Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · AJP Rep 2022; 12(01): e10-e16
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741540
Case Report

The Effect of Video Education on Skin-to-Skin Contact at the Time of Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Catherine M. Caponero 
1   Ob/Gyn and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kettering Health, Kettering, Ohio
,
Dani G. Zoorob
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Academic Offices, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
,
Victor Heh
4   Office of Academic Affairs, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, Ohio
,
Hind N. Moussa
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kettering Health, Kettering, Ohio
5   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to measure the impact of video education at the time of admission for delivery on intent and participation in skin-to-skin contact (SSC) immediately after birth.

Methods This study was a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention in women (N = 240) of 18 years or older admitted in anticipation of normal spontaneous term delivery. Alternate patients were randomized into video (N = 120) and no video (N = 120) groups. Both groups received a survey about SSC. The video group watched an educational DVD and completed a postsurvey about SSC.

Results During the preintervention survey, 89.2% of those in the video group compared with 83.3% of those in the no video group indicated that they planned to use SSC (p = 0.396). After the video, 98.3% planned to do SSC after delivery (p < 0.001). However, only 59.8% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the video group and only 49.4% started SSC within 5 minutes of delivery in the no video group (p = 0.17).

Conclusion Video education alters the intention and trends toward participation in SSC within 5 minutes of delivery. Despite the plans for SSC, however, there was no significant difference in rates between the two groups. These findings support that obstacles, other than prenatal education, may affect early SSC.

Key Points

  • Significant obstacles impact skin-to-skin rate.

  • Video education alters skin-to-skin intent.

  • Video education can improve skin-to-skin rate.

  • Education can happen at the time of delivery.

  • Video education can impact mothers and infants.

Keywords

skin-to-skin contact - breastfeeding - video education - delivery - prenatal care

Oral Presentations

ACOG Districts V&VII Annual Meeting on Sunday, September 23, 2018, in Kansas City, MO; The ACOOG 86th Annual Conference on Thursday, March 28, 2019, in New Orleans, LA; and The First Annual Network Research Symposium on Friday, May 3, 2019, in Kettering, OH.


Poster Presentations

The ACOOG 86th Annual Conference on Monday, March 25, 2019, in New Orleans, LA; DAGMEC 20th Annual Virginia C. Wood Resident Research Forum on Thursday, April 25, 2019, in Dayton, OH; The First Annual Network Research Symposium on Friday, May 3, 2019, in Kettering, OH; and The 2019 ACOG Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting on Sunday, May 5, 2019, in Nashville, TN.


Poster Publication

2019 MEFACOOG Annual Report.


Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03200925


Authors' Contribution

C.M.C., is the project lead and manuscript initial write-up; D.G.Z. contributed in manuscript editing; V.H. contributed in statistics; and H.N.M. is the mentor and faculty advisor, manuscript write-up.




Publication History

Received: 28 July 2020

Accepted: 08 October 2021

Article published online:
04 February 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Rosen IM, Krueger MV, Carney LM, Graham JA. Prenatal breastfeeding education and breastfeeding outcomes. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2008; 33 (05) 315-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Burgio MA, Laganà AS, Sicilia A. et al. Breastfeeding education: where are we going? A systematic review article. Iran J Public Health 2016; 45 (08) 970-977
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baby-Friendly USA. “Guidelines and Evaluation Criteria for Facilities Seeking Baby-Friendly Designation.”. Albany, NY: Baby-Friendly USA; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Charpak N, Ruiz JG. Latin American Clinical Epidemiology Network Series - Paper 9: the kangaroo mother care method: from scientific evidence generated in Colombia to worldwide practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 86: 125-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vila-candel R, Duke K, Soriano-vidal FJ, Castro-sánchez E. Affect of early skin-to-skin mother-infant contact in the maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding: experience in a health department in Spain. J Hum Lact 2018; 34 (02) 304-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chung M, Raman G, Trikalinos T, Lau J, Ip S. Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: an evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149 (08) 565-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (03) CD003519
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Guise JM, Palda V, Westhoff C, Chan BK, Helfand M, Lieu TA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1 (02) 70-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martínez-Galiano JM, Delgado-Rodríguez M. Influence of an education program of pregnant women on delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27 (07) 719-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shealy KR, Li R, Benton-Davis S, Grummer-Strawn LM. The CDC Guide to Breastfeeding Interventions. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 11 O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979; 35 (03) 549-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Krouse HJ. Video modelling to educate patients. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33 (06) 748-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hurtubise L, Martin B, Gilliland A, Mahan J. To play or not to play: leveraging video in medical education. J Grad Med Educ 2013; 5 (01) 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Abu Abed M, Himmel W, Vormfelde S, Koschack J. Video-assisted patient education to modify behavior: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 97 (01) 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar