC. The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
  • 3 Patel VL, Kaufman DR. Science and practice: a case for medical informatics as a local science of design. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998 Nov-Dec;5(6):489-92.
  • 4 Shortliffe EH. The science of biomedical computing (keynote address). In: Pages J, Levy A, Gremy, F, Anderson J, editors. Meeting the Challenge: Informatics and Medical Education [Internet]. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1983 [cited 2022 May 11]. p. 1–10. Available from:
  • 5 Shortliffe EH. Editorial: Inaugural Issue of JBI. J Biomed Inform 2001 Feb 1;34(1):2–3.
  • 6 Journal of Biomedical Informatics (Elsevier) [Internet]. Premier methodology journal in the field.
  • 7 Shortliffe EH. The organization and content of informatics doctoral dissertations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016 Jul;23(4):840-3.
  • 8 AMIA Doctoral Dissertation Award [Internet]. AMIA - American Medical Informatics Association. [cited 2022 May 11]. Available from:
  • 9 National Library of Medicine. Joshua Lederberg: Profiles in Science [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 10]. Available from:
  • 10 Shortliffe EH, Rindfleisch TC. Presentation of the Morris F. Collen Award to Joshua Lederberg, PhD. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000 May-Jun;7(3):326-32.
  • 11 Tatro DS, Briggs RL, Chavez-Pardo R, Feinberg LS, Hannigan JF, Moore TN, et al. Detection and prevention of drug interactions utilizing an on-line computer system. Drug Inf J 1975 Jan-Apr;9(1):10-7.
  • 12 National Library of Medicine. Stanley N. Cohen Papers: Open for Research [Internet]. Circulating Now from NLM. 2019 [cited 2022 May 10]. Available from: