Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740924
Opinions, Attitudes, and Prescribing Practices of Oral Contraceptive Pills of General Practitioners and Gynecologists in India
Funding The above work was supported by an ad hoc research scheme funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research—ICMR, New Delhi (Ref No.: 5 / 10 / 12 / 2009-RHN). The work of S.K. was funded as a research project by the ICMR.
Abstract
Background To study the prescription behavior of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) by physicians, gynecologists, and alternative medicine practitioners (AMPs).
Materials and Methods Close-ended questionnaire-based cross-section study was performed between 1st September 2012 and 28th February 2014 in three groups of responders, i.e., AMP, general medical practitioners (GMPs), and obstetricians and gynecologists (ObGy). A stratified random cluster sample was used. Data of 400 subjects in all three groups were obtained using both univariate and multi-variate sophisticated statistical analyses for analyzing attitude and practices and were recorded on an ordinal scale using appropriate non-parametric test.
Results Of the 1,237 subjects surveyed, 400 completed questionnaires were received from each of the three groups viz; AMPs, GMPs, and ObGy. Remaining 37 incomplete questionnaires were not included in the final analysis.
Conclusion There are equal misconceptions regarding OCPs among users and prescribing physicians. Preference for OCPs in married and unmarried women is also equally low. OCP usage and their prescription practices can be improved by removing potential barriers, developing public–private partnership, and training promoters.
Keywords
oral contraceptive pills - birth rates prescribing behavior - general practitioners - gynecologistsCompliance with Ethical Standards
The study was conducted as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research project, and complete adherence to prescribed ethical standards was followed including institutional ethical clearance and informed consent of all participants.
Author Contributions
S.K. conceived the study, wrote the research proposal, and was the principal investigator. V.D. with the help of all other authors designed and tested the questionnaire, conducted the survey, and computed the data. Y.P. provided the technical and clinical inputs. G.G. and A.P. did the statistical analyses. A.P. facilitated and provided inputs in content validity and logistics of data collection.
Publication History
Article published online:
30 December 2021
© 2021. National Academy of Medical Sciences (India). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Singh P, Singh KK, Singh P. Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): a multilevel study. PLoS One 2021; 16 (03) e0246530
- 2 Family Health International. India Brief 1- the status of family planning in India: an introduction. Accessed June 10, 2021 at: https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/india1-family-planning-status.pdf
- 3 WHO. | Family planning - a global handbook for providers. WHO. Accessed August 23, 2021 at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fp-global-handbook/en/
- 4 International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. NFHS-3 Fact Sheet. 2009 . Accessed June 10, 2021 at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/India.pdf
- 5 Calhoun LM, Speizer IS, Rimal R. et al. Provider imposed restrictions to clients' access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 (01) 532
- 6 Sulak PJ, Buckley T, Kuehl TJ. Attitudes and prescribing preferences of health care professionals in the United States regarding use of extended-cycle oral contraceptives. Contraception 2006; 73 (01) 41-45
- 7 Seval DL, Buckley T, Kuehl TJ, Sulak PJ. Attitudes and prescribing patterns of extended-cycle oral contraceptives. Contraception 2011; 84 (01) 71-75
- 8 Wiegratz I, Galiläer K, Sänger N, Rody A, Kuhl H, Schleussner E. Prescribing preferences and personal experience of female gynaecologists in Germany and Austria regarding use of extended-cycle oral contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2010; 15 (06) 405-412
- 9 Yang X, Li X, Wang Y, He X, Zhao Y. Practices and knowledge of female gynecologists regarding contraceptive use: a real-world Chinese survey. Reprod Health 2018; 15 (01) 115
- 10 Hamani Y, Sciaki-Tamir Y, Deri-Hasid R, Miller-Pogrund T, Milwidsky A, Haimov-Kochman R. Misconceptions about oral contraception pills among adolescents and physicians. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (12) 3078-3083
- 11 Choi A, Dempsey A. Strategies to improve compliance among oral contraceptive pill users: a review of the literature. Open Access J Contracept 2014; 5: 17-22
- 12 Judge-Golden CP, Smith KJ, Mor MK, Borrero S. Financial implications of 12-month dispensing of oral contraceptive pills in the veterans affairs health care system. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (09) 1201-1208
- 13 Ghule M, Raj A, Palaye P. et al. Barriers to use contraceptive methods among rural young married couples in Maharashtra, India: qualitative findings. Asian J Res Soc Sci Humanit 2015; 5 (06) 18-33