Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(12): 1325-1329
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116493
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria

Inzidentelle (prophylaktische) Salpingektomie im Rahmen benigner gynäkologischer Eingriffe oder eines Kaiserschnitts: eine Umfrage zur klinischen Praxis in Österreich
F. L. Potz
1   Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
G. Tomasch
1   Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
S. Polterauer
2   Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
R. Laky
1   Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
C. Marth
3   Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
,
K. Tamussino
1   Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 30 May 2016
revised 29 July 2016

accepted 01 September 2016

Publication Date:
21 December 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction: Most serous ovarian cancers are now thought to originate in the fallopian tubes. This has raised the issue of performing incidental salpingectomy (also called elective, opportunistic, prophylactic or risk-reducing salpingectomy) at the time of benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section. We conducted an online survey to ascertain the policies regarding incidental salpingectomy in Austria in late 2014.

Material and Methods: All 75 departments of obstetrics and gynecology in public hospitals in Austria were surveyed for their policies regarding incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery or cesarean section.

Results: Sixty-six of 75 surveyed departments completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 88 %. Overall, 46 of 66 (70 %) units reported offering or recommending incidental salpingectomy at benign gynecologic surgery, 12 units (18 %) did not, and eight units (12 %) did not have a consistent policy. Salpingectomy was the preferred method for surgical sterilization, including sterilization at the time of cesarean section (71 % and 64 % of units, respectively).

Conclusions: Incidental (elective, opportunistic, prophylactic, risk-reducing) salpingectomy is now widely offered at benign gynecologic surgery and cesarean section in Austria. Evidence for the role of the fallopian tubes in the origin of serous pelvic cancer has led to changes in clinical practice.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Es wird inzwischen angenommen, dass die meisten serösen Ovarialkarzinome in den Eileitern entstehen. Damit stellt sich die Frage, ob eine inzidentelle (auch elektive, opportunistische, prophylaktische oder risikomindernde) Salpingektomie im Rahmen benigner gynäkologischer Eingriffe oder während einer Sectio caesarea durchgeführt werden sollte. Ende 2014 führten wir eine Online-Umfrage durch, um die diesbezügliche Praxis in Österreich zu ermitteln.

Material und Methoden: Alle 75 Abteilungen für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie in den öffentlichen Krankenhäusern Österreichs wurden nach ihrer Politik bezüglich der inzidentellen Salpingektomie im Rahmen benigner gynäkologischer Eingriffe oder eines Kaiserschnitts befragt.

Ergebnisse: Der Fragebogen wurde von 66 der 75 befragten Abteilungen ausgefüllt, was einer Rücklaufquote von 88 % entspricht. Insgesamt gaben 46 von 66 (70 %) Abteilungen an, dass sie eine inzidentelle Salpingektomie im Rahmen benigner gynäkologischer Eingriffe anbieten oder empfehlen. In 12 Abteilungen (18 %) wurde sie nicht angeboten, und bei 8 Abteilungen (12 %) gab es diesbezüglich keine einheitliche Politik. Die Salpingektomie ist die bevorzugte Methode der chirurgischen Sterilisation, auch bei Sterilisationen, die im Rahmen der Sectio caesarea durchgeführt werden (71 bzw. 64 % der Abteilungen).

Schlussfolgerung: Die inzidentelle (elektive, opportunistische, prophylaktische, risikomindernde) Salpingektomie im Rahmen benigner gynäkologischer Eingriffe oder eines Kaiserschnitts wird inzwischen in der Mehrzahl öffentlicher Krankenhäuser in Österreich angeboten. Der Nachweis über die Involvierung der Eileiter bei der Entstehung seröser Beckenkarzinome hat eine Änderung der klinischen Praxis bewirkt.

Key words

ovarian cancer - prophylactic salpingectomy - incidental salpingectomy - risk-reducing salpingectomy

Schlüsselwörter

Ovarialkarzinom - prophylaktische Salpingektomie - inzidentelle Salpingektomie - risikomindernde Salpingektomie
 

  • References

  • 1 Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC et al. Ovarian cancer. Lancet 2014; 384: 1376-1388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 – a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 23-34
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 945-956
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer—shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol 2011; 42: 918-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP et al. Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed Fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer. J Pathol 2001; 195: 451-456
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vang R, Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms. Histopathology 2013; 62: 44-58
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Crum CP, Drapkin R, Kindelberger D et al. Lessons from BRCA: the tubal fimbria emerges as an origin for pelvic serous cancer. Clin Med Res 2007; 5: 35-44
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded. Am J Pathol 2016; 186: 733-747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Májek O et al. Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 55-67
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gaitskell K, Coffey K, Green J et al. Tubal ligation and incidence of 26 site-specific cancers in the Million Women Study. Br J Cancer 2016; 114: 1033-1037
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Falconer H, Yin L, Grönberg H et al. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju410.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Dietl J, Wischhusen J, Häusler SFM. The post-reproductive Fallopian tube: better removed?. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 2918-2924
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McAlpine JN, Hanley GE, Woo MM et al. Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 471.e1-471.e11
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Society of Gynecologic Oncology. SGO Clinical Practice Statement: Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention. Online: https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/guidelines/sgo-clinical-practice-statement-salpingectomy-for-ovarian-cancer-prevention/ last access: 01.10.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. The distal fallopian tube as the origin of non-uterine pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Scientific Impact Paper No 44. 11/2014 Online: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip44hgscs.pdf; last access: 01.10.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Siddle N, Sarrel P, Whitehead M. The effect of hysterectomy on the age at ovarian failure: identification of a subgroup of women with premature loss of ovarian function and literature review. Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 94-100
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Austrian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (OEGGG). Position paper: Elective salpingectomy for the prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer [German]. Online: http://www.oeggg.at/downloads/Leitlinien/Stellungnahme_Salpingektomie_011015.pdf last access: 01.10.2016
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Guldberg R, Wehberg S, Skovlund CW et al. Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977–2010. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002845
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gill SE, Mills BB. Physician opinions regarding elective bilateral salpingectomy with hysterectomy and for sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 517-521
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mikhail E, Salemi JL, Mogos MF et al. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998–2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 713.e1-713.e13
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Garcia C, Martin M, Tucker LY et al. Experience with opportunistic salpingectomy in a large, community-based health system in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: 277-283
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kamran MW, Vaughan D, Crosby D et al. Opportunistic and interventional salpingectomy in women at risk: a strategy for preventing pelvic serous cancer (PSC). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 251-254
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Reade CJ, Finlayson S, McAlpine J et al. Risk-reducing salpingectomy in Cananda: a survey of obstetrician-gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 627-634
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Venturella R, Rocca M, Lico D et al. Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancers: What is happening in Italy?. Eur J Cancer Prev 2016; 25: 410-415
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chene G, de Rochambeau B, Le Bail-Carval K et al. [Current surgical practice of prophylactic and opportunistic salpingectomy in France]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2016; 44: 377-384
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Neis KJ, Zubke W, Römer T et al. Indication and route of hysterectomy for benign diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2016; 76: 350-364
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wagner U, Harter P, Hilpert F et al. S3-Guideline on diagnostics, therapy and follow-up of malignant ovarian tumors. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 874-889
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pölcher M, Hauptmann S, Fotopoulou C et al. Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 231-234
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Moorman PG, Myers ER, Schildkraut JM et al. Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1271-1279
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Findley AD, Siedhoff MT, Hobbs KA et al. Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 1704-1708
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dar P, Sachs GS, Strassburger D et al. Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 142-144
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar