Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(05): 542-550
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106209
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Toxicity Assessment of a Phase III Study Evaluating FEC-Doc and FEC-Doc Combined with Gemcitabine as an Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: the SUCCESS-A Trial

Toxizitätsbewertung einer Phase-III-Studie von FEC-Doc und FEC-Doc plus Gemcitabin als adjuvante Therapie von Hochrisiko-Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs im Frühstadium: Die SUCCESS-A-Studie
L. Schröder
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
,
B. Rack
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
,
H. Sommer
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
,
J. G. Koch
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
,
T. Weissenbacher
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich
,
W. Janni
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
,
A. Schneeweiss
3   Head of Division Gynecologic Oncology National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg
,
M. Rezai
5   Luisenkrankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
,
R. Lorenz
6   Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. R. Lorenz/N. Hecker, Braunschweig
,
B. Jäger
4   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf
,
A. Schramm
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
,
L. Häberle
7   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
,
P. A. Fasching
7   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
,
T. W. P. Friedl
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
,
M. W. Beckmann
7   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen
,
C. Scholz
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 25 February 2016
revised 07 April 2016

accepted 08 April 2016

Publication Date:
19 May 2016 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: This paper aims to evaluate the toxicity profile of additive gemcitabine to adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in this open-label randomized controlled Phase III study were treated with 3 cycles of epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel with those receiving 3 cycles of FEC followed by 3 cycles of gemcitabine-docetaxel (FEC-DG). 3690 patients were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) toxicity criteria (CTCAE). The study medications were assessed by the occurrence of grade 3–4 adverse events, dose reductions, postponements of treatment cycles and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Results: No differences in neutropenia or febrile neutropenia were demonstrated. However, thrombocytopenia was significantly increased with FEC-DG treatment (2.0 vs. 0.5 %, p < 0.001), as was leukopenia (64.1 vs. 58.5 %, p < 0.001). With FEC-DG significantly more G-CSF support in cycles 4 to 6 (FEC-DG: 57.8 %, FEC-D: 36.3 %, p < 0.001) was provided. Transaminase elevation was significantly more common with FEC-DG (SGPT: 6.3 %, SGOT: 2 %), whereas neuropathy (1.2 %), arthralgia (1.6 %) and bone pain (2.6 %) were more common using FEC-D. Dose reductions > 20 % (4 vs. 2.4 %) and postponement of treatment cycles (0.9 vs. 0.4 %) were significantly more frequent in the FEC-DG arm. Eight deaths occurred during treatment in the FEC-DG arm and four in the FEC-D arm. Conclusion: The addition of gemcitabine increased hematological toxicity and was associated with more dose reductions and postponements of treatment cycles.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Die vorliegende Studie untersucht das Toxizitätsprofil nach der zusätzlichen Gabe von Gemcitabin in Kombination mit einer adjuvanten Taxan-basierten Chemotherapie bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs. Methode: Es handelt sich hier um eine randomisierte kontrollierte Phase-III-Open-Label-Studie. Alle in der Studie aufgenommenen Patientinnen erhielten 3 Zyklen Epirubicin-Fluorouracil-Cyclophosphamid (FEC) gefolgt von 3 Zyklen Docetaxel bzw. 3 Zyklen FEC gefolgt von 3 Zyklen Gemcitabin-Docetaxel (FEC-DG). Die Daten von insgesamt 3690 Patientinnen wurden mittels der Toxizitätskriterien (CTCAE) des nationalen Krebsinstituts der USA (National Cancer Institute [NCI]) ausgewertet. Kriterien für die Auswertung der Studienmedikation waren das Auftreten unerwünschter Ereignisse 3. oder 4. Grades, Dosisreduktionen, Verschiebungen nachfolgender Behandlungszyklen und Granulozytenkolonie-stimulierender Faktor (G-CSF)-Gabe. Ergebnisse: Es zeigten sich keine Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Gruppen hinsichtlich der Entwicklung einer Neutropenie oder einer febrilen Neutropenie. Dagegen war die Thrombozytopenie nach der Behandlung mit FEC-DG signifikant erhöht (2,0 vs. 0,5 %, p < 0,001), und die Leukopenie trat in dieser Gruppe ebenfalls deutlich häufiger auf (64,1 vs. 58,5 %, p < 0,001). Der Einsatz von G-CSF-Präparaten in den Zyklen 4–6 war deutlich höher in der FEC-DG-Gruppe (FEC-DG: 57,8 %, FEC-D: 36,3 %, p < 0,001). Ein Transaminasenanstieg kam wesentlich häufiger in der FEC-DG-Gruppe vor (SGPT: 6,3 %, SGOT: 2 %), während Neuropathien (1,2 %), Arthralgien (1,6 %) und Knochenschmerzen (2,6 %) häufiger in der FEC-D-Gruppe auftraten. Dosisreduktionen > 20 % (4 vs. 2.4 %) sowie eine Verschiebung nachfolgender Behandlungszyklen (0,9 vs. 0,4 %) kamen deutlich häufiger im FEC-DG-Studienarm vor. Während der Behandlung starben 8 Patientinnen im FEC-DG-Studienarm und 4 im FEC-D-Studienarm. Schlussfolgerung: Die zusätzliche Gabe von Gemcitabin hat die hämatologische Toxizität erhöht und war mit mehr Dosisreduktionen und mehr Verschiebungen nachfolgender Behandlungszyklen assoziiert.

Supporting Information

 
  • References

  • 1 Early Breast Cancer Trialistʼs Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005; 365: 1687-1717
  • 2 Andergassen U, Kasprowicz NS, Hepp P et al. Participation in the SUCCESS-A trial improves intensity and quality of care for patients with primary breast cancer. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 63-69
  • 3 Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Katalinic A. Epidemiology of breast cancer – current figures and trends. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 130-135
  • 4 Maass N, Schütz F, Fasching PA et al. Breast cancer update 2014 – focus on the patient and the tumour. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2015; 75: 170-182
  • 5 Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Cabiddu M et al. Mortality, leukemic risk, and cardiovascular toxicity of adjuvant anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 135: 335-346
  • 6 Levine MN, Bramwell VH, Pritchard KI et al. Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2651-2658
  • 7 Mamounas EP, Bryant J, Lembersky B et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3686-3696
  • 8 Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 976-983
  • 9 Hershman DL, Shao T. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity after breast cancer treatment. Oncology (Williston Park) 2009; 23: 227-234
  • 10 Sandström M, Lindman H, Nygren P et al. Model describing the relationship between pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity of the epirubicin-docetaxel regimen in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 413-421
  • 11 Poirier E, Desbiens C, Poirier B et al. Comparison of serious adverse events between the original and a generic docetaxel in breast cancer patients. Ann Pharmacother 2014; 48: 447-455
  • 12 Markman M. Managing taxane toxicities. Support Care Cancer 2003; 11: 144-147
  • 13 Carmichael J, Possinger K, Phillip P et al. Advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial with gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 2731-2736
  • 14 Akrivakis K, Schmid P, Flath B et al. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in stage IV breast cancer: a phase I study. Anticancer Drugs 1999; 10: 525-531
  • 15 OʼShaughnessy J, Schwartzberg LS, Danso MA et al. A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: Abstr. 1007
  • 16 Heinemann V. Gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2004; 5: 37-44
  • 17 Colomer R, Llombart-Cussac A, Tusquets I et al. Biweekly gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in first-line metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and correlation with HER2 extracellular domain. Clin Transl Oncol 2006; 8: 896-902
  • 18 Spielmann M, Llombart-Cussac A, Kalla S et al. Single-agent gemcitabine is active in previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Oncology 2001; 60: 303-307
  • 19 Heinemann V, Stemmler HJ, Wohlrab A et al. High efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with predominantly anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006; 57: 640-646
  • 20 Nagourney RA, Flam M, Link J et al. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine repeating doublet therapy in recurrent breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2008; 8: 432-435
  • 21 Allouache D, Gawande SR, Tubiana-Hulin M et al. First-line therapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel in locally, recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study. BMC Cancer 2005; 5: 151
  • 22 Dranitsaris G, Beegle N, Kalberer T et al. A comparison of toxicity and health care resource use between eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in a community oncology setting. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2015; 21: 170-177
  • 23 Maas KW, van der Lee I, Bolt K et al. Lung function changes and pulmonary complications in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin as part of combined modality treatment. Lung Cancer 2003; 41: 345-351
  • 24 Albain KS, Nag SM, Calderillo-Ruiz G et al. Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3950-3957
  • 25 Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE et al. Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3197-3204
  • 26 Bear HD, Tang G, Rastogi P et al. Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 310-320
  • 27 Fossella FV, Lippman SM, Shin DM et al. Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 310-316
  • 28 Seidman AD, Brufsky A, Ansari RH et al. Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus capecitabine plus docetaxel with planned crossover to the alternate single agent in metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1094-1101
  • 29 Earl HM, Vallier AL, Hiller L et al. Effects of the addition of gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-first sequencing, in neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel for women with high-risk early breast cancer (Neo-tAnGo): an open-label, 2×2 factorial randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 201-212
  • 30 Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielmann M et al. Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS01 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5664-5671
  • 31 Wardley AM, Hiller L, Howard HC et al. tAnGo: a randomised phase III trial of gemcitabine in paclitaxel-containing, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-based, adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a prospective pulmonary, cardiac and hepatic function evaluation. Br J Cancer 2008; 99: 597-603