Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00023071.xml
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(12): 1308-1309
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116545
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116545
Comment
GebFra Science
Reply to “Response to: Dittrich et al.: Non-Embryo-Destructive Extraction of Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells – Overlooked Legal Prohibitions, Professional Legal Consequences and Inconsistencies in Patent Law”
Antwort auf die „Replik zu: Dittrich et al.: Embryonenerhaltende Gewinnung pluripotenter Stammzellen – übersehene strafrechtliche Verbote, berufsrechtliche Konsequenzen und patentrechtliche Inkonsequenzen“Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
21 December 2016 (online)
In the spirit of productive scientific discussion we would like to start by thanking Faltus and Storz [1] for their comments.
-
References
- 1 Faltus T, Storz U. Response to: Dittrich et al.: Non-embryo-destructive extraction of pluripotent embryonic stem cells – overlooked legal prohibitions, professional legal consequences and inconsistencies in patent law. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2016; 76: 1302-1307