Rofo 2017; 189(01): 57-62
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-116241
Musculoskeletal System
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Memory Effect of the Median Nerve: Can Ultrasound Reliably Depict Carpal Tunnel Release Success?

Memory Effect des Nervus medianus: Kann man ein erfolgreiches Outcome der Karpaltunnelchirurgie bildgebend darstellen?
Fabian Steinkohl
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Leonhard Gruber
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Hannes Gruber
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Wolfgang Löscher
2   Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Bernhard Glodny
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Petra Pülzl
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Eva-Maria Baur
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
,
Alexander Loizides
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 May 2016

19 August 2016

Publication Date:
19 September 2016 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether ultrasound findings of the median nerve cross-section area (CSA) and wrist-to-forearm ratio (WFR) correlate with neurophysiological and patient-reported outcome after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Materials and Methods Subjective pain, CSA, WFR, postoperative scar tissue formation and nerve conduction velocity in 21 hands of 20 patients with clinically confirmed CTS were examined before and after carpal tunnel release surgery. Group differences were compared via a 2-sided ratio paired t-test or one-way ANOVA, and correlations were calculated using a linear regression model.

Results There were no significant pre- and postoperative changes of the CSA of the median nerve (p = 0.293, 95 % CI 0.826 – 1.063) or WFR (p = 0.230, 95 % CI 0.757 – 1.074). The nerve conduction velocity (p < 0.0001, 95 % CI 0.753 – 0.886) and subjective pain during rest (p = 0.001, 95 % CI 1.615 – 5.797) and exercise (p = 0.008, 95 % CI 0.760 – 4.888) improved significantly, though. There was no correlation between changes in the median nerve CSA and nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.357, r = 0.217, R2 = 0.047) or reported pain intensity (p = 0.441, r = 0.200, R2 = 0.040).

Conclusion Contrary to common assumptions, there is no significant reduction of the CSA of the median nerve after successful carpal tunnel release. Morphologic median nerve changes may persist for a longer period regardless of successful surgery and clinical improvement. Accordingly, ultrasound appears unsuitable as the primary means of assessing surgical success due to this “memory effect”.

Key Points

  • CSA of the median nerve does not change significantly after successful carpal tunnel release.

  • Morphologic median nerve alterations may persist regardless of functional outcome (“memory effect”).

  • Therefore, ultrasound imaging is not ideally suited to assess the outcome after carpal tunnel release.

Citation Format

  • Steinkohl Fabian, Gruber Leonhard, Gruber Hannes et al. Memory Effect of the Median Nerve: Can Ultrasound Reliably Depict Carpal Tunnel Release Success?. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 57 – 62

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Evaluierung der postoperativen Ultraschalluntersuchung der Querschnittsfläche und Wrist-to-Forearm-Ratio des Nervus medianus zur Prognoseabschätzung nach Karpaltunnelspaltung bei Karpaltunnelsyndrom.

Material und Methoden 21 Hände von 20 Patienten mit klinisch diagnostiziertem Karpaltunnelsyndrom wurden in Bezug auf subjektive Schmerzen, Querschnittsfläche und Wrist-Forearm-Ratio des N. medianus, postoperatives Narbengewebe kurz vor der Karpaltunnelspaltung und 6 Monate danach untersucht. Gruppenunterschiede wurden mittels eines zweiseitigen ratio-paired t-Tests und one-way ANOVA, Korrelationen mittels eines linearen Regressionsmodells untersucht.

Ergebnisse Es kam zu keiner signifikanten Änderung zwischen präoperativer und postoperativer Querschnittsfläche des Nervus medianus (p = 0,293, 95 % CI 0,826 – 1,063) oder WFR (p = 0,230, 95 % CI 0,757 – 1,074). Die Nervenleitgeschwindigkeit besserte sich nach der Karpaltunnelspaltung signifikant (p < 0,0001, 95 % CI 0,753 – 0,886), ebenso das subjektive Schmerzempfinden in Ruhe (p = 0,001, 95 % CI 1,615 – 5,797) und bei Bewegung (p = 0,008, 95 % CI 0,760 – 4,888). Es bestand keine statistische Korrelation zwischen Änderung der Medianus-Querschnittsfläche und Nervenleitgeschwindigkeit (p = 0,357, r = 0,217, R2 = 0,047) oder karpaltunneltypischer Beschwerden (p = 0,441, r = 0,200, R2 = 0,040).

Schlussfolgerungen Anders als oft angegeben, kommt es nach einer erfolgreichen Karpaltunnelspaltung nicht zu einer signifikanten Reduktion der Querschnittsfläche der Nervus medianus. Ein einmal geschädigter Nervus medianus bleibt auch längere Zeit nach Behebung der Ursache der Kompression verdickt. Aufgrund dieses „Memory Effects“ ist die Annahme, dass ein postoperativ verdickter Nervus medianus mit einer erfolglosen Karpaltunnelspaltung einhergeht, nicht korrekt.

Kernaussagen

  • Die CSA des Nervus medianus ändert sich nicht signifikant nach erfolgreicher Karpaltunnelchirurgie.

  • Morphologische Veränderungen des N. medianus können ungeachtet des funktionellen Outcomes persistieren ("Memory Effect").

  • Aus diesem Grund eignet sich die Ultraschalluntersuchung nicht, um ein erfolgreiches funktionelles Outcome nach operativer Entlastung des Nervus medianus zu beurteilen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Latinovic R. Gulliford MC. Hughes RA. Incidence of common compressive neuropathies in primary care. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 2006; 77: 263-265
  • 2 Aboonq MS. Pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurosciences 2015; 20: 4-9
  • 3 Wong SM. Griffith JF. Hui AC. et al. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis and rheumatism 2002; 46: 1914-1921
  • 4 Sugimoto H. Miyaji N. Ohsawa T. Carpal tunnel syndrome: evaluation of median nerve circulation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 190: 459-466
  • 5 Buchberger W. Schon G. Strasser K. et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 1991; 10: 531-537
  • 6 Hammer HB. Hovden IA. Haavardsholm EA. et al. Ultrasonography shows increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology 2006; 45: 584-588
  • 7 Walker FO. Cartwright MS. Wiesler ER. et al. Ultrasound of nerve and muscle. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2004; 115: 495-507
  • 8 Werner RA. Jacobson JA. Jamadar DA. Influence of body mass index on median nerve function, carpal canal pressure, and cross-sectional area of the median nerve. Muscle & nerve 2004; 30: 481-485
  • 9 Beekman R. Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle & nerve 2003; 27: 26-33
  • 10 Smidt MH. Visser LH. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical and sonographic follow-up after surgery. Muscle & nerve 2008; 38: 987-991
  • 11 Campagna R. Pessis E. Feydy A. et al. MRI assessment of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome after open surgical release of the median nerve. American journal of roentgenology 2009; 193: 644-650
  • 12 Mhoon JT. Juel VC. Hobson-Webb LD. Median nerve ultrasound as a screening tool in carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation of cross-sectional area measures with electrodiagnostic abnormality. Muscle & nerve 2012; 46: 871-878
  • 13 Peer S. Gruber H. Loizides A. Sonography of carpal tunnel syndrome: why, when and how. Imaging in Medicine 2012; 4: 287-297
  • 14 Yoshii Y. Ishii T. Tung WL. Ultrasound assessment of the effectiveness of carpal tunnel release on median nerve deformation. Journal of orthopaedic research: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2015; 33: 726-730
  • 15 Mondelli M. Filippou G. Aretini A. et al. Ultrasonography before and after surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome and relationship with clinical and electrophysiological findings. A new outcome predictor?. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology 2008; 37: 219-224
  • 16 Abicalaf CA. de Barros N. Sernik RA. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome before and after endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament. Clinical radiology 2007; 62: 891-894 ; discussion 895–896
  • 17 Colak A. Kutlay M. Pekkafali Z. et al. Use of sonography in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery. A prospective study. Neurologia medico-chirurgica 2007; 47: 109-115 ; discussion 115
  • 18 Naranjo A. Ojeda S. Rua-Figueroa I. et al. Limited value of ultrasound assessment in patients with poor outcome after carpal tunnel release surgery. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology 2010; 39: 409-412
  • 19 Karabay N. Kayalar M. Ada S. Sonographic assessment of transverse carpal ligament after open surgical release of the carpal tunnel. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 2013; 47: 73-78
  • 20 Vogelin E. Nuesch E. Juni P. et al. Sonographic follow-up of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome undergoing surgical or nonsurgical treatment: prospective cohort study. The Journal of hand surgery 2010; 35: 1401-1409
  • 21 Lee CH. Kim TK. Yoon ES. et al. Postoperative morphologic analysis of carpal tunnel syndrome using high-resolution ultrasonography. Annals of plastic surgery 2005; 54: 143-146