Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(04): E480-E486
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100718
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Morpho-functional evaluation of small bowel using wireless motility capsule and video capsule endoscopy in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease: pilot study

Diana Yung
1   Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh - Centre of Liver & Digestive Disorders, Edinburgh, UK
,
Sarah Douglas
1   Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh - Centre of Liver & Digestive Disorders, Edinburgh, UK
,
Anthony R. Hobson
2   The Functional Gut Clinic - The Functional Gut Clinic, London, UK
,
Andry Giannakou
3   Open University of Cyprus - Faculty of Economics and Management, Nicosia, Cyprus
,
John N. Plevris
1   Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh - Centre of Liver & Digestive Disorders, Edinburgh, UK
,
Anastasios Koulaouzidis
1   Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh - Centre of Liver & Digestive Disorders, Edinburgh, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 19 September 2015

accepted after revision 04 January 2016

Publication Date:
22 March 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: SmartPill® (Given Imaging Corp.,Yoqneam,Israel) is an ingestible, non-imaging capsule that records physiological data including contractions and pH throughout the gastrointestinal tract. There are scarce data looking at SmartPill® assessment of patients with known/suspected small-bowel Crohn’s Disease (CD). This pilot study aims to investigate feasibility and safety of SmartPill® to assess gut motility in this group. 

Patients and methods: Over 1 year, patients with known/suspected CD, referred for small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), were invited to participate and 12 were recruited (7 female, 5 male, mean age 44.2 ± 16.6 years). They underwent hydrogen breath test to exclude small-bowel bacterial overgrowth, patency capsule (Agile®), and provided stool samples for fecal calprotectin (FC). Patients ingested PillCam®SB2 and SmartPill® 4 hours apart. Using unpublished data, 33 healthy controls also were identified for the study. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Of the 12 patients enrolled, 10 underwent complete Smartpill® examination (1 stomach retention, 1 dropout). Pillcam® was complete in 10 (1 dropout, 1 stomach retention). Mean fecal calprotectin was 340 ± 307.71 mcg/g. The study group had longer transit times and lower gut motility index than did the controls. The difference in motility appears to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). Longer transit times for SmartPill® (not statistically significant) may have been due to different specifications between the capsules. Limitations included transient Smartpill® signal loss (5/10 studies).

Conclusions: This is the first pilot to attempt combining SBCE and SmartPill® to assess small-bowel CD. Data on motility in CD are scarce. Multimodal information can provide a clearer clinical picture. Despite concerns about capsule retention in CD patients, SmartPill® seems safe for use if a patency capsule is employed beforehand.

 
  • References

  • 1 Tran K, Brun R, Kuo B. Evaluation of regional and whole gut motility using the wireless motility capsule: relevance in clinical practice. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2012; 5: 249-560
  • 2 Wang YT, Mohammed SD, Farmer AD et al. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 215 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country and testing protocol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42: 761-772
  • 3 Rao SSC, Camilleri M, Haler WL et al. Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 8-23
  • 4 Bai JP, Burckart GJ, Mulberg AE. Literature Review of Gastrointestinal Physiology in the Elderly, in Pediatric Patients, and in Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases. J Pharm Sci 2015;
  • 5 Wang A, Banerjee S, Barth BA et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 805-15
  • 6 Koulaouzidis A, Plevris JN. Investigating the small-bowel: a brief and concise update. Glob J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 1: 18-28
  • 7 Kopylov U, Papageorgiou NP, Nadler M et al. Head or tail: the orientation of the small bowel capsule endoscope movement in the small bowel. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 694-698
  • 8 Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Heads or tail orientation in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: 2 capsule models with 2 reviewers. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 1102-1104
  • 9 Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4: 7-27
  • 10 Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E et al. Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut 2003; 52: 390-392
  • 11 Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C et al. MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1945-1951
  • 12 Nobrega AC, Ferreira BR, Oliveira GJ et al. Dyspeptic symptoms and delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients with inactive Crohn’s Disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2012; 7: 175
  • 13 Jones MP, Bratten JR. Small intestinal motility. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 164-172
  • 14 Assadsangabi A, Blakeborough A, Drew K et al. Small bowel patency assessment using the patency device and a novel targeted (limited radiation) computed tomography-based protocol. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30: 984-989
  • 15 Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Lewis score correlates more closely with fecal calprotectin than Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 987-993