Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(01): 113-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740939
Back to the Basics

Embolic Agents: Coils

Nicholas Xiao
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Robert J. Lewandowski
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations

Catheter-directed embolization is one of the cornerstones and defining procedures of interventional radiology. Armed with a plethora of agents and devices, interventionalists can acutely stop flow, usually of a blood vessel, to effectively treat pathologies from head to toe. The list of pathologies treatable by embolization is extensive and diverse, including life-threatening hemorrhage, aneurysms, lymphatic duct leaks, varices, pelvic congestion syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia, uterine fibroids, and cancer.

Coils are arguably one of the most important embolization agents due to their ease of use, visibility on fluoroscopy, and ready availability. Coils are made from steel or platinum and offer permanent occlusion when deployed. They come in a wide range of shapes, sizes, coating materials, and deployment methods which can be used for effective target embolization in a variety of scenarios. The aim of this article is to provide a general back-to-the-basics overview of coil embolization. We discuss the historical development of coils as an embolization material, the numerous various coil types and their respective advantages/disadvantages, as well as general clinical and technical considerations when utilizing coils for embolization.

Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest

None declared.




Publication History

Article published online:
18 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Mullan S. Experiences with surgical thrombosis of intracranial berry aneurysms and carotid cavernous fistulas. J Neurosurg 1974; 41 (06) 657-670
  • 2 Gianturco C, Anderson JH, Wallace S. Mechanical devices for arterial occlusion. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975; 124 (03) 428-435
  • 3 Henkes H, Brew S, Miloslavski E, Fischer S, Tavrovski I, Kühne D. The underlying mechanisms of endovascular exclusion of intracranial aneurysms by coils. How important is electrothrombosis?. Interv Neuroradiol 2003; 9 (02) 127-140
  • 4 Yuki I, Lee D, Murayama Y. et al. Thrombus organization and healing in an experimental aneurysm model. Part II. The effect of various types of bioactive bioabsorbable polymeric coils. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (01) 109-120
  • 5 Kauvar DS, Schechtman DW, Thomas SB. et al. Endovascular embolization techniques in a novel swine model of fatal uncontrolled solid organ hemorrhage and coagulopathy. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 70: 143-151
  • 6 Prasad V, Chan RP, Faughnan ME. Embolotherapy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: efficacy of platinum versus stainless steel coils. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (2, Pt 1): 153-160
  • 7 Ferral H. Hydrogel-coated coils: product description and clinical applications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015; 32 (04) 343-348
  • 8 White JB, Ken CG, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (07) 1242-1246
  • 9 Lee CY, Yim MB, Benndorf G. Mechanical detachment of Guglielmi detachable coils after failed electrolytic detachment: rescue from a technical complication. Neurosurgery 2008;63(4, Suppl 2):293–294, discussion 294
  • 10 Pickett GE, Cora A. Electrothermal coil detachment failure in flow diverter-assisted coiling of a small blister aneurysm: technical considerations and possible solutions. Neurointervention 2021; 16 (02) 171-174
  • 11 Lopera JE. Embolization in trauma: principles and techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol 2010; 27 (01) 14-28
  • 12 Nelson PK, Levy DI. Balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: medium-term angiographic and clinical follow-up in 22 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22 (01) 19-26
  • 13 Yasumoto T, Osuga K, Yamamoto H. et al. Long-term outcomes of coil packing for visceral aneurysms: correlation between packing density and incidence of coil compaction or recanalization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (12) 1798-1807
  • 14 Falagas ME, Nikou SA, Siempos II. Infections related to coils used for embolization of arteries: review of the published evidence. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18 (06) 697-701
  • 15 Uwatoko T, Tsumoto T, Wada N. et al. Dermatitis caused by metal allergy after coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (10) e42
  • 16 Shindel AW, Zhu H, Hovsepian DM, Brandes SB. Ureteric embolization with stainless-steel coils for managing refractory lower urinary tract fistula: a 12-year experience. BJU Int 2007; 99 (02) 364-368
  • 17 Chen E, Itkin M. Thoracic duct embolization for chylous leaks. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011; 28 (01) 63-74
  • 18 Gandhoke GS, Pandya YK, Jadhav AP. et al. Cost of coils for intracranial aneurysms: clinical decision analysis for implementation of a capitation model. J Neurosurg 2018; 128 (06) 1792-1798
  • 19 Simon SD, Reig AS, James RF, Reddy P, Mericle RA. Relative cost comparison of embolic materials used for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2010; 2 (02) 163-167