Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2022; 08(01): e41-e45
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742175
Case Report

Successful Management of a Post-Choledochal Cyst Excision Pancreatic Fistula in an Adult Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review on Risk Factors

Aravinth Anbarasu 
1   Department of General Surgery, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Aparna Deshpande 
1   Department of General Surgery, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Choledochal cyst is a premalignant condition and surgical excision with biliary enteric anastomosis is the standard of care. Surgical treatment in adults may be difficult due to associated biliary pathology and high incidence of postoperative complications is reported. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a rare early complication following choledochal cyst excision.

Material and Methods A 23-year-old male patient was operated for a Todani type IV-A choledochal cyst with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction. Cyst excision with hepaticojejunostomy was performed. Distal stump closure was technically challenging due to extreme thickening of the cyst wall with neovascularization. On postoperative day 2, patient developed tachycardia and progressive tachypnea with 200 mL of pancreatic fluid in the drain. Endoscopic pancreatic stenting was attempted but was technically not possible. At reexploration, leak from oversewn distal cyst stump was identified and the suture line was reinforced. After the second surgery the patient was hemodynamically stable but continued to have a low output pancreatic fistula for few days which was managed conservatively successfully. We conducted a review of English literature with an aim to identify the risk factors and predictors of pancreatic fistula following cyst excision. An electronic search was performed in Medline and Google Scholar during September 2020 and available literature since January 2000 were reviewed. The keywords used were “pancreatic fistula” and “choledochal cyst.”

Results Preoperative cholangiography (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreotography/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) is essential to know the extent of cyst and delineate biliary pancreatic junction. Literature review including our case revealed that Todani type I-c, type IV, and forme fruste type of choledochal cyst are at high risk of pancreatic injury and POPF. Recurrent cholangitis makes excision technically more challenging and complete removal is not always possible.

Conclusion Postoperative pancreatic fistula can be anticipated in select group of patients with high-risk preoperative findings. Chronic inflammation due to recurrent cholangitis promotes scarring and neovascularization which adds to surgical complexity. Operative technique in these high-risk patients needs further refinement.

Keywords

postoperative pancreatic fistula - choledochal cyst


Publication History

Received: 03 November 2020

Accepted: 10 December 2021

Article published online:
01 February 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Jesudason SRB, Jesudason MR, Mukha RP, Vyas FL, Govil S, Muthusami JC. Management of adult choledochal cysts–a 15-year experience. HPB (Oxford) 2006; 8 (04) 299-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Singham J, Yoshida EM, Scudamore CH. Choledochal cysts: part 1 of 3: classification and pathogenesis. Can J Surg 2009; 52 (05) 434-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yamataka A, Ohshiro K, Okada Y. et al. Complications after cyst excision with hepaticoenterostomy for choledochal cysts and their surgical management in children versus adults. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 (07) 1097-1102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Honda S, Okada T, Miyagi H, Minato M, Taketomi A. High drain amylase and lipase values predict post-operative pancreatitis for choledochal cyst. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2014; 11 (02) 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Li M, Jin Q, Feng J. Early postoperative complications of choledochal cyst excision and reconstruction of biliary tract [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2001; 39 (09) 686-689
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gadelhak N, Shehta A, Hamed H. Diagnosis and management of choledochal cyst: 20 years of single center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (22) 7061-7066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Choi JU, Hwang S, Chung Y-K. Management of intractable pancreatic leak from iatrogenic pancreatic duct injury following resection of choledochal cyst in an adult patient. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2020; 24 (02) 228-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liu Y, Sun J, Guo S, Liu Z, Zhu M, Zhang ZL. The distal classification and management of choledochal cyst in adults: based on the relation between cyst and pancreatic duct. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (12) e6350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lilly JR. The surgical treatment of choledochal cyst. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979; 149 (01) 36-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ando H, Kaneko K, Ito T. et al. Complete excision of the intrapancreatic portion of choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183 (04) 317-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ray S, Khamrui S. Inadvertent ligation of the main pancreatic duct: an extremely rare complication of choledochal cyst excision. Indian J Surg 2015; 77 (01) 92-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Diao M, Li L, Cheng W. Is it necessary to ligate distal common bile duct stumps after excising choledochal cysts?. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27 (08) 829-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kolb A, Kleeff J, Frohlich B, Werner J, Friess H, Büchler MW. Resection of the intrapancreatic bile duct preserving the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16 (01) 31-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar