Endoscopy 2017; 49(02): 139-145
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119034
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Premedication with simethicone and N-acetylcysteine in improving visibility during upper endoscopy: a double-blind randomized trial

Luís Elvas
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Miguel Areia
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
2   CINTESIS – Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
Daniel Brito
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Susana Alves
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Sandra Saraiva
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Ana T. Cadime
1   Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted19 April 2016

accepted after revision16 September 2016

Publication Date:
16 November 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aim Upper endoscopy is the most common method for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract diseases. The aim of this study was to determine whether premedication with simethicone or N-acetylcysteine improves mucosal visualization during upper endoscopy.

Patients and methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 297 patients scheduled for upper endoscopy who were premedicated 15 – 30 minutes before the procedure with: 100 mL of water (placebo, group A); water plus 100 mg simethicone (group B); water plus 100 mg simethicone plus 600 mg N-acetylcysteine (group C). The primary outcome measure was the quality of mucosal visualization (score: excellent, adequate or inadequate).

Results The addition of simethicone (group B) or simethicone plus N-acetylcysteine to the water (group C) improved the visualization scores of endoscopies compared with water alone (group A). In particular, groups B and C produced a significantly higher percentage of endoscopies with excellent visualization for the esophagus (91.1 % and 86.7 %, respectively, vs. 71.4 % in group A; P < 0.001) and stomach (76.2 % and 74.5 % vs. 38.8 % in group A; P < 0.001). For the duodenum, the use of simethicone also showed an increase in the endoscopies with excellent visualization compared with water alone (85.1 % vs. 73.5 %; P = 0.042). There were no significant differences in scores between groups B and C or between gastric scores in patients with previous subtotal gastrectomy (B and C vs. A): 60.0 % and 42.1 % vs. 28.6 % (P = 0.14). The rate of reported lesions was higher in group B but without statistical significance.

Conclusions Premedication with simethicone resulted in better mucosal visibility. Such premedication might improve diagnostic yield, and should be considered for standard practice.

Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02357303).

 
  • References

  • 1 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. In: GLOBOCAN 2012 v10 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013 Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed: 19 April 2015
  • 2 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC. et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 74-94
  • 3 Areia M, Pimentel-Nunes P, Marcos-Pinto R. et al. Gastric cancer: an opportunity for prevention. Acta Med Port 2013; 26: 627-629
  • 4 Areia M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rocha Goncalves F. Cost-utility analysis of endoscopic surveillance of patients with gastric premalignant conditions. Helicobacter 2014; 19: 425-436
  • 5 Marques-Silva L, Areia M, Elvas L. et al. Prevalence of gastric precancerous conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 378-387
  • 6 Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26: 11-22
  • 7 Faigel DO, Eisen GM, Baron TH. et al. Preparation of patients for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 446-450
  • 8 Asl SM, Sivandzadeh GR. Efficacy of premedication with activated Dimethicone or N-acetylcysteine in improving visibility during upper endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4213-4217
  • 9 Chen MJ, Wang HY, Chang CW. et al. The add-on N-acetylcysteine is more effective than dimethicone alone to eliminate mucus during narrow-band imaging endoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 241-245
  • 10 Bhandari P, Green S, Hamanaka H. et al. Use of Gascon and Pronase either as a pre-endoscopic drink or as targeted endoscopic flushes to improve visibility during gastroscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 357-361
  • 11 Ahsan M, Babaei L, Gholamrezaei A. et al. Simethicone for the preparation before esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 484532
  • 12 Bertoni G, Gumina C, Conigliaro R. et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of oral liquid simethicone prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 268-270
  • 13 Keeratichananont S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Kitiyakara T. et al. The role of liquid simethicone in enhancing endoscopic visibility prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD): a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2010; 93: 892-897
  • 14 Kuo CH, Sheu BS, Kao AW. et al. A defoaming agent should be used with pronase premedication to improve visibility in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 531-534
  • 15 Lee GJ, Park SJ, Kim SJ. et al. Effectiveness of premedication with Pronase for visualization of the mucosa during endoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 161-164
  • 16 Fujii T, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. et al. Effectiveness of premedication with pronase for improving visibility during gastroendoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 382-387
  • 17 Zala G, Flury R, Wust J. et al. [Omeprazole/amoxicillin: improved eradication of Helicobacter pylori in smokers because of N-acetylcysteine]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1994; 124: 1391-1397
  • 18 Chang CC, Chen SH, Lin CP. et al. Premedication with pronase or N-acetylcysteine improves visibility during gastroendoscopy: an endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 444-447
  • 19 Chang WK, Yeh MK, Hsu HC. et al. Efficacy of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine as premedication in improving visibility during upper endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 769-774
  • 20 McNally PR, Maydonovitch CL, Wong RK. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 255-258
  • 21 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF. et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869
  • 22 Areia M, Soares M, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 138-147
  • 23 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310