Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(04): E403-E408
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101787
Case report
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Concurrent myotomy and tunneling after establishment of a half tunnel instead of myotomy after establishment of a full tunnel: a more efficient method of peroral endoscopic myotomy

George M. Philips*
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
,
Sunil Dacha*
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
,
Steve A. Keilin
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
,
Field F. Willingham
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
,
Qiang Cai
Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 28 September 2015

accepted after revision: 05 January 2016

Publication Date:
30 March 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a time-consuming and challenging procedure. Traditionally, the myotomy is done after the submucosal tunnel has been completed. Starting the myotomy earlier, after submucosal tunneling is half completed (concurrent myotomy and tunneling), may be more efficient. This study aims to assess if the method of concurrent myotomy and tunneling may decrease the procedural time and be efficacious.

Patients and methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent modified POEM (concurrent myotomy and tunneling) or traditional POEM at a tertiary care medical center. Modified POEM or traditional POEM was performed at the discretion of the endoscopist in patients presenting with achalasia. The total procedural duration, myotomy duration, myotomy length, and time per unit length of myotomy were recorded for both modified and traditional POEM.

Results: Modified POEM was performed in 6 patients whose mean age (± standard deviation [SD]) was 58 ± 13.3 years. Of these, 5 patients had type II achalasia and 1 patient had esophageal dysmotility. The mean Eckardt score (± SD) before the procedure was 8.8 ± 1.3. The modified technique was performed in 47 ± 8 minutes, with 6 ± 1 minutes required per centimeter of myotomy and 3 ± 1 minutes required per centimeter of submucosal space. The Eckardt score was 3 ± 1.1 at 1 month and 3 ± 2.5 at 3 months. The procedure time for modified POEM was significantly shorter than that for traditional POEM.

Conclusions: Modified POEM with short submucosal tunneling may be more efficient than traditional POEM with long submucosal tunneling, and outcomes may be equivalent over short-term follow-up. Long-term data and randomized controlled studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified POEM with that of the traditional method.

* These authors contributed equally to the study.


 
  • References

  • 1 Khashab MA, Saxena P, Kumbhari V et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy as a platform for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 136-139
  • 2 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
  • 3 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764
  • 4 Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Saxena P et al. Jet injection of dyed saline facilitates efficient peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 298-301
  • 5 Cai MY, Zhou PH, Yao LQ et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for idiopathic achalasia: randomized comparison of water-jet assisted versus conventional dissection technique. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1158-1165
  • 6 Zhou PH, Cai MY, Yao LQ et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia by HybridKnife: a case report. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2012; 2012: 325479
  • 7 Inoue H, Tianle KM, Ikeda H et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: technique, indication, and outcomes. Thorac Surg Clin 2011; 21: 519-525
  • 8 Liu BR, Song JT, Omar Jan M. Video of the month. Modified peroral endoscopic myotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 499
  • 9 Eckardt AJ, Eckardt VF. Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 311-319
  • 10 Swanstrom LL, Rieder E, Dunst CM. A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213: 751-756
  • 11 Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Kalloo AN et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a 4-step approach to a challenging procedure. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 997-998
  • 12 Khashab MA, Sharaiha RZ, Saxena P et al. Novel technique of auto-tunneling during peroral endoscopic myotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 119-122
  • 13 Wang J, Tan N, Xiao Y et al. Safety and efficacy of the modified peroral endoscopic myotomy with shorter myotomy for achalasia patients: a prospective study. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28; 720-727