Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2016; 37(03): 234-251
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104646
Continuing Medical Education
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) of the Kidneys by Using the Bosniak Classification

Kontrastverstärkte Ultraschallbildgebung (CEUS) der Niere unter Verwendung der Bosniak-Klassifikation
J. Rübenthaler
  Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich-Großhadern Campus, Munich, Germany
,
F. Bogner
  Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich-Großhadern Campus, Munich, Germany
,
M. Reiser
  Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich-Großhadern Campus, Munich, Germany
,
D. A. Clevert
  Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich-Großhadern Campus, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 September 2015

08 February 2016

Publication Date:
08 April 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Ultrasound is the most used interdisciplinary non-ionizing imaging technique in clinical routine. Therefore, ultrasound has a special value in the diagnosis and monitoring of cystic renal lesions, which can be classified as non-complicated or complicated and by means of occurrence as solitary or multifocal lesions. The Bosniak classification (I-IV) classifies renal cysts in 5 different categories with the help of ultrasound and computed tomography image criteria and is used for decisions of further clinical treatment. Additionally to normal native B-mode sonography, several new methods are in clinical use to improve diagnostic accuracy of unclear cases. Contrast enhanced ultrasound and MRI/CT are able to find and characterize difficult pathologies. This review explains the most important pathologies of cystic lesions of the kidney and stresses the different imaging methods of native B-mode sonography and the new techniques of contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund der standardmäßigen Verwendung der Sonografie im klinischen Alltag kommt ihr eine entscheidende Bedeutung in der Diagnostik von zystischen Läsionen der Niere zu. Diese werden nach Anzahl, Morphologie und Lokalisation unterteilt. Zur Charakterisierung von zystischen Läsionen hat sich die Bosniak-Klassifikation (I–IV) etabliert, die Zysten in 5 Stufen ursprünglich anhand ihrer bildmorphologischen Eigenschaften in der Computertomografie unterteilt, die sich aber auch in der Sonografie anwenden lassen. Über das weitere therapeutische Vorgehen kann anhand dieser Einteilung entschieden werden. Zur Verfeinerung der nativen B-Bild-sonografischen Diagnose stehen inzwischen sowohl der kontrastmittelverstärkte Ultraschall als auch die MRT/CT zur definitiven Beurteilung zur Verfügung. Sowohl der kontrastmittelverstärkte Ultraschall als auch die MRT/CT ermöglichen das Auffinden und die Charakterisierung von unklaren Befunden. Wegen der Verwendung eines nahezu nebenwirkungsfreien Kontrastmittels, der fehlenden Strahlenbelastung und der Möglichkeit der direkten Durchführung eines kontrastmittelverstärkten Ultraschalls nach initialer B-Bild-Sonografie, sollte dieser primär als weiteres Schnittbildverfahren verwendet werden. Dieses Review erläutert die wichtigsten Pathologien von zystischen Läsionen der Niere und legt dabei das Hauptaugenmerk auf die native B-Bild-Sonografie und die neuen Techniken des kontrastmittelverstärkten Ultraschalls.

 

  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Clevert DA, Bensler S, Stickel M et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound eases interpretation of an unclear renal tumor in addition to CT, MRI and histological findings– a case report in a young patient. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2007; 36: 313-318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Clevert DA, D'Anastasi M, Jung EM. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microcirculation: efficiency through dynamics – current developments. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2013; 53: 171-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Clevert DA, Horng A, Staehler M et al. Diagnostic algorithm in cystic renal masses. Der Urologe Ausg A 2010; 49: 421-431 quiz 32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clevert DA, Jung EM. Interventional sonography of the liver and kidneys. Der Radiologe 2013; 53: 962-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Weckbach S et al. Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2008; 39: 171-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clevert DA, Sterzik A, Braunagel M et al. Modern imaging of kidney tumors. Der Urologe Ausg A 2013; 52: 515-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012; 33: 33-59
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Warren KS, McFarlane J. The Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses. BJU Int 2005; 95: 939-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ravine D, Gibson RN, Donlan J et al. An ultrasound renal cyst prevalence survey: specificity data for inherited renal cystic diseases. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 1993; 22: 803-807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Greis C. Ultrasound contrast agents as markers of vascularity and microcirculation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2009; 43: 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Greis C. Summary of technical principles of contrast sonography and future perspectives. Der Radiologe 2011; 51: 456-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Greis C. Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: tips and tricks. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2014; 58: 89-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Greis C. Technology overview: SonoVue (Bracco, Milan). European radiology 2004; 14: P11-P15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bauer A, Solbiati L, Weissman N. Ultrasound imaging with SonoVue: low mechanical index real-time imaging. Academic radiology 2002; 9: S282-S284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. Italian Society for Ultrasound in M, Biology Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast A. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2006; 32: 1369-1375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 ter Haar G. Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47: 893-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Solivetti FM, Elia F, Musicco F et al. Anaphylactic shock induced by sulphur hexafluoride in an individual with no history of heart disease: case report and literature review. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012; 33: 597-598
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986; 158: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bosniak MA. The use of the Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. The Journal of urology 1997; 157: 1852-1853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. American journal of roentgenology 1997; 169: 819-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bosniak MA. Should we biopsy complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III)?. American journal of roentgenology 2003; 181: 1425-1426 author reply 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bosniak MA. The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later. Radiology 2012; 262: 781-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. American journal of roentgenology 2000; 175: 339-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA et al. CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. American journal of roentgenology 1997; 169: 813-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Radermacher J. Ultrasound of the kidney and renal vessels. I: Normal findings, congenital diseases, diseases of the kidney parenchyma. Der Internist 2003; 44: 1283-1297 quiz 98–99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA. Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 2004; 231: 365-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Humke U et al. Differential diagnosis of focal lesions of the kidney in CT and MRT. Rontgenpraxis 2008; 56: 219-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hindman NM, Hecht EM, Bosniak MA. Follow-up for Bosniak category 2F cystic renal lesions. Radiology 2014; 272: 757-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Graser A, Zech CJ, Stief CG et al. Imaging renal cell carcinoma. Der Urologe Ausg A 2009; 48: 427-436 quiz 37–38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Calcification in cystic renal masses: is it important in diagnosis?. Radiology 2003; 226: 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Smith AD, Remer EM, Cox KL et al. Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions: outcomes and associations. Radiology 2012; 262: 152-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kreft B, Schild HH. Cystic renal lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 892-903
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Onishi T, Oishi Y, Goto H et al. Cyst-associated renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic characteristics and evaluation of prognosis in 27 cases. Int J Urol 2001; 8: 268-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hartman DS, Weatherby 3rd E, Laskin WB et al. Cystic renal cell carcinoma: CT findings simulating a benign hyperdense cyst. American journal of roentgenology 1992; 159: 1235-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Balci NC, Semelka RC, Patt RH et al. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging. American journal of roentgenology 1999; 172: 1495-1500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 350-356
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Greis C et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2014; 35: 108-125 quiz 26–27
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar