Download PDF
Hebamme 2016; 29(06): 389-396
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122208
Geburtshilfe
S1-Leitlinie Terminüberschreitung
Hippokrates Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Terminüberschreitung: Stellungnahme zur S1-Leitlinie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft e.V.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft (DGHWi) e.V. setzt sich mit der überarbeiteten Fassung der S1-Leitlinie zum Vorgehen bei Terminüberschreitung und Übertragung auseinander. Begrifflichkeiten werden eingeordnet und Inhalte kritisch beurteilt sowie erklärend dargestellt.

 

  • Literatur:

  • 1 Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014; 6 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001338.pub3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Berger Z. Navigating the unknown: shared decision-making in the face of uncertainty. Journal of general internal medicine 2015; 30 (5): 675-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bergsjo P, Huang GD, Yu SQ, Gao ZZ, Bakketeig LS. Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1989; 68 (8): 683-687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Butt K, Lim K. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal d‘obstetrique et gyneco-logie du Canada: JOGC 2014; 36 (2): 171-183
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Caughey AB. Increasing rates of induction do not increase caesareans. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2015; 122 (7): 981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 DeMott RK, Sandmire HF. The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 162 (6): 1593-1599; discussion 1599–1602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 DeMott RK, Sandmire HF. The Green Bay cesarean section study. II. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for failed labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 166 (6 Pt 1): 1799-1806 discussion 1806–1810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Doubilet PM. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?. Seminars in perinatology 2013; 37 (5): 307-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2003; (1) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P. et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of general internal medicine 2012; 27 (10): 1361-1367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2010; 341: c5146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K. et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet 2011; 377 (9774): 1331-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Frøen J, Arnestad M, Frey K, Vege Å, Saugstad OD, Stray-Pedersen B. Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: Epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001; 184 (4): 694-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2013; 346: f108
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy. BJOG: An inter-national journal of O&G 1997; 104 (7): 792-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients to make sense of health statistics.: Psychological Science in the Public Interest.. 2007 Available from: URL: http://citrixweb.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/montez/upload/PaperLibrary/GG_etAl_Helping_doctors-1.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012; 6 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A. Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term Pregnancy: New England Journal of Medicine. N Engl J Med 1992; 326 (24): 1587-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson L, Salvesen KA. Women’s experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2007; 8 6(8): 950-956
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Henry GR. A controlled trial of surgical induction of labour and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy. The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1969; 76 (9): 795-798
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Herabutya Y, Prasertsawat PO, Tongyai T, Isarangura Na Ayudthya N. Prolonged pregnancy: the management dilemma. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1992; 37 (4): 253-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1998; 105 (2): 169-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2001; (2) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003093.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2005; (3) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003392.pub2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2001; (2) DOI: 101002/14651858.CD003099.pub2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Knight M, Tuffnell D, Brocklehurst P, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ. Incidence and risk factors for amniotic-fluid embolism. Obstetrics and gynecology 2010; 115 (5): 910-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kreienbrock L, Pigeot I, Ahrens W. Epidemiologische Methoden. 5.. Aufl. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2012. Available from URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2334-4
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. et al. Births: final data for 2005. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System 2007; 56 (6): 1-103
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Neilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2000; (2) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Induction of labour. 2008 Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg70/chapter/guidance
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978–1993. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 189 (1): 222-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pilalis A, Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Michalitsi V, Panagopoulos P, Chrelias C. et al. Third trimester ultrasound for the prediction of the large for gestational age fetus in low-risk population and evaluation of contingency strategies. Prenatal diagnosis 2012; 32 (9): 846-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Reddy UM, Ko C, Willinger M. Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 195 (3): 764-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sahraoui W, Hajji S, Bibi M, Nouira M, Essaidi H, Khairi H. Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one week‘s gestation with an unfavorable cervix. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction 2005; 34 (5): 454-462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 170 (6): 1790-1799 discussion 1799–1802
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. The Green Bay cesarean section study. IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 174 (5): 1557-1564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schwarz C, Schäfers R, Loytved C, Heusser P, Abou-Dakn M, König T. et al. Temporal trends in fetal mortality at and beyond term and induction of labor in Germany 2005–2012: data from German routine perinatal monitoring. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics; 2015 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3795-x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schwarz C, Weiss E, Loytved C, Schäfers R, König T, Heusser P. et al. Fetale Mortalität bei Einlingen ab Termin – eine Analyse bundesdeutscher Perinataldaten 2004–2013. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 2015; 219 (2): 81-85
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Smith GC. Use of time to event analysis to estimate the normal duration of human pregnancy. Human Reproduction 2001; 16 (7): 1497-1500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Weiss E, Krombholz K, Eichner M. Fetal mortality at and beyond term in singleton pregnancies in Baden-Wuerttemberg/Germany 2004-2009. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2014; 289 (1): 79-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wennerholm U, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2009; 88 (1): 6-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 2000; 32 (7271): 1259-1262
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Yudkin PL, Wood L, Redman CW. Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages. Lancet (London, England) 1987; 1 (8543): 1192-1194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar