Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2017; 126(01/02): 42-44
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-123945
Fortbildung/Prothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Antagonisten-Verschleiß auf dem Prüfstand

Manfred Kern
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 March 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Gewinner des Forschungspreises der AG Keramik untersuchten Substanzverlust durch Zirkonoxid-Kronen, Lithiumdisilikat und CAD/CAM-Komposit.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Horvath SD, Spitznagel FA, Gierthmühlen PC. Hybridmaterialien – Indikation und Bewährung. Zahnärztl. Mitteil 2016; 106: 56-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Magne P, Silva M, Oderich E. et al. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Magne P, Knezevic A. Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue restistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 729-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1264-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 125-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Xu KQ, Wang YU. Advanced tooth wear and restoration. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1994; 29 (02) 112-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Xu J. The properties of dentin and resinified dentin in the tensiile test. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1989; 24: 197-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M. et al. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 55: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar