Int J Sports Med 2017; 38(03): 201-209
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119029
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Relative Age, Maturation and Physical Biases on Position Allocation in Elite-Youth Soccer

Chris Towlson
1  Sport, Health and Exercise Science, The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Stephen Cobley
2  Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
,
Adrian Wayne Midgley
3  Sport and Physical Activity, Edgehill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Andrew Garrett
1  Sport, Health and Exercise Science, The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Guy Parkin
4  Pro Football Support, Huddersfield, Yorkshire, United Kingdom
,
Ric Lovell
5  School of Science and Health, Sport and Exercise Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 03 October 2016

Publication Date:
20 February 2017 (eFirst)

Abstract

This study assessed the contribution of relative age, anthropometry, maturation, and physical fitness characteristics on soccer playing position (goalkeeper [GK], central-defender [CD], lateral-defender [LD], central-midfield [CM], lateral-midfielder [LM], and forward [FWD]) for 465 elite-youth players (U13–U18’s). U13–14 CD were relatively older than LD and CM (likely small effects). CD and GK were generally taller and heavier (likely small to very-likely moderate effects) than other players at each developmental stage and were advanced maturers at U13–14 (very-likely small to likely moderate effects). GK had inferior agility (very-likely small to likely moderate effects), endurance (very-likely small to likely moderate effects), and sprint capacities (likely small-moderate effects) vs. outfield positions at U13–14, but deficits in anaerobic phenotypes were diminished in U15–16 and U17–18. Position specific fitness characteristics were distinguished at U15–16 (likely small) and U17–18 (likely moderate), where LM were faster than their central counterparts. In summary, relative age, maturation and anthropometric characteristics appear to bias the allocation of players into key defensive roles from an early development stage, whereas position-specific physical attributes do not become apparent until the latter stages of talent development in outfield players. Given the inter-individual trajectories of physical development according to biological maturation, playing position allocation might be considered ‘plastic’ by selectors, until complete-maturity is achieved.