Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(06): E631-E636
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106961
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Development of a predictive model of Crohn’s disease proximal small bowel involvement in capsule endoscopy evaluation

Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto*
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Helder Cardoso*
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Bruno Rosa
2   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
,
João Santos-Antunes
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Susana Rodrigues
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Margarida Marques
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Susana Lopes
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Andreia Albuquerque
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
,
Pedro Carvalho
2   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
,
Maria Moreira
2   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
,
José Cotter
2   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
,
Guilherme Macedo
1   Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 05 November 2015

accepted after revision: 11 April 2016

Publication Date:
12 May 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: One of the indications for capsule endoscopy (CE) is the detection of proximal small bowel (SB) involvement in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Our aim was to assess clinical, laboratory and endoscopic predictors associated with proximal SB involvement in CD patients submitted to CE.

Patients and methods: Retrospective multicenter study in which Lewis score (LS) was systematically determined in 190 CE of patients diagnosed with CD between 2003 and 2014.

Results: Significant inflammatory activity (LS > 135) was present in 23 % of the patients in the first tertile and in 31 % of the patients in the second tertile. Albumin, haemoglobin, and total proteins were significantly lower in patients with a LS > 790 compared to patients with a LS < 135, while white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein were significantly higher. In the univariable analysis, a higher risk for proximal SB involvement at CE was associated with ileal involvement at ileocolonoscopy (OR 2.858, P = 0.006), higher platelets levels (OR 1.005, P = 0.004) and significant weight loss (OR 2.450, P = 0.006). In logistic regression, ileal involvement at ileocolonoscopy (OR 6.817, P = 0.003), stricturing behavior (OR 8.653, P = 0.011) and significant weight loss (OR 3.629, P = 0.028) were independently associated with proximal SB involvement at CE. Considering the ROC curve of this model, a cut-off > 0.249 predicts proximal SB involvement with 90 % sensitivity and 40 % specificity (AUROC 0.732).

Conclusions: One-third of patients had proximal SB involvement. Predictive factors were significant weight loss, stricturing behaviour, and ileal involvement at ileocolonoscopy. These data help to select CD patients that benefit the most from performing a CE.

* These authors contributed equally.


 
  • References

  • 1 Annese V, Daperno M, Rutter MD et al. European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7: 982-1018
  • 2 Gower-Rousseau C, Vasseur F, Fumery M et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases: new insights from a French population-based registry (EPIMAD). Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 89-94
  • 3 Nuij VJ, Zelinkova Z, Rijk MC et al. Dutch Delta IBD Group. Phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease at diagnosis in the Netherlands: a population-based inception cohort study (the Delta Cohort). Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 2215-2222
  • 4 Stuart S, Conner T, Ahmed A et al. The smaller bowel: imaging the small bowel in paediatric Crohn's disease. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 288-297
  • 5 Di Nardo G, Aloi M, Oliva S et al. Investigation of small bowel in pediatric Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 1760-1776
  • 6 Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH et al. New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1795-1806
  • 7 Leighton JA, Legnani P, Seidman EG. Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: where we are and where we are going. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13: 331-337
  • 8 Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R et al. Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 595-604
  • 9 Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 954-964
  • 10 Dionisio PM, Gurudu SR, Leighton JA et al. Capsule endoscopy has a significantly higher diagnostic yield in patients with suspected and established small-bowel Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1240-1248; quiz 1249
  • 11 Solem CA, Loftus Jr EV, Fletcher JG et al. Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 255-266
  • 12 Gralnek IM, Defranchis R, Seidman E et al. Development of a capsule endoscopy scoring index for small bowel mucosal inflammatory change. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 146-154
  • 13 Korman LY. Standard terminology for capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2004; 14: 33-41
  • 14 Korman LY, Delvaux M, Gay G et al. Capsule endoscopy structured terminology (CEST): proposal of a standardized and structured terminology for reporting capsule endoscopy procedures. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 951-959
  • 15 Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO et al. European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Current management. J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4: 28-62
  • 16 Valle J, Alcántara M, Pérez-Grueso MJ et al. Clinical features of patients with negative results from traditional diagnostic work-up and Crohn's disease findings from capsule endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 692-696
  • 17 Herrerías JM, Caunedo A, Rodríguez-Téllez M et al. Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative endoscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 564-568
  • 18 Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E et al. Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut 2003; 52: 390-392
  • 19 Girelli CM, Porta P, Malacrida V et al. Clinical outcome of patients examined by capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel Crohn's disease. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 148-154
  • 20 Fireman Z, Eliakim R, Adler S et al. Capsule endoscopy in real life: a four-centre experience of 160 consecutive patients in Israel. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 927-931
  • 21 Sidhu R, Brunt LK, Morley SR et al. Undisclosed use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may underlie small-bowel injury observed by capsule endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 992-995
  • 22 Bourreille A, Ignjatovic A, Aabakken L et al. World Organisation of Digestive Endoscopy (OMED) and the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). Role of small-bowel endoscopy in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an international OMED-ECCO consensus . Endoscopy 2009; 41: 618-637
  • 23 Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 671-676
  • 24 Chen X, Ran ZH, Tong JL. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with small bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 4372-4378
  • 25 Crook DW, Knuesel PR, Froehlich JM et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance enterography and video capsule endoscopy in evaluating small bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 54-65
  • 26 Tillack C, Seiderer J, Brand S et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14: 1219-1928
  • 27 Petruzziello C, Onali S, Calabrese E et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy and proximal small bowel lesions in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3299-3304
  • 28 Lazarev M, Huang C, Bitton A et al. Relationship between proximal Crohn's disease location and disease behavior and surgery: a cross-sectional study of the IBD Genetics Consortium. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 106-112
  • 29 Flamant M, Trang C, Maillard O et al. The prevalence and outcome of jejunal lesions visualized by small bowel capsule endoscopy in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1390-1396
  • 30 Lewis BS. Expanding role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4137-4141