Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2022; 11(01): 064-072
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742358
Case Report

Non-Surgical Approach to Correct Skeletal Open-Bite Malocclusion in an Adult Patient Using Third Molar Intrusion Mechanics: A Clinical Case Report

Saima Nizar Hirji 
1   Department of Orthodontics, The Dental Centre, Nairobi, Kenya
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Paradigm is shifting in the orthodontic world with the introduction of mini screw type of temporary anchorage devices (TADs). This clinical report shows treatment and 3-year retention results of nonsurgical and extraction treatment in a 34-year-old female patient treated with maxillary molar intrusion mechanics and habit control. After 24 months of active orthodontic treatment, splendid outcomes were achieved. She presented with a chief complaint of problems in biting from her front teeth. She has a Class II skeletal and dental relationship with increased vertical proportions. Control of vertical dimension and producing autorotation of mandible were the key reasons to reduce facial convexity and improvement in profile. Treatment effects of 5 degrees of autorotation of mandible and 4 mm of maxillary molar intrusion were produced to correct pre-treatment anterior open bite of 5 mm. Based on available clinical evidence, we suggest that TADs with composite buttons on molars can be used as a valuable tool to intrude molars including wisdom teeth, and help correct the skeletal open-bite with good control without buccal tipping.

Keywords

skeletal open bite - temporary anchorage devices - maxillary molar intrusion


Publication History

Article published online:
07 March 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Espeland L, Dowling PA, Mobarak KA, Stenvik A. Three-year stability of open-bite correction by 1-piece maxillary osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (01) 60-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Openbite: Diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 337-358
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M. et al. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002; 17 (04) 243-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cabrera MdeC, Cabrera CAG, de Freitas KM, Janson G, de Freitas MR. Lateral open bite: treatment and stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (05) 701-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Melsen B, McNamara Jr JA, Hoenie DC. The effect of bite-blocks with and without repelling magnets studied histomorphometrically in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108 (05) 500-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Park YC, Lee HA, Choi NC, Kim DH. Open bite correction by intrusion of posterior teeth with miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2008; 78 (04) 699-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stuani MBS, Stuani AS, Stuani AS. Modified Thurow appliance: a clinical alternative for correcting skeletal open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (01) 118-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lawry DM, Heggie AA, Crawford EC, Ruljancich MK. A review of the management of anterior open bite malocclusion. Aust Orthod J 1990; 11 (03) 147-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Denny JM, Weiskircher MA, Dorminey JC. Anterior open bite and overjet treated with camouflage therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131 (05) 670-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nielsen IL. Vertical malocclusions: etiology, development, diagnosis and some aspects of treatment. Angle Orthod 1991; 61 (04) 247-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deguchi T, Kurosaka H, Oikawa H. et al. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139 (4, Suppl) S60-S68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146 (05) 594-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alsafadi AS, Alabdullah MM, Saltaji H, Abdo A, Youssef M. Effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices in patients with anterior open bite: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2016; 17: 9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Goto S, Boyd RL, Iizuka T. Case report: nonsurgical treatment of an adult with severe anterior open bite. Angle Orthod 1994; 64 (04) 311-318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Janson G, Valarelli FP, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, Cançado RH. Stability of anterior open bite nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124 (03) 265-276 , quiz 340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chang YI, Moon SC. Cephalometric evaluation of the anterior open bite treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115 (01) 29-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vaden JL. The vertical dimension: the “low-angle” patient. World J Orthod 2005; 6 (02) 115-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Janson G, Valarelli FP, Beltrão RTS, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF. Stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129 (06) 768-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS, Chen J, Koepsell T, Hujoel P. Stability of treatment for anterior open-bite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139 (02) 154-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, Polimeni A. Sucking habits and facial hyperdivergency as risk factors for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (04) 517-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Heimer MV, Tornisiello Katz CR, Rosenblatt A. Non-nutritive sucking habits, dental malocclusions, and facial morphology in Brazilian children: a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30 (06) 580-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Tongue-thrust therapy and anterior dental open-bite. A review of new facial growth data. Am J Orthod 1972; 62 (03) 287-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Urzal V, Braga AC, Ferreira AP. Oral habits as risk factors for anterior open bite in the deciduous and mixed dentition - cross-sectional study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013; 14 (04) 299-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dixit UB, Shetty RM. Comparison of soft-tissue, dental, and skeletal characteristics in children with and without tongue thrusting habit. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4 (01) 2-6 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.111585.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar