Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(07): 779-784
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104282
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Repeat Measurement of Cervical Length in Women with Threatened Preterm Labor

Wiederholung der Zervixlängenmessung in Frauen mit drohender Frühgeburt
P. Wagner
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
J. Sonek
2   Fetal Medicine Foundation USA, Dayton, OH, USA
3   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA
,
M. Heidemeyer
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
M. Schmid
4   Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
H. Abele
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
M. Hoopmann
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
K. O. Kagan
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 10 December 2015
revised 01 March 2016

accepted 02 March 2016

Publication Date:
20 July 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the value of a repeat measurement some days after the first cervical length measurement done at the time of preterm contractions. Study Design: Retrospective study involving women with singleton pregnancies who presented with preterm contractions at 24 to 33 + 6 weeks of gestation. The cervical length was measured at the time of presentation and some days afterwards. Results: The study population consisted of 17 cases with a preterm delivery within 14 days and 288 uneventful pregnancies. Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated a significant correlation between delivery within 14 days and both, the first and second cervical length measurements as well as the difference between the two measurements. Up to a false positive rate of 20 %, ROC curve analysis showed an improved detection rate for preterm delivery by inluding both measurements. At a false positive rate of 10 % – which corresponds to a first and second cervical length of 10 and 9 mm – the detection rate was 17.6 % with the first cervical length measurement, 47.0 % with the second and 52.9 % if the difference between both measurements was added. Conclusion: Our results indicate that in women with symptoms of preterm labor it is worth to repeat the measurement some days later and to take into account the difference between both measurements.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Ziel der Studie war es, bei Patientinnen mit vorzeitiger Wehentätigkeit den Nutzen einer wiederholten Messung der Zervixlänge zu prüfen. Design der Studie: Retrospektive Studie bei Frauen mit Einlingsschwangerschaften, die sich zwischen der 24 + 0 und 33 + 6 SSW wegen vorzeitiger Wehentätigkeit vorstellten. Die Zervixlänge wurde bei der Erstvorstellung sowie einige Tage danach gemessen. Ergebnisse: Untersucht wurden 17 Patientinnen, die innerhalb von 14 Tagen nach Vorstellung vorzeitig entbanden, sowie 288 Frauen mit komplikationslosen Schwangerschaften. Bei der univariaten logistischen Regressionsanalyse zeigte sich eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen vorzeitiger Entbindung innerhalb von 14 Tagen und beiden Zervixlängenmessungen sowie deren Unterschied. Die ROC-Kurvenanalyse wies bis zu einer Falsch-Positiv-Rate von 20 % eine deutlich höhere Detektionsrate für vorzeitige Entbindungen durch die Kombination der Parameter auf. Bei einer Falsch-Positiv-Rate von 10 % – die einer Zervixlänge von jeweils 10 bzw. 9 mm bei der Erst- bzw. Zweitmessung entspricht – lag die Detektionsrate bei der ersten Messung der Zervixlänge bei 17,6 %, bei der Zweitmessung bei 47,0 % und, wenn der Unterschied zwischen den beiden Messwerten mitgerechnet wurde, bei 52,9 %. Schlussfolgerung: Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass es bei Frauen mit vorzeitigen Wehen nützlich sein kann, die Messung der Zervixlänge einige Tage nach der Erstmessung zu wiederholen und auf den Unterschied beider Messwerte zu achten.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 989-994
  • 2 Honest H, Forbes CA, Durée KH et al. Screening to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-627
  • 3 Deshpande SN, van Asselt ADI, Tomini F et al. Rapid fetal fibronectin testing to predict preterm birth in women with symptoms of premature labour: a systematic review and cost analysis. Health Technol Assess 2013; 17: 1-138
  • 4 Tsoi E, Akmal S, Rane S et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 552-555
  • 5 Tsoi E, Akmal S, Geerts L et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 368-372
  • 6 Wulff CB, Ekelund CK, Hedegaard M et al. Can a 15-mm cervical length cutoff discriminate between low and high risk of preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labor?. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 216-223
  • 7 Palacio M, Sanin-Blair J, Sánchez M et al. The use of a variable cut-off value of cervical length in women admitted for preterm labor before and after 32 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 421-426
  • 8 Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K et al. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 554-557
  • 9 Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 358-362
  • 10 Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A et al. Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 54-64
  • 11 Hiersch L, Yogev Y, Domniz N et al. The role of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor: is it a valid predictor at any gestational age?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 532.e1-532.e9
  • 12 To MS, Skentou CA, Royston P et al. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 362-367
  • 13 Iams JD. Cervical length–time to report the rate of change?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 443
  • 14 Naim A, Haberman S, Burgess T et al. Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 887-889
  • 15 Sotiriadis A, Kavvadias A, Papatheodorou S et al. The value of serial cervical length measurements for the prediction of threatened preterm labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 148: 17-20
  • 16 Moroz LA, Simhan HN. Rate of sonographic cervical shortening and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 234.e1-234.e5
  • 17 Kagan KO, To M, Tsoi E et al. Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length. BJOG 2006; 113 (Suppl. 03) 52-56
  • 18 Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Papatsonis DNM et al. Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (6) CD002255
  • 19 Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3) CD004454
  • 20 Bomba-Opon DA, Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Kosinski P et al. Vaginal progesterone after tocolytic therapy in threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 1156-1159
  • 21 Areia A, Fonseca E, Moura P. Progesterone use after successful treatment of threatened pre-term delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 33: 678-681
  • 22 Alfirevic Z, Allen-Coward H, Molina F et al. Targeted therapy for threatened preterm labor based on sonographic measurement of the cervical length: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 47-50
  • 23 Fox NS, Jean-Pierre C, Predanic M et al. Short cervix: is a follow-up measurement useful?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 44-46
  • 24 Rozenberg P, Rudant J, Chevret S et al. Repeat measurement of cervical length after successful tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 995-999