Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2017; 125(05): 297-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108055
Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Success Rates in a Diabetes Specialist Nurse-Led Education Programme: Re-setting the Glucostat

A. H. Heald
1   The School of Medicine and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester
2   Department of Medicine, Leighton Hospital, Crewe
,
S. G. Anderson
3   Cardiovascular Sciences Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester
,
A. Khan
2   Department of Medicine, Leighton Hospital, Crewe
,
J. Stocker
4   Community Services, East Cheshire Trust, Macclesfield
,
S. Davies
4   Community Services, East Cheshire Trust, Macclesfield
,
K. Bliss
4   Community Services, East Cheshire Trust, Macclesfield
,
M. Livingston
5   Department of Blood Sciences, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall
,
P. Donnelly
6   Salford Royal Hospitals, Salford, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 14 December 2015
first decision14 15 2015

accepted 04 May 2016

Publication Date:
28 October 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background

Analysis of National Diabetes Audit data from 2011–2012 of newly diagnosed people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) found low initial success rates in much of the UK at 20% on initial training, while an unusually high success rate of 75% achieving target HbA1C<58 mmol/mol (< 7.5%) was found in Cheshire (England average=40.8%). We present a review of the approach taken by the Cheshire Diabetes team in the 12 months following diagnosis.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2013, 15 consecutive newly diagnosed people with type 1 DM were followed up for 18 months. All received support and advice by community Diabetes Specialist Nurses (DSNs) and Dieticians covering Central and Eastern Cheshire, UK.

Results

Mean±SD age at diagnosis was 23±3 years. The period of contact with the DSN service varied from 7–12 weeks. Baseline HbA1C of 99 mmol/mol [11.2%] (95% CI: 86–111 mmol/mol [10.0–12.3%]) declined by ~50% to 49 mmol/mol [6.6%] (41–57 mmol/mol [5.9–7.4%]; F=16.9, p<0.001) at 6 months and did not change between 6–12 months. Of those newly diagnosed with type 1 DM, 84.6% achieved a target HbA1C<58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) and 61.5% met a target<48 mmol/mol (<6.5%). There was no significant weight change during the study.

Conclusions

The key elements of this bio-psycho-social approach by the DSN team included providing psychological support, patient engagement, demonstrating positive regard, gaining trust, identifying health-seeking behaviour, providing key decision-making skills and developing a self-management plan. This resulted in improvements in overall glycaemic control well above the national average without untoward weight gain.

Summary

The UK National Diabetes Audit (2011–2012) in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetics in Cheshire, UK, showed a success rate at 6 months post-diagnosis of 75% achieving a target HbA1C<58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) compared with the national average of 40.8%. Initially thought to be erroneous, these excellent results were confirmed. The approach taken to achieve them is herein described.

 
  • References

  • 1 Department of Health . National Service Framework for Diabetes: Delivery Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2003
  • 2 Jaiveer P, Jaiveer S, Jujjavarapu S. et al. Improvements in clinical diabetes care in the first year of the new General Medical Services contract in the UK. Br J Diab Vasc Dis 2006; 6: 45-48
  • 3 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline (NG17) published: 26 August 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng17/resources/type-1-diabetes-in-adults-diagnosis-and-management-1837276469701 Last accessed: 06/12/2015
  • 4 The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986
  • 5 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 (Suppl. 01) S11-S61
  • 6 Cooke D, Bond R, Lawton J. et al., for the UK NIHR DAFNE Study Group. Structured type 1 diabetes education delivered within routine care: impact on glycemic control and diabetes-specific quality of life. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 270-272
  • 7 Orchard T, Nathan D, Zinman B. et al. Association Between 7 Years of Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes and Long-term Mortality. JAMA 2015; 313: 45
  • 8 National Diabetes Audit 2012–2013 Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (2014). http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB14970/nati-diab-audi- 12-13-care-proc-rep.pdf Last accessed: 06/12/2015
  • 9 National Diabetes Audit 2011–2012 Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets – NHS Eastern Cheshire CCG. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (2013). http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB12258/nda-audi-ccg-eng-eche-11-12-rep1.pdf Last accessed: 06/12/2015
  • 10 World Health Organization. Health Care for Chronic Conditions Team. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action: global report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002. http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/iccc_exec_summary_eng.pdf Last accessed: 06/12/2015
  • 11 The Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: (DAFNE) randomised, controlled trial. BMJ 2002; 325: 746
  • 12 Glasgow RE, Funnell MM, Bonomi AE. et al. Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24: 80-87