Laryngorhinootologie 2017; 96(S 01): S43-S65
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-120046
Referat
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hörgeräte: Indikationen, Technologie, Anpassung und Qualitätskontrolle

Hearing Aids: Indications, Technology, Adaptation and Quality control
Ulrich Hoppe
1   Audiologische Abteilung, Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
,
Gerhard Hesse
2   Tinnitus-Klinik am Krankenhaus Bad Arolsen, Universität Witten-Herdecke
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 May 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Da nach wie vor eine kausale Behandlung von Schwerhörigkeiten, die durch Schädigungen der Strukturen des Innenohres bedingt sind, nicht verfügbar ist, steht für die Therapie von Schwerhörigkeit die apparative Hörrehabilitation im Vordergrund. Gleichzeitig haben sich die Qualität und technische Möglichkeiten der Hörgeräteversorgung in den letzten 10–15 Jahren deutlich verbessert. Besonders die moderne „offene Anpassung“ hat die Akzeptanz für Hörgeräte, vor allem aber die Rehabiltation von Hochtonhörschwerhörigkeiten entscheidend verbessert. Dennoch sind die Bereitschaft der Betroffenen, sich versorgen zu lassen, aber auch der HNO-Ärzte, möglichst frühzeitig zu versorgen, sicher noch verbesserungsfähig. Aktuelle Forschungen machen jedoch deutlich, dass es sinnvoll ist, Schwerhörige bereits sehr früh und auch bereits mittelgradige Hörverluste apparativ zu versorgen. Dies beugt einer kortikalen auditiven Deprivation und damit auch drohenden sozialen Isolationen bis hin zu Demenzentwicklungen und Intelligenzverlusten vor, ist aber auch zugleich eine sinnvolle Therapie, um Begleitsymptome wie Tinnitus und Geräuschüberempfindlichkeiten lindern zu können. Dieses Referat soll die Indikationen, die technischen Möglichkeiten und den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur Hörgerätetechnologie, -akzeptanz und zu Besonderheiten in der Versorgung Schwerhöriger aufzeigen.

Abstract

Hearing loss can be caused by a number of different pathological conditions. Some of them can be successfully treated, mainly by surgery, depending on the individual’s disease process. However, the treatment of chronic sensorineural hearing loss with damaged cochlear structures usually needs hearing rehabilitation by means of technical amplification. During the last 2 decades tremendous improvements in hearing aid technology led to a higher quality in the hearing rehabilitation process. For example, due to sophisticated signal processing the acoustic feedback path could be reduced and hence open fitting options are available for even more subjects. In particular for high-frequency hearing loss the use of open fitting is an option. Both the users’ acceptance and the perceived sound quality were significantly increased by open fittings.However, we are still faced with a low level of readiness in many hearing impaired subjects to accept acoustic amplification. Since ENT specialists play a key-role in hearing aid provision, they should promote early hearing aid rehabilitation and include this in the counselling even in subjects with mild and moderate hearing loss. Recent investigations demonstrated the benefit of early hearing aid use in this group of patients since this may help to reduce subsequent damages as auditory deprivation, social isolation, development of dementia, and cognitive decline. For subjects with tinnitus, hearing aids may also support masking by environmental sounds and enhance cortical inhibition.The present paper describes the latest development of hearing aid technology and the current state of the art for amplification modalities. Implications for both hearing aid indication and provision are discussed.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 AWMF. Leitlinie Hörsturz. Leitlinien der Dt Ges f Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie 2014; Leitlinie 017/010: 1–10
  • 2 Sng J, Lufkin T. Filling the silent void: genetic therapies for hearing impairment. Genetics research international 2012; 2012: 748698
  • 3 Kohrman DC, Raphael Y. Gene therapy for deafness. Gene Ther 2013; DOI: 10.1038/gt.2013.39.
  • 4 Atkinson PJ, Wise AK, Flynn BO. et al. Neurotrophin gene therapy for sustained neural preservation after deafness. PLoS One 2012; 7: e52338
  • 5 Klemm E, Deutscher A, Mosges R. A present investigation of the epidemiology in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngorhinootologie 2009; 88: 524–527
  • 6 Ibekwe T, Ramma L, Chindo B. Potential roles of stem cells in the management of sensorineural hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol 2012; 25: 1-5
  • 7 Geleoc GS, Holt JR. Sound strategies for hearing restoration. Science 2014; 344: 1241062
  • 8 Kinkel M. Hörgeräte. In: ELLaszig R. (Hrsg.) Praxis der Audiometrie. 9. Aufl Stuttgart: Thieme-Verlag; 2009: 165-187
  • 9 Kießling J, Kreikemeier S. Gebrauchsnutzen moderner Hörsysteme. Eine vergleichende Studie. HNO 2013; 61: 662-671
  • 10 Hesse G. Hörgeräte im Alter. HNO 2004; 52: 321-328
  • 11 Nash SD, Cruickshanks KJ, Huang GH. et al. Unmet hearing health care needs: the beaver dam offspring study. Am J Public Health 2013; DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301031.
  • 12 Versorgung (Hilfsmittel-Richtlinie/HilfsM-RL). Bundesanzeiger 2012; DOI: 1–13.
  • 13 McArdle R, Killion M, Mennite M. et al. Are two ears not better than one?. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23: 171-181
  • 14 Kaplan-Neeman R, Muchnik C, Hildesheimer M. et al. Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era. Laryngoscope 2012; 122: 2029-2036
  • 15 Saunders G, Lewis M, Forsline A. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20: 320-334
  • 16 Hesse G, Schaaf H. Manual der Hörtherapie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2012
  • 17 Gesundheit GBbBf. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Verordnung von Hilfsmitteln in der vertragsärztlichen Versorgung (Hilfsmittel-Richtlinie/HilfsM-RL). Bundesanzeiger 2014; 1-13
  • 18 Braun B, Dietrich A, Akcicek B. et al. Hearing aid fitting: Effect of doubling the standard rate on compliance, quality of results, and excess payments. HNO 2015; 63: 850-856
  • 19 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B. et al. Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice: Part 1 New regulations pertaining to hearing aid fitting. HNO 2014; 62: 605-612
  • 20 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B. et al. Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice: Part 2 New diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry. HNO 2014; 62: 667-682
  • 21 Michel O, Wolf U, Brusis T. Aus der Gutachtenpraxis: Die neue Rahmenvereinbarung über die Versorgung mit Hörsystemen in der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2015; 94: 328-330
  • 22 Chandra N, Searchfield GD. Perceptions Toward Internet-Based Delivery of Hearing Aids among Older Hearing-Impaired Adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2016; 27: 441-457
  • 23 Laskawi R, Winterhoff J, Blum J. et al. Botulinum toxin to treat sweat caused sequelae in patients with hearing aids, active middle ear implants and cochlear implants. HNO 2012; 60: 1007-1010
  • 24 Manchaiah V, Arthur J, Williams H. Does hearing aid use increase the likelihood of cerumen impaction?. Journal of audiology & otology 2015; 19: 168-171
  • 25 Perez E, Edmonds B. A Systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31831
  • 26 Halpin C, Rauch S. Improvement in word recognition score with level is associated with hearing aid ownership among patients with hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 2011; 17: 139-147
  • 27 Bainbridge KE, Ramachandran V. Hearing aid use among older U.S. adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006 and 2009–2010. Ear and hearing 2014; DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000441036.40169.29.
  • 28 Fischer M, Cruickshanks K, Wiley T. et al. Determinants of hearing aid acquisition in older adults. Am J Public Health 2011; 101: 1449-1455
  • 29 Hartley D, Rochtchina E, Newall P. et al. Use of hearing AIDS and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 642-653
  • 30 Ribas A, Mafra N, Marques J. et al. Dichotic hearing in elderly hearing aid users who choose to use a single-ear device. International archives of otorhinolaryngology 2014; 18: 347-351
  • 31 Carioli J, Teixeira AR. Use of hearing AIDS and functional capacity in middle-aged and elderly individuals. International archives of otorhinolaryngology 2014; 18: 249-254
  • 32 Rawool V, Keihl J. Perception of hearing status, communication, and hearing aids among socially active older individuals. J Otolaryngol 2008; 37: 27-42
  • 33 Aazh H, Prasher D, Nanchahal K. et al. Hearing-aid use and its determinants in the UK National Health Service: a cross-sectional study at the Royal Surrey County Hospital. International Journal of Audiology 2015; 54: 152-161
  • 34 Fisher DE, Li CM, Hoffman HJ. et al. Sex-specific predictors of hearing-aid use in older persons: The age, gene/environment susceptibility – Reykjavik study. International journal of audiology 2015; 10.3109/14992027.2015.1024889: 1-8
  • 35 Muller A, Hocke T, Hoppe U. et al. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry]. HNO 2016; 64: 143-148
  • 36 Desjardins JL. The Effects of hearing aid directional microphone and noise reduction processing on listening effort in older adults with hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2016; 27: 29-41
  • 37 Chang W, Tseng H, Chao T. et al. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: Comparison between young and old elderly. Otolaryng Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 730-734
  • 38 Singh G, Pichora-Fuller M, Hayes D. et al. The aging hand and the ergonomics of hearing aid controls. Ear Hear 2012; 0 Epub ahead of print
  • 39 Solheim J. Preconceptions and expectations of older adults about getting hearing aids. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011; 6: 1-8
  • 40 Staehelin K, Bertoli S, Probst R. et al. Gender and hearing aids: patterns of use and determinants of nonregular use. Ear Hear 2011; 26: Epub ahead of print
  • 41 Kießling J. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der modernen Hörgeräteversorgung. Besser Hören und Verstehen. HNONachrichten 1999; 29:
  • 42 AWMF. Leitlinie Hörgeräteversorgung 1998; 17/065
  • 43 Wedel v,H, Wedel U-Cv. Zur apparativen Versorgung von Tinnituspatienten mit Hörhilfen. HNO aktuell 1996; 4: 81-108
  • 44 Hellbrück J. Strukturelle Veränderungen des Hörfeldes in Abhängigkeit vom Lebensalter. Z Gerontol 1988; 21: 146-149
  • 45 Kießling J, J. K, Diller G. Versorgung und Rehabilitation mit Hörgeräten. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 1997
  • 46 Hesse G. Innenohrschwerhörigkeit. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2015
  • 47 Foerst A, Beutner D, Lang-Roth R. et al. Prevalence of auditory neuropathy/synaptopathy in a population of children with profound hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2006; 70: 1415-1422
  • 48 Ptok M, Schwemmle C. Hörgeräteversorgung bei Kindern mit Hörschwierigkeiten trotz eines normalen peripheren Hörvermögens – Erfassung der elterlichen Zufriedenheit. Larygo-Rhino-Otol 2008; 87: 23-29
  • 49 Rosanowski FCR, Hoppe U. Hörgeräte bei normalhörigen Kindern mit eingeschränktem Sprachverstehen im Störgeräusch. In, 19 Jahrestagung der deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie 2016; 3: 9-12 Tagungs-CD; 2016
  • 50 de Boer E, Viergever MA. Wave propagation and dispersion in the cochlea. Hearing research 1984; 13: 101-112
  • 51 Hüls R. Die Geschichte der Hörakustik Heidelberg: Median-Verlag; 1999
  • 52 Simpson A. Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review. Trends Amplif 2009; 13: 87-106
  • 53 Miller CWBE, Brennan M. The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 2016; 55: 305-312
  • 54 Dillon H. Hearing aids. New York: Thieme; 2012
  • 55 Kochkin S, MarkeTrak VII. Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. The Hearing Journal 2005; 58: 30-39
  • 56 DGA. Konsensus-Statement des Fachausschusses Hörgerätetechnologie und -versorgung der DGA: Hörgeräteanpassung- und -überprüfung. Z Audiol 2009; 48: 171-175
  • 57 Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear and hearing 1986; 7: 257-265
  • 58 MCCandless G, Lyregaard PE. Prescription of gain/output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hearing Instruments 1983; 34: 16-21
  • 59 Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1854-1864
  • 60 Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M. et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 891-903
  • 61 AWMF. Periphere Hörstörungen im Kindesalter. 049-010 2013; S2K
  • 62 Hoppe U. Hörgeräteerfolgskontrolle mit dem Freiburger Einsilbertest. HNO 2016; 64: 589-594
  • 63 Hoppe U, Hast A, Hocke T. [Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss]. HNO 2014; 62: 443-448
  • 64 Kollmeier B, Lenarz T, Winkler A. et al. Hörgeräteindikation und -überprüfung nach modernen Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie im Deutschen. HNO 2011; 59: 1012-1021
  • 65 Thummler R, Liebscher T, Hoppe U. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing]. HNO 2016; 64: 595-600
  • 66 Meister H, Walger M, Brehmer D. et al. The relationship between pre-fitting expectations and willingness to use hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 2008; 47: 153-159
  • 67 Löhler J, Frohburg R, Moser L. The Use fo the German APHAB for Quality Control in Hearing Aid Fitting in an ENT-office. Comparison of our Results with the given US-Norm. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2010; 12: Epub ahead of print
  • 68 Löhler J, Moser L, Heinrich D. et al. Klinische Ergebnisse bei der Anwendung des APHAB (deutsche Version) in der Hörgeräteversorgung. Hno 2012; 60: 626-636
  • 69 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Kappe T. et al. Development and use of an APHAB database. HNO 2014; DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2915-4.
  • 70 Stengel ML. J Hörgeräteversorgung: Fachärztliche Versorgung angezeigt. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2014; 111: 430-431
  • 71 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Kappe T. et al. The Influence of hearing loss represented by standard audiogram types to unaided APHAB scores. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2016; DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111569.
  • 72 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B. et al. [Distribution and scattering of aphab answers before and after hearing aid fitting]. Laryngo-rhino-otologie 2016; DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107561.
  • 73 Lohler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B. et al. The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies 2016; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-3966-9.
  • 74 Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Ellis BB. et al. Hearing aid benefit in patients with mild sensorineural hearing loss: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2016; 27: 293-310
  • 75 Kelly-Campbell RJ, McMillan A. The relationship between hearing aid self-efficacy and hearing aid satisfaction. American journal of audiology 2015; DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0028:1-7.
  • 76 de Carvalho LM, Gonsalez EC, Iorio MC. Speech perception in noise in the elderly: interactions between cognitive performance, depressive symptoms, and education. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.017.
  • 77 Maeda Y, Sugaya A, Nagayasu R. et al. Subjective hearing-related quality-of-life is a major factor in the decision to continue using hearing aids among older persons. Acta oto-laryngologica 2016; DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1183817: 1–4.
  • 78 Bennett RJ, Meyer C, Eikelboom RH. Does clinician continuity influence hearing aid outcomes?. International journal of audiology 2016; DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1185169: 1–8.
  • 79 Ferguson M, Maidment D, Russell N. et al. Motivational engagement in first-time hearing aid users: A feasibility study. International Journal of audiology 2016; DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1133935:1-11.
  • 80 Cox RM, Johnson JA, Xu J. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective. Ear and hearing 2016; DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000277.
  • 81 Schmidt J, Herzog D, Scharenborg O. et al. Do hearing aids improve affect perception?. Advances in experimental medicine and biology 2016; 894: 47-55
  • 82 Manchaiah V, Danermark B, Vinay B. et al. Social representation of hearing aids: cross-cultural study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. Clinical interventions in aging 2015; 10: 1601-1615
  • 83 Manchaiah V, Stein G, Danermark B. et al. Positive, Neutral, and negative connotations associated with social representation of 'hearing loss' and 'hearing aids'. Journal of audiology & otology 2015; 19: 132-137
  • 84 Hickson L, Wood J, Chaparro A. et al. Hearing impairment affects older people's ability to drive in the presence of distracters. J AM Geriatr Soc 2010; 58: 1097-1103
  • 85 Pronk M, Deeg DJ, Smits C. et al. Hearing loss in older persons: does the rate of decline affect psychosocial health?. Journal of Aging and Health 2014; DOI: 10.1177/0898264314529329.
  • 86 Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Rees TS. et al. Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 261: 1916-1919
  • 87 Lin F, Metter E, O'Brien R. et al. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 2011; 68: 214-220
  • 88 Gurgel RK, Ward PD, Schwartz S. et al. Relationship of hearing loss and dementia: a prospective, population-based study. Otol Neurotol 2014; DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000313.
  • 89 Burkhalter CL, Allen RS, Skaar DC. et al. Examining the effectiveness of traditional audiological assessments for nursing home residents with dementia-related behaviors. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20: 529-538
  • 90 Eichhorn S, Hesse G, Laubert A. Zur Detektion von Schwerhörigkeiten bei dementen Menschen: Pilotstudie und Literaturübersicht. HNO 2014; 93:
  • 91 Amieva H, Ouvrard C, Giulioli C. et al. Self-reported hearing loss, hearing aids, and cognitive decline in elderly adults: a 25-year study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2015; 63: 2099-2104
  • 92 Tremblay KL, Scollie S, Abrams HB. et al. Hearing AIDS and the brain. International Journal of Otolaryngology 2014; 2014: 518967
  • 93 Hornsby BW. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear and hearing 2013; 34: 523-534
  • 94 Choi A, Shim H, Lee S. et al. Is Cognitive function in adults with hearing impairment improved by the use of hearing aids?. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 4: 72-76
  • 95 Jastreboff PJ, Jastreboff M. Treatment for Decreased Sound Tolerance (Hyperacusis and Misophonia). Seminars in Hearing 2014; 35: 105-120
  • 96 Jastreboff PJ. 25 Years of tinnitus retraining therapy. HNO 2015; 63: 307-311
  • 97 Hesse G. Evidence and Lack of Evidence in the Treatment of Tinnitus. Laryngo-rhino-otologie 2016; 95: S155-S191
  • 98 Hesse G. Tinnitus. 2. Aufl Stuttgart: Thieme; 2015
  • 99 Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Sereda M. et al. Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014; 1: CD010151
  • 100 Zenner HP, Delb W, Kroner-Herwig B. et al. On the interdisciplinary S3 guidelines for the treatment of chronic idiopathic tinnitus. Hno 2015; 63: 419-427
  • 101 Moffat G, Adjout K, Gallego S. et al. Effects of hearing aid fitting on the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus. Hear Res 2009; 254: 82-91
  • 102 Peltier E, Peltier C, Tahar S. et al. Long-term tinnitus suppression with linear octave frequency transposition hearing AIDS. PloS one 2012; 7: e51915
  • 103 Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Kobayashi K. et al. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief. International journal of audiology 2013; DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.799787.
  • 104 Schaette R, König O, Hornig D. et al. Acoustic Stimulation Treatments Against Tinnitus Could Be Most Effective when Tinnitus Pitch is within the Stimulated Frequency Range. Hear Res 2010; 6 Epub ahead of print
  • 105 Ramakers GG, van Zon A, Stegeman I. et al. The effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with bilateral hearing loss: A systematic review. The Laryngoscope 2015; 125: 2584-2592
  • 106 Araujo Tde M, Iorio MC. Effect of sound amplification in speech perception in elderly with and without tinnitus. CoDAS 2015; 27: 319-325
  • 107 Jalilvand H, Pourbakht A, Haghani H. Hearing Aid or Tinnitus Masker: Which One Is the Best Treatment for Blast-Induced Tinnitus? The Results of a Long-Term Study on 974 Patients. Audiology & neuro-otology 2015; 20: 195-201
  • 108 Wallhausser-Franke E, Repik I, Delb W. et al. Long-term Development of Acute Tinnitus. Laryngo-rhino-otologie 2015; DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1550039.
  • 109 Olze H, Zahnert T, Hesse G. Hearing aids, implantable hearing aids and cochlear implants in chronic tinnitus therapy. HNO 2010; 3: Epub ahead of print
  • 110 Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A. et al. Einseitige Taubheit und Cochleaimplantat-Versorgung. HNO 2011; 59: 437-446
  • 111 Olze H, Szczepek A, Haupt H. et al. The impact of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, stress and quality of life in postlingually deafened patients. Audiology & Neuro-Otology 2012; 17: 2-11
  • 112 Olze H. Cochlear implants and tinnitus. HNO 2015; 63: 291-297
  • 113 Kim DK, Moon IS, Lim HJ. et al. Prospective, multicenter study on tinnitus changes after cochlear implantation. Audiology & Neuro-otology 2016; 21: 165-171
  • 114 Richter B, Zander M, Hohmann B. et al. Gehörschutz bei Musikern. HNO 2011; 59: 538-546
  • 115 Perrot X, Collet L. Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: a review. Hearing research 2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.010.
  • 116 Glyde H, Cameron S, Dillon H. et al. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing. Ear and hearing 2013; 34: 15-28
  • 117 Turner JG, Parrish JL, Zuiderveld L. et al. Acoustic experience alters the aged auditory system. Ear and hearing 2013; 34: 151-159
  • 118 Oda K, Kawase T, Takata Y. et al. Masking effects in patients with auditory neuropathy-possible involvement of suppression mechanism caused by normal outer hair cell function. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2013; 34: 868-876
  • 119 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. What makes adults with hearing impairment take up hearing aids or communication programs and achieve successful outcomes?. Ear & hearing 2012; 33: 79-93
  • 120 Madsen SM, Moore BC. Music and hearing aids. Trends in hearing 2014; 18
  • 121 Yu J, Jeon H, Song C. et al. Speech perception enhancement in elderly hearing aid users using an auditory training program for mobile devices. Geriatrics & gerontology international 2015; DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12678.
  • 122 Ferguson M, Brandreth M, Brassington W. et al. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of a multimedia educational program for first-time hearing aid Users. Ear and hearing 2016; 37: 123-136
  • 123 Abrams HB, Bock K, Irey RL. Can a Remotely Delivered Auditory Training Program Improve Speech-in-Noise Understanding?. American journal of audiology 2015; 24: 333-337