Download PDF
Ultrasound Int Open 2016; 02(03): E93-E97
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106396
Technical Development
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Easy Pulsatile Phantom for Teaching and Validation of Flow Measurements in Ultrasound

M. B. Rominger
1   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, UniversitätsSpital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
,
E.-M. Müller-Stuler
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
M. Pinto
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
A. S. Becker
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
K. Martini
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
T. Frauenfelder
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
V. Klingmüller
2   Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 10 August 2015

accepted 28 March 2016

Publication Date:
13 July 2016 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose:

To build a simple model to teach and validate non-pulsatile and pulsatile flow quantification in ultrasound.

Materials and Methods:

The setting consists of the following connected components: (1) medical syringe pump producing an adjustable constant flow (ml/min), (2) modulator modifying constant flow to a reproducible pulsatile flow, (3) water tank containing a diagonal running silicone tube (0.5 mm inner diameter), and (4) a fixated ultrasound probe (L9 Linear Array 9 MHz, GE Logiq E9) measuring the flow inside the tube. Commercially available microbubbles suspended with physiological saline solution were used for ultrasonic visibility. Spectral Doppler of different flow profiles is performed.

Results:

The syringe pump produces an adjustable, constant flow and serves as the reference standard. The filling volume of the tube system is 1.2 ml. Microbubbles are very well detected by ultrasound and can be used as an easy and clean blood mimicking substance. The modulator generates different physiological and pathological flow profiles. Velocities are similar to those found within human blood vessels. Thus, it is possible to train and validate flow measurements in ultrasound.

Conclusion:

The model produces non-pulsatile and various pulsatile flow profiles and allows validation of flow measurements. The compact size permits easy and economic setup for flow measurements in research, skills lab and continuing education.

Key words

education - ultrasound - blood vessels - ultrasound spectral doppler - ultrasound color doppler
 

  • References

  • 1 Müller-Stüler E. Mathematical Analysis of Doppler signal for quantitative assessment of blood flow Mathematische Analyse des Dopplersignals zur quantitativen Bestimmung des Blutflusses. Diss. Aachen: Shaker Verlag; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hoskins PR. Simulation and validation of arterial ultrasound imaging and blood flow. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2008; 34: 693-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 King DM, Moran CM, McNamara JD et al. Development of a vessel-mimicking material for use in anatomically realistic Doppler flow phantoms. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2011; 37: 813-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Browne JE. A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices. Phys Med 2014; 30: 742-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Menke M. [Flow assessment trough contineous intensity measurement of back-scatter echos in a phantom modell] Volumenflussbestimmung durch kontinuierliche Intensitätsmessung der Rückstreuechos in einem Flussphantom. Diss. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 2012; http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDISS_derivate_000000011412 /Dissertation_Mareile_Menke_2.Onlineversion.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Browne JE, Ramnarine KV, Watson AJ et al. Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2003; 29: 1053-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dong F, Madsen EL, MacDonald MC et al. Nonlinearity parameter for tissue-mimicking materials. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1999; 25: 831-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Madsen EL, Frank GR, Dong F. Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1998; 24: 535-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Uddin S. Multimodal phantom model for evaluation of small vessels Multimodales Phantommodell für die Evaluierung von Stenosen in kleinen Gefässen, Diss. University Giessen. 2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Oates CP. Towards an ideal blood analogue for Doppler ultrasound phantoms. Physics in medicine and biology 1991; 36: 1433-1442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ramnarine KV, Hoskins PR, Routh HF et al. Doppler backscatter properties of a blood-mimicking fluid for Doppler performance assessment. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1999; 25: 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ramnarine KV, Nassiri DK, Hoskins PR et al. Validation of a new blood-mimicking fluid for use in Doppler flow test objects. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 1998; 24: 451-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980) 2013; 34: 11-29
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). 2012 33. 33-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tortoli P, Guidi F, Mori R et al. The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies. Medical & biological engineering & computing 2009; 47: 827-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Logallo N, Fromm A, Waje-Andreassen U et al. Effect of microbubble contrast on intracranial blood flow velocity assessed by transcranial Doppler. Journal of ultrasound 2014; 17: 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gorce JM, Arditi M, Schneider M. Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents: a study of SonoVue. Investigative radiology 2000; 35: 661-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar