Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(01): 090-102
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742346
Review Article

Hemodialysis Catheters: Update on Types, Outcomes, Designs and Complications

Husameddin El Khudari
1   Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Merve Ozen
2   Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
,
Bridget Kowalczyk
3   Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Juri Bassuner
4   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Ammar Almehmi
5   Department of Radiology and Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Hemodialysis catheters (HDCs) are an essential part of kidney replacement therapy. While these catheters are considered only the bridge to long-term vascular access such as arteriovenous fistulas and grafts, they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and subsequent increased health care expenditures. However, despite these risks, a large proportion of end stage kidney disease population initiates dialysis using these catheters. The pathogenicity of HDCs stems from its invasive nature to the venous vasculature tree resulting in both mechanical and infectious complications. Therefore, the wide use these catheters in dialysis population and the associated complications necessitated continuous innovations in the catheter material, design, and placement techniques. This review provides an update on the catheter types, catheter tip designs, and the new technologies and innovations aimed to improve the catheter functionality and mitigate its related complications.



Publication History

Article published online:
18 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Murea M, Geary RL, Davis RP, Moossavi S. Vascular access for hemodialysis: A perpetual challenge. Semin Dial 2019; 32 (06) 527-534
  • 2 Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC. et al. US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75 (1, Suppl 1) A6-A7
  • 3 Vesely TM, Ravenscroft A. Hemodialysis catheter tip design: observations on fluid flow and recirculation. J Vasc Access 2016; 17 (01) 29-39
  • 4 Silverstein DM, Trerotola SO, Clark T. et al; Kidney Health Initiative HDF Workgroup. Clinical and Regulatory Considerations for Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13 (12) 1924-1932
  • 5 Schwab SJ, Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: hate living with them, but can't live without them. Kidney Int 1999; 56 (01) 1-17
  • 6 Vats HS. Complications of catheters: tunneled and nontunneled. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012; 19 (03) 188-194
  • 7 Tal MG, Ni N. Selecting optimal hemodialysis catheters: material, design, advanced features, and preferences. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 11 (03) 186-191
  • 8 Huriaux L, Costille P, Quintard H, Journois D, Kellum JA, Rimmelé T. Haemodialysis catheters in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2017; 36 (05) 313-319
  • 9 Allon M. Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: treatment and prophylaxis. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44 (05) 779-791
  • 10 Tal MG, Peixoto AJ, Crowley ST, Denbow N, Eliseo D, Pollak J. Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow hemodialysis catheters. Hemodial Int 2006; 10 (01) 63-67
  • 11 Lawson JH, Niklason LE, Roy-Chaudhury P. Challenges and novel therapies for vascular access in haemodialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020; 16 (10) 586-602
  • 12 Po CL, Koolpe HA, Allen S, Alvez LD, Raja RM. Transhepatic PermCath for hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24 (04) 590-591
  • 13 Younes HK, Pettigrew CD, Anaya-Ayala JE. et al. Transhepatic hemodialysis catheters: functional outcome and comparison between early and late failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22 (02) 183-191
  • 14 Robards JB, Jaques PF, Mauro MA, Azizkhan RG. Percutaneous translumbar inferior vena cava central line placement in a critically ill child. Pediatr Radiol 1989; 19 (02) 140-141
  • 15 Liu F, Bennett S, Arrigain S. et al. Patency and Complications of Translumbar Dialysis Catheters. Semin Dial 2015; 28 (04) E41-E47
  • 16 Nadolski GJ, Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Farrelly C. Translumbar hemodialysis catheters in patients with limited central venous access: does patient size matter?. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (07) 997-1002
  • 17 Maya ID, Allon M. Outcomes of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters: comparison with internal jugular vein catheters. Kidney Int 2005; 68 (06) 2886-2889
  • 18 Bhutta ST, Culp WC. Evaluation and management of central venous access complications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 14 (04) 217-224
  • 19 Vesely TM. Air embolism during insertion of central venous catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (11) 1291-1295
  • 20 Sahutoglu T, Sakaci T, Hasbal NB. et al. Air embolism following removal of hemodialysis catheter. Hemodial Int 2017; 21 (01) 29-34
  • 21 Garnacho-Montero J, Aldabó-Pallás T, Palomar-Martínez M. et al. Risk factors and prognosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: a multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34 (12) 2185-2193
  • 22 Donati G, Spazzoli A, Croci Chiocchini AL. et al. Bloodstream infections and patient survival with tunneled-cuffed catheters for hemodialysis: A single-center observational study. Int J Artif Organs 2020; 43 (12) 767-773
  • 23 Schwanke AA, Danski MTR, Pontes L, Kusma SZ, Lind J. Central venous catheter for hemodialysis: incidence of infection and risk factors. Rev Bras Enferm 2018; 71 (03) 1115-1121
  • 24 Lacson Jr E, Lazarus JM, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, Hakim RM. Balancing Fistula First with Catheters Last. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50 (03) 379-395
  • 25 Golestaneh L, Mokrzycki MH. Prevention of hemodialysis catheter infections: Ointments, dressings, locks, and catheter hub devices. Hemodial Int 2018; 22 (S2): S75-S82
  • 26 Apata IW, Hanfelt J, Bailey JL, Niyyar VD. Chlorhexidine-impregnated transparent dressings decrease catheter-related infections in hemodialysis patients: a quality improvement project. J Vasc Access 2017; 18 (02) 103-108
  • 27 Rabindranath KS, Bansal T, Adams J. et al. Systematic review of antimicrobials for the prevention of haemodialysis catheter-related infections. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24 (12) 3763-3774
  • 28 Mai H, Zhao Y, Salerno S. et al. Citrate versus heparin lock for prevention of hemodialysis catheter-related complications: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51 (06) 1019-1033
  • 29 Hymes JL, Mooney A, Van Zandt C, Lynch L, Ziebol R, Killion D. Dialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of the ClearGuard HD Antimicrobial Barrier Cap. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 69 (02) 220-227
  • 30 Fujimoto K, Iida E, Kumano S. et al. Effect of sutureless securement on hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 21771
  • 31 Gunawansa N, Sudusinghe DH, Wijayaratne DR. Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Central Venous Thrombosis: Clinical Approach to Evaluation and Management. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 51: 298-305
  • 32 Allon M. Quantification of Complications of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 73 (04) 462-464
  • 33 Janne d'Othée B, Tham JC, Sheiman RG. Restoration of patency in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (06) 1011-1015
  • 34 Yevzlin AS. Hemodialysis catheter-associated central venous stenosis. Semin Dial 2008; 21 (06) 522-527
  • 35 Oliver MJ, Edwards LJ, Treleaven DJ, Lambert K, Margetts PJ. Randomized study of temporary hemodialysis catheters. Int J Artif Organs 2002; 25 (01) 40-44
  • 36 Van Der Meersch H, De Bacquer D, Vandecasteele SJ. et al. Hemodialysis catheter design and catheter performance: a randomized controlled trial. [published correction appears in Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 May;65(5):810] Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 64 (06) 902-908
  • 37 Hwang HS, Kang SH, Choi SR, Sun IO, Park HS, Kim Y. Comparison of the palindrome vs. step-tip tunneled hemodialysis catheter: a prospective randomized trial. Semin Dial 2012; 25 (05) 587-591
  • 38 Clark TW, Redmond JW, Mantell MP. et al. Initial Clinical Experience: Symmetric-Tip Dialysis Catheter with Helical Flow Characteristics Improves Patient Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (10) 1501-1508
  • 39 Nadolski GJ, Redmond J, Shin B. et al. Comparison of Clinical Performance of VectorFlow and Palindrome Symmetric-Tip Dialysis Catheters: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31 (07) 1148-1155
  • 40 Agarwal AK, Ash SR. Principal Investigators of the CentrosFLO Trial. Maintenance of blood flow rate on dialysis with self-centering CentrosFLO catheter: A multicenter prospective study. Hemodial Int 2016; 20 (04) 501-509
  • 41 Agarwal AK. Central vein stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61 (06) 1001-1015
  • 42 May RM, Magin CM, Mann EE. et al. An engineered micropattern to reduce bacterial colonization, platelet adhesion and fibrin sheath formation for improved biocompatibility of central venous catheters. Clin Transl Med 2015; 4: 9