Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2016; 84(10): 633-639
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-115843
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das revidierte Kölner Apraxie-Screening (KAS-R) als diagnostisches Verfahren für Patienten mit rechtshemisphärischem Schlaganfall

A New Diagnostic Tool for Apraxia in Patients with Right-Hemisphere Stroke: The Revised Cologne Apraxia Screening (KAS-R)
K. Wirth   *
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
2   Kognitive Neurowissenschaften, Institut für Neurowissenschaft und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
,
A. Held   *
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
,
E. Kalbe
3   Medizinische Psychologie/Neuropsychologie & Gender Studies, Center für Neuropsychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (CeNDI), Uniklinik Köln
,
J. Kessler
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
,
J. Saliger
4   Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Godeshöhe, Bonn
,
H. Karbe
4   Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Godeshöhe, Bonn
,
G. R. Fink
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
2   Kognitive Neurowissenschaften, Institut für Neurowissenschaft und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
,
P. H. Weiss
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
2   Kognitive Neurowissenschaften, Institut für Neurowissenschaft und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 October 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Das Kölner Apraxie-Screening (KAS) erfasst apraktische Defizite nach linkshemisphärischen Schlaganfällen. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, durch Anpassungen des Testmaterials des KAS und psychometrische Analysen ein diagnostisches Verfahren für Patienten mit rechtshemisphärischem Schlaganfall zu entwickeln. Mittels Itemanalysen von Daten 77 gesunder Probanden und 100 rechtshemisphärischer Schlaganfallpatienten wurden 8 KAS-Items ausgeschlossen. Das somit noch aus 12 Items bestehende KAS-R weist eine gute interne Konsistenz (α = 0,795) sowie eine hohe Sensitivität (79,4 %) und Spezifität (84,4 %) auf. Bei einem Cut-off-Wert von ≤ 46 (von 48) Punkten zeigen 39 der 100 Schlaganfallpatienten eine Apraxie. Dabei korreliert das KAS-R – im Sinne einer guten Konstruktvalidität – signifikant mit den externen Validierungsverfahren. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das KAS-R ein reliables und valides diagnostisches Verfahren für apraktische Defizite nach rechtshemisphärischem Schlaganfall ist.

Abstract

The Cologne Apraxia Screening (KAS) was developed to diagnose apraxia following left-hemisphere (LH) stroke. The present study aims at developing a diagnostic tool for patients with right-hemisphere (RH) stroke (KAS-R) by modifying the test material of the KAS and reducing the test items based on psychometric analyses.

A total of 100 patients with RH stroke and 77 healthy control participants were tested. Psychometric analyses led to the exclusion of 8 KAS items. The final KAS-R, consisting of 12 items, shows good internal consistency (α = 0.795) as well as high sensitivity (79.4 %) and specificity (84.4 %). Applying a cut-off value of ≤ 46 (out of 48) points, 39 RH stroke patients were diagnosed with apraxia. Significant correlations were found between the KAS-R and an imitation test as well as expert ratings, indicating high construct validity. The results suggest that the KAS-R is a reliable and valid diagnostic tool for apraxic deficits after RH stroke.

Schlüsselwörter

Apraxie - Aphasie - Schlaganfall - Kölner Apraxie-Screening

Key words

apraxia - aphasia - stroke - Cologne apraxia screening

* Beide Autoren trugen gleichermaßen zum Manuskript bei und teilen sich somit die Erstautorenschaft.


 

  • Referenzen

  • 1 Goldenberg G. Apraxien. Fortschritte der Neuropsychologie, ed. A. Thöne-Otto et al. Vol. 10. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Binkofski F, Fink G. Apraxien. Nervenarzt 2005; 76 (04) 493-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sundet K, Finset A, Reinvang I. Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1988; 10 (04) 363-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Civelek GM, Atalay A, Turhan N. Association of ideomotor apraxia with lesion site, etiology, neglect, and functional independence in patients with first ever stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015; 22 (02) 94-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Donkervoort M, Dekker J, Deelman B. The course of apraxia and ADL functioning in left hemisphere stroke patients treated in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 1085-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vanbellingen T, Bohlhalter S. Apraxia in neurorehabilitation: Classification, assessment and treatment. NeuroRehabilitation 2011; 28 (02) 91-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Goldenberg G. Apraxia: the cognitive side of motor control. NY: Oxford University Press; 2013
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alexander MP, Bakerm E, Naeser MA et al. Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical dimensions of ideomotor apraxia. Brain 1992; 115: 87-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cubelli R, Marchetti C, Boscolo G et al. Cognition in action: testing a model of limb apraxia. Brain Cogn 2000; 44 (02) 144-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wada Y, Nakagawa Y, Nishikawa T et al. Role of somatosensory feedback from tools in realizing movements by patients with ideomotor apraxia. Eur Neurol 1999; 41: 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Butler JA. How comparable are tests of apraxia?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002; 16: 389-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dovern A, Fink GR, Weiss PH. Diagnosis and treatment of upper limb apraxia. J Neurol 2012; 259 (07) 1269-1283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Weiss PH, Kalbe E, Kessler J et al. KAS: Kölner Apraxie-Screening. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 14 De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures: a quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol 37: 6-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Flores-Medina Y, Chávez-Oliveros M, Medina LD et al. Brain lateralization of complex movement: neuropsychological evidence from unilateral stroke. Brain Cogn 2014; 84 (01) 164-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kaya K, Unsal-Delialioglu S, Kurt M et al. Evaluation of ideomotor apraxia in patients with stroke: a study of reliability and validity. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 108-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Koski L, Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC. Deconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2002; 15: 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Roy EA, Heath M, Westwood D et al. Task demands and limb apraxia in stroke. Brain Cogn 2000; 44 (02) 253-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Vanbellingen T, Kersten B, Van de Winckel A et al. Comprehensive assessment of gesture production: a new test of upper limb apraxia (TULIA). Eur J Neurol 2010; 17 (01) 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bizzozero I, Costato D, Della Sala S et al. Upper and lower face apraxia: role of the right hemisphere. Brain 2000; 123 (11) 2213-2230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kalbe E, Reinhold N, Kessler J. Kurze Aphasie-Check-Liste (ACL-K). Kerpen: UCB-Pharma GmbH; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin – the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33 (01) 63-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goldenberg G, Munsinger U, Karnath HO. Severity of neglect predicts accuracy of imitation in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47 (13) 2948-2952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Goldenberg G. Matching and imitation of hand and finger postures in patients with damage on the left or right hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 559-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goldenberg G. Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1996; 61: 176-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goldenberg G, Strauss S. Hemisphere asymmetries for imitation of novel gestures. Neurology 2002; 59: 893-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Poizner H, Merians AS, Clark MA et al. Left hemispheric specialization for learned, skilled, and purposeful action. Neuropsychology 1998; 12 (02) 163-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Achilles EI, Fink GR, Fischer MH et al. Effect of meaning on apraxic finger imitation deficits. Neuropsychologia 2016; 82: 74-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kertesz A, Hooper P. Praxis and language: the extent and variety of apraxia in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1982; 20 (03) 275-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gainotti G, Assunata Lemmo MM. Comprehension of symbolic gestures in aphasia. Brain and Language 1976; 3: 451-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar