CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2022; 31(01): 199-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742528
Section 6: Decision Support
Synopsis

Clinical Decision Support Systems: Contributions from 2021

Damian Borbolla
1   Wolters Kluwer Health and Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Tiago K. Colicchio
2   Informatics Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
› Author Affiliations

Summary

Objectives: To summarize significant research contributions published in 2021 in the field of clinical decision support (CDS) systems and select the best papers for the Decision Support section of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook.

Methods: The authors searched the MEDLINE® database for papers focused on clinical decision support (CDS) systems. From search results, section editors established a list of candidate best papers, which were then peer-reviewed by at least three external reviewers. The IMIA Yearbook editorial committee selected the best papers on the basis of all reviews including the section editors’ evaluation.

Results: A total of 337 articles were retrieved from which 13 candidate papers were identified. Finally, from the candidate papers, the top three papers were selected. The first paper introduces an innovative evaluation approach to CDS systems, the second compares six health institutions on how they are measuring CDS alert fatigue and the last one adds new evidence on how CDS can help to reduce unnecessary interventions.

Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Decision Support Systems




Publication History

Article published online:
04 December 2022

© 2022. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Stipelman CH, Kukhareva PV, Trepman E, Nguyen Q-T, Valdez L, Kenost C, et al. Electronic Health Record-Integrated Clinical Decision Support for Clinicians Serving Populations Facing Health Care Disparities: Literature Review. Yearb Med Inform 2022:184-98.
  • 2 Lamy JB, Séroussi B, Griffon N, Kerdelhué G, Jaulent MC, Bouaud J. Toward a formalization of the process to select IMIA Yearbook best papers. Methods Inf Med 2015;54(2):135-44.
  • 3 Oluoch T, Cornet R, Muthusi J, Katana A, Kimanga D, Kwaro D, et al. A clinical decision support system is associated with reduced loss to follow-up among patients receiving HIV treatment in Kenya: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021 Dec 20;21(1):357.
  • 4 Stephens AB, Wynn CS, Hofstetter AM, Kolff C, Pena O, Kahn E, et al. Effect of Electronic Health Record Reminders for Routine Immunizations and Immunizations Needed for Chronic Medical Conditions. Appl Clin Inform 2021 Oct;12(5):1101-9.
  • 5 Solberg LI, Hooker SA, Rossom RC, Bergdall A, Crabtree BF. Clinician Perceptions About a Decision Support System to Identify and Manage Opioid Use Disorder. J Am Board Fam Med 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):1096-102.
  • 6 Rizk E, Swan JT. Development, Validation, and Assessment of Clinical Impact of Real-time Alerts to Detect Inpatient As-Needed Opioid Orders With Duplicate Indications: Prospective Study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e28235.
  • 7 Orenstein EW, Kandaswamy S, Muthu N, Chaparro JD, Hagedorn PA, Dziorny AC, et al. Alert burden in pediatric hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis of six academic pediatric health systems using novel metrics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2654-60.
  • 8 Zakim D, Brandberg H, El Amrani S, Hultgren A, Stathakarou N, Nifakos S, et al. Computerized history-taking improves data quality for clinical decision-making-Comparison of EHR and computer-acquired history data in patients with chest pain. PLoS One 2021 Sep 27;16(9):e0257677.
  • 9 Andruchow JE, Grigat D, McRae AD, Innes G, Vatanpour S, Wang D, et al. Decision support for computed tomography in the emergency department: a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial. CJEM 2021 Sep;23(5):631-40.
  • 10 Seol HY, Shrestha P, Muth JF, Wi CI, Sohn S, Ryu E, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted clinical decision support for childhood asthma management: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255261.
  • 11 Orenstein EW, ElSayed-Ali O, Kandaswamy S, Masterson E, Blanco R, Shah P, Lantis et al. Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Strategy to Increase Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among Hospitalized Children Before Inpatient Discharge. JAMA Netw Open 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117809.
  • 12 Dente CJ, Mina MJ, Morse BC, Hensman H, Schobel S, Gelbard RB, et al. Predicting the need for massive transfusion: Prospective validation of a smartphone-based clinical decision support tool. Surgery 2021 Nov;170(5):1574-80.
  • 13 Dutta S, McEvoy DS, Stump T, McCabe J, Mahendra-Rajah A, McMurry R, et al. Clinical Decision Support Reduces Unnecessary Tetanus Vaccinations in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2021 Sep;78(3):370-80.
  • 14 Austrian J, Mendoza F, Szerencsy A, Fenelon L, Horwitz LI, Jones S, et al. Applying A/B Testing to Clinical Decision Support: Rapid Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res 2021 Apr 9;23(4):e16651.
  • 15 Saegerman C, Gilbert A, Donneau AF, Gangolf M, Diep AN, Meex C, et al. Clinical decision support tool for diagnosis of COVID-19 in hospitals. PLoS One 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247773.
  • 16 Gallo A. A Refresher on A/B Testing. Harvard Business Review 2021. Available from: https://hbr.org/2017/06/a-refresher-on-ab-testing